Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
10. You are absolutely right.
Wed Nov 29, 2017, 02:22 PM
Nov 2017

It presents as a tech company that is allowing society to do all these amazing things, but in reality, as you say, it is an unregulated taxi service - a network of underpaid drivers using their own vehicles in an inherently risky job, with no recourse for problems, no security in terms of employment stability or otherwise, no benefits, and all the risks.

I know quite a few people who rely on Uber and Lyft to get around affordably - in my region public transportation is not useful to most people. I also know several people who drive for Uber or Lyft because there is so little reliable work around here, particularly no flexible work for people with other issues/problems/responsibilities. And I hear these services being defended due to the fact that this number of people apparently benefit from their existence. But in the big picture, I think they are a sign of a sick society where the paupers are barely propping each other up while the techie investors and wunderkinds make billions. It is really fucked up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Uber facing federal probe...»Reply #10