Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bacon, sausages and ham rank alongside smoking as cancer causes, says WHO [View all]Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)11. I know
I was pointing out though that early hominids didn't smoke (since the OP mentioned smoking). And you are correct, our methods of curing meats is very different today than it was even 100 years ago. I think the addition of so many chemicals in the modern curing process is the problem.
Of course, the Bacon Industrial Complex will not take this fact quietly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bacon, sausages and ham rank alongside smoking as cancer causes, says WHO [View all]
brooklynite
Oct 2015
OP
Your grandparents didn't eat pink slime formed together and called red meat. n/t
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#15
I see how the internet sucks for reading between the lines, and you can put a :) in the title
Reter
Oct 2015
#107
I doubt that even 100 years ago that people ate red meat at about every meal.
LiberalArkie
Oct 2015
#42
Exactly. There are a lot of myths used to rationalize gorging on industrially-produced meat now
villager
Oct 2015
#76
This has been know for some time. Still it is good that it calling attention to it
still_one
Oct 2015
#2
"another study will tell you NOT eating ... shortens life" - yes, like eggs.
closeupready
Oct 2015
#30
Eh...fuck it. Still eating ham, bacon, red meat, etc. It's not like I have it every day.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2015
#39
Uhm, just a quibble, but in the case of salt, there is no chemical difference between "sea salt"..
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#72
I would say follow the directions from your doctor, removing salt entirely from you diet is harmful.
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#79
More than one highly respected person I've listened to has mentioned the differences between the two
Gregorian
Oct 2015
#121
Up until a couple of months ago, I thought there might be chemical differences between sea salt...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#122
gotten worse when they took the dog food scrap and started feeding it to humans. Worse
Sunlei
Oct 2015
#58
Hopefully lab grown, cloned meat becomes economical, that's my hope...
Humanist_Activist
Oct 2015
#73
I may die a little earlier because of bacon, but you have to be a little skeptical.
Vinca
Oct 2015
#81
we know that meat production is bad for human health, deadly for the animals it kills,
restorefreedom
Oct 2015
#87
The risk: a 0.8% higher chance of coloreectal cancer from 2oz processed meat per day
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2015
#111
Well there's mass produced chemically smoked bacon and then there's the other kinc
Monk06
Oct 2015
#123