Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bacon, sausages and ham rank alongside smoking as cancer causes, says WHO [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,445 posts)111. The risk: a 0.8% higher chance of coloreectal cancer from 2oz processed meat per day
(with US figures; about 1% higher, with UK figures)
The IARC estimated that eating 50 grams of processed meat daily one hot dog, say, or two bacon slices can increase your relative risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent. That's way less scary than it sounds. In the United States, a person's lifetime risk of colorectal cancer is about 4.5 percent. So eating a hot dog every single day would bump that lifetime risk up to 5.3 percent. Eating more processed meat would nudge those numbers up further. But the overall risk is still fairly low.
http://www.vox.com/2015/10/26/9617928/iarc-cancer-risk-carcinogenic
http://www.vox.com/2015/10/26/9617928/iarc-cancer-risk-carcinogenic
Theres now a large body of evidence that bowel cancer is more common among people who eat the most red and processed meat. As this evidence has steadily built up, weve blogged about it several times and its covered on the NHS Choices website and by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF).
...
The most convincing overview of the evidence of a link to bowel cancer comes from a 2011 analysis by researchers at the WCRF, who combined the results of a number of previous studies, to try to get a clear sense of the overall picture.
They were able to group the data according to those who ate the most red and processed meat and those who ate the least. A key finding from the WCRF analysis is that red meat and processed meat arent equally harmful: processed meat is more strongly linked to bowel cancer than red meat.
...
We know that, out of every 1000 people in the UK, about 61 will develop bowel cancer at some point in their lives. Those who eat the lowest amount of processed meat are likely to have a lower lifetime risk than the rest of the population (about 56 cases per 1000 low meat-eaters).
If this is correct, the WCRFs analysis suggests that, among 1000 people who eat the most processed meat, youd expect 66 to develop bowel cancer at some point in their lives 10 more than the group who eat the least processed meat.
http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2015/10/26/processed-meat-and-cancer-what-you-need-to-know/
...
The most convincing overview of the evidence of a link to bowel cancer comes from a 2011 analysis by researchers at the WCRF, who combined the results of a number of previous studies, to try to get a clear sense of the overall picture.
They were able to group the data according to those who ate the most red and processed meat and those who ate the least. A key finding from the WCRF analysis is that red meat and processed meat arent equally harmful: processed meat is more strongly linked to bowel cancer than red meat.
...
We know that, out of every 1000 people in the UK, about 61 will develop bowel cancer at some point in their lives. Those who eat the lowest amount of processed meat are likely to have a lower lifetime risk than the rest of the population (about 56 cases per 1000 low meat-eaters).
If this is correct, the WCRFs analysis suggests that, among 1000 people who eat the most processed meat, youd expect 66 to develop bowel cancer at some point in their lives 10 more than the group who eat the least processed meat.
http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2015/10/26/processed-meat-and-cancer-what-you-need-to-know/
The classification means that they are very confident this link is real - like they're confident the link between alcohol and some cancers is real. They're also sure the link between tobacco and cancer is real, but that's a far greater risk. See the Vox article for more.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bacon, sausages and ham rank alongside smoking as cancer causes, says WHO [View all]
brooklynite
Oct 2015
OP
Your grandparents didn't eat pink slime formed together and called red meat. n/t
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#15
I see how the internet sucks for reading between the lines, and you can put a :) in the title
Reter
Oct 2015
#107
I doubt that even 100 years ago that people ate red meat at about every meal.
LiberalArkie
Oct 2015
#42
Exactly. There are a lot of myths used to rationalize gorging on industrially-produced meat now
villager
Oct 2015
#76
This has been know for some time. Still it is good that it calling attention to it
still_one
Oct 2015
#2
"another study will tell you NOT eating ... shortens life" - yes, like eggs.
closeupready
Oct 2015
#30
Eh...fuck it. Still eating ham, bacon, red meat, etc. It's not like I have it every day.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2015
#39
Uhm, just a quibble, but in the case of salt, there is no chemical difference between "sea salt"..
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#72
I would say follow the directions from your doctor, removing salt entirely from you diet is harmful.
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#79
More than one highly respected person I've listened to has mentioned the differences between the two
Gregorian
Oct 2015
#121
Up until a couple of months ago, I thought there might be chemical differences between sea salt...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#122
gotten worse when they took the dog food scrap and started feeding it to humans. Worse
Sunlei
Oct 2015
#58
Hopefully lab grown, cloned meat becomes economical, that's my hope...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#73
I may die a little earlier because of bacon, but you have to be a little skeptical.
Vinca
Oct 2015
#81
we know that meat production is bad for human health, deadly for the animals it kills,
restorefreedom
Oct 2015
#87
The risk: a 0.8% higher chance of coloreectal cancer from 2oz processed meat per day
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2015
#111
Well there's mass produced chemically smoked bacon and then there's the other kinc
Monk06
Oct 2015
#123