Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat [View all]sheshe2
(95,370 posts)78. "Your whole first paragraph, hectoring me about the 2016 general election, ignores the distinction t
Jim Lane
73. Apparently, though, not interesting enough for you to read it with any care.
Your whole first paragraph, hectoring me about the 2016 general election, ignores the distinction that I drew. Bernie ran in the 2016 primaries; after the convention, he endorsed Clinton, and the overwhelming majority of his supporters (including your humble servant) voted for her. As should have been obvious, I was talking about a hypothetical election in which Bernie might not be allowed to run.
73. Apparently, though, not interesting enough for you to read it with any care.
Your whole first paragraph, hectoring me about the 2016 general election, ignores the distinction that I drew. Bernie ran in the 2016 primaries; after the convention, he endorsed Clinton, and the overwhelming majority of his supporters (including your humble servant) voted for her. As should have been obvious, I was talking about a hypothetical election in which Bernie might not be allowed to run.
Hmmm...My first paragraph. After your first comment here:
People who feel that their candidate lost the nomination fairly and squarely can usually reconcile themselves to voting for the winner. People who feel that they've been cheated are much less likely to do so.
Then my first paragraph that you refer to.
Hmmm. Interesting statement. Which one are you? A person that feel their candidate lost fairly and squarely and have reconciled themselves for voting for the winner? Or are you feeling cheated? How were you cheated? How exactly were you and Bernie cheated. Who stole the election from you? And why the hell are you still refighting a primary that is long over?
Then off you go! I think that it is you that is not reading it right. I never said any of what you just posted, Your response is OTT. I think you should back away and calm down. I never hectored you about the 2016 general election. You made that up.
As for the rest of your post, If BS wants a 2020 run if the rules apply then he runs and stays a Dem. Your comments boarder abusive. I am done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
216 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat [View all]
musette_sf
Jun 2018
OP
Sarandon was Green in 2000, and so was Michael Moore, and they both supported Nader, and
still_one
Jun 2018
#178
They didn't just boo Hillary Clinton, they booed the great American John Lewis. Very sad.
George II
Jun 2018
#53
Yes, but it was Sanders to Trump voters who gave Trump his margin of victory
lapucelle
Jun 2018
#116
Well then that would indicate to me that Obama was a far stronger candidate than Clinton
shanny
Jun 2018
#139
And yet, a lower percentage Bernie voters supported the other party on election day.
shanny
Jun 2018
#192
That is because Obama was able to excite more people to come out to vote.
LostOne4Ever
Jun 2018
#145
So if Jill Stein decides to hop on board for the money and the marketing resources
ehrnst
Jun 2018
#184
Yes. No open primaries. Now we're getting somewhere. No more divisive interlopers.
brush
Jun 2018
#100
Thank you Dems. Another reason to support the Party that looks out for the security of all
Wwcd
Jun 2018
#13
Are you saying in 2016 you were rejected and ignored and stuff? Is that what you mean?
Squinch
Jun 2018
#102
A bit of wild projection at the end there. You might want to watch that. I think it reveals
Squinch
Jun 2018
#123
"more than I want to reveal"? that's a laugh--it was friendly advice; take it, or don't
shanny
Jun 2018
#136
They're not kicking out non-Dems. This is ONLY about Presidential candidates. Very narrow.
Honeycombe8
Jun 2018
#169
"Your whole first paragraph, hectoring me about the 2016 general election, ignores the distinction t
sheshe2
Jun 2018
#78
It's ALWAYS threats, She. Usually threatening actions that hurt them as much as everyone else, but
Squinch
Jun 2018
#104
No, the point is that Stein wouldn't have to lie more. This time she could just tell the truth.
Jim Lane
Jun 2018
#37
It's not a question of "progressives", it's a question of DEMOCRATS! If you are a....
George II
Jun 2018
#41
How is it a loss for Dems? If they were Dems they'll already be registered as Dems.
brush
Jun 2018
#101
Yes, that's its scope, and I'm talking primarily about the race for President.
Jim Lane
Jun 2018
#127
I understood superdelegates were set up to block undesirable candidates from winning. nt
Lucky Luciano
Jun 2018
#48
can they also add that tax returns are to be provided if they are to get funding from the DNC..
samnsara
Jun 2018
#29
That will probably be dealt with either via state Democratic Parties or legislatures....
George II
Jun 2018
#31
Question is, will this stop repukes running as Democrats from running and switching parties?
meow2u3
Jun 2018
#36
Will Bernie join or run on the Ralph Nader "Give the Election to Trump 2020" Independent ticket?
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2018
#39
If Bernie wanted to run as an I for president he would have done so in '16 after the primary
LostOne4Ever
Jun 2018
#149
I'll withhold my more *$!&emphatic%#* comments, and leave it at, "This sounds like a fine idea."
NBachers
Jun 2018
#56
I am glad to see Democrats doing this but unfortunate there was the need to state an obvious.
ChrisTee
Jun 2018
#80
Didn't Sanders change his affiliation for the purpose of running in the primary?
Calista241
Jun 2018
#94
Amen to that! My only complaint is that it took too long to do it. NT
Bleacher Creature
Jun 2018
#118
A DNC committee has adopted a rule that presidential candidates must be party members.
Gothmog
Jun 2018
#129
This rule has been on the books since 2016 and was not aimed directly at Sanders
pecosbob
Jun 2018
#177
Or a rule that says they have to remain a Democrat even if they lose after using the party.
MrsCoffee
Jun 2018
#194
It Is About Time! Stop Ignoring Long Time Democrats in Favor of Social Media...
TomCADem
Jun 2018
#195
now they just need a rule that says Democrats actually have to support DEMOCRATIC policies not
yurbud
Jun 2018
#205
but you faint when someone who supports Democratic policies more faithfully than our "leaders" wants
yurbud
Jun 2018
#210
how do you define a "genuine" Democrat? What's the "litmus test" centrists that are ok?
yurbud
Jun 2018
#214