Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Time to leave a few execs dangling from lamp posts as object lessons. hobbit709 Mar 2015 #1
If only this had been obvious and easily predictable from the outset. Orrex Mar 2015 #2
........ daleanime Mar 2015 #3
Can anyone explain to me Kelvin Mace Mar 2015 #4
Do you suffer from "Outrage Fatigue?" gregcrawford Mar 2015 #5
Personally, I'm not a rampage kind of guy Kelvin Mace Mar 2015 #6
Agree. riversedge Mar 2015 #7
no polite conversation from me (though I am polite)... salin Mar 2015 #17
BP has done it many times, so has DuPont and many others! Dustlawyer Mar 2015 #20
seriosly what do those people do any way. seriously. allan01 Mar 2015 #8
how about CT's execs -we just got a 26% rate hike wordpix Mar 2015 #9
All of the pg&e execs who participated in the pilfering of pipeline safety money should be on trial Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #10
I'm with you but in my state (CT) wordpix Mar 2015 #11
The Feds and States have basically hollowed out their corporate lawbreaking divisions. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #12
Isn't PG&E pretty hated? AngryDem001 Mar 2015 #13
IMO if they diverted that money they should charged with murder or atleast manslaughter. nt cstanleytech Mar 2015 #14
this is fraud Skittles Mar 2015 #15
count me in favor of prosecutions and claw backs ArcticFox Mar 2015 #16
Big business as a whole is following the same model. Larry Engels Mar 2015 #18
Take time to look up Mooney and Billings on the net... bayareaboy Mar 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Funds for safety went to ...»Reply #15