Announcements

PufPuf23

(9,233 posts)

438. The problem here is I lost jury duty and was no where near guilty of what was described.

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:12 PM

Jun 2016

I served on 100s of juries and served fairly and in spirt of TOS; I actually read the vast majority of threads before deciding and I was 100% non-partisan in my votes.

I have only ever made 3 (now 4) alerts and a post was hidden (back in mid April) ) and became the reason for a long, vile, and paranoid OP and thread on alert stalking, gang hides, etc in the Hillary Clinton group.

On April 27 I told Nurse Jackie I had made the alert and the things in the thread were not true. It was only my 3rd alert (now 4) in years at DU.

I was friendly and kind to NJ and was in the spirit to stop the paranoia and accusations. NJ asked for links to the alert and follow up thread about the alert and I have never been called to a jury since.

The problem is I don't alert abuse and made great effort to be fair in jury service and in no way was I guilty in the least to the quote from Skinner. I have actually read the entire thread for the vast majority of juried posts.

So some of us are more equal than others. What else is new?

I don't think it a badge of honor but rather a spot of creepiness.

I have always strived to play by the rules and be a good and non-obtrusive member of DU.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

713 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About the upcoming transition to general election season [View all] Skinner Jun 2016 OP

Thanks for the post. TransitJohn Jun 2016 #1

I told people there would not be mass bannings RobertEarl Jun 2016 #44

The question is not going to come up. The question is: Can everyone unite and get out voters, so L. Coyote Jun 2016 #117

The political revolution is to change the status quo in the Dem Party, not to accept it. n/t JimDandy Jun 2016 #198

This is Democratic Underground louis c Jun 2016 #328

Exactly, this is Democratic Underground JimDandy Jun 2016 #350

Ultimately, this is whatever place Skinner decides it is. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #369

As long as you don't bash the Dem Party in order to harm it. Suggestions should be welcome. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #443

"underground" with respect to what, though? yodermon Jun 2016 #360

Democrats who are for the party and for the nominees to be elected. I don't think Dino is a term kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #445

louis c—I've seen what election ballots look like. CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #611

Tiny demurrer. IMO, the revolution is to change the status quo in the US merrily Jun 2016 #557

Skinner knows that Hillary is going to be our nominee, there was no headline about Bernie in the GE. dubyadiprecession Jun 2016 #429

Like that picture and your attitude. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #439

Pass it around. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #483

You can discuss it if you're not trashing her in the process. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #244

I think the post above makes it crystal clear. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #368

Still get elected? marions ghost Jun 2016 #516

I would prefer to cross that bridge when we come to it. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #517

You made the projection... marions ghost Jun 2016 #522

It's irrelevant how I see it at this point. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #527

You brought up the hypothetical of an indictment marions ghost Jun 2016 #530

He has addressed it. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #536

Where has Skinner said marions ghost Jun 2016 #539

Until such a thing actually happens, barrow-wight Jun 2016 #548

No One Indicted Can Win Let Alone Keep Running billhicks76 Jun 2016 #534

Well then I guess we shall see what happens. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #537

I'm Assuming She Won't Be Indicted billhicks76 Jun 2016 #545

The only fairytale barrow-wight Jun 2016 #549

Weapon? billhicks76 Jun 2016 #667

Why do fictional "indictments" always come up in discussions like this? George II Jun 2016 #609

It's last hope house. The very last chance. Laser102 Jun 2016 #624

K & R BootinUp Jun 2016 #2

It will be nice to focus on Trump, for sure n/t Godhumor Jun 2016 #3

Hear hear. christx30 Jun 2016 #73

Thank you, christx! NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #256

... BooScout Jun 2016 #288

Amen! Loki Jun 2016 #381

Mahalo, christx! Cha Jun 2016 #491

+1 Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #495

Thank-you christx still_one Jun 2016 #498

Best make that June 16th instead, TexasTowelie Jun 2016 #523

Yes, indeed. I agree completely. maddiemom Jun 2016 #666

If he is the nominee., I still think that won't happen, too demented and all. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #485

Will those of us who have been purged from the jury rolls Blue_In_AK Jun 2016 #4

Yes. Skinner Jun 2016 #15

I could never figure out why I was purged after the middle of March. Blue_In_AK Jun 2016 #38

Your profile says 100% chance of serving on juries mnhtnbb Jun 2016 #220

I get a jury notice every other day LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2016 #296

I sometimes get multiple jury requests in the same day! femmedem Jun 2016 #357

I get two a day every day because I sign on in the middle of the day when people are at work hollysmom Jun 2016 #366

I've wondered about this, also. enlightenment Jun 2016 #292

I went from one every day, sometimes even 2 arikara Jun 2016 #411

WoW! This happens? we want people to feel confident that they aren't being judged by trolls who" Her Sister Jun 2016 #41

Everything Seems Fair To Me billhicks76 Jun 2016 #214

Any say on what's going on with people who have racked up dozens of hides? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #456

Since the amnesty they've really felt free to rack up the hides Capt. Obvious Jun 2016 #590

Here's the problem. Will "both major party nominees" really become clear on June 16? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #5

It's clear now. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #13

No IT IS NOT CLEAR>>> As The Convention Is When And Where ALL Will Become CLEAR, NOT Before! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #294

It's very clear now wyldwolf Jun 2016 #316

Some People Can Foresee Problems When Others Cannot... Here Is One "Collection" Of Problems... CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #324

Mika is not part of the nominating process wyldwolf Jun 2016 #336

LOL! Plucketeer Jun 2016 #392

LOL! wyldwolf Jun 2016 #551

Enjoy your fantasy eom Plucketeer Jun 2016 #588

It appears it's the Bernie followers living in a fantasy world. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #614

OK....... Plucketeer Jun 2016 #618

This isn't your website. Skinner gets to decide. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #541

Quit Trying To Frame Reality For Us billhicks76 Jun 2016 #535

Someone needs a frame reality for you wyldwolf Jun 2016 #552

As Long As It's Not You billhicks76 Jun 2016 #671

Perhaps wyldwolf Jun 2016 #678

I'll Be Voting Democrat in Nov No Matter What billhicks76 Jun 2016 #697

Good. Because it doesn't really matter how little you know about the process... wyldwolf Jun 2016 #699

I Easily Know As Much As You billhicks76 Jun 2016 #702

Be careful with that chip on your shoulder Cary Jun 2016 #586

Typical Threats billhicks76 Jun 2016 #669

Threats? Cary Jun 2016 #696

Over People Saying Better Be Careful billhicks76 Jun 2016 #701

Wow. Cary Jun 2016 #704

And when you own the website, you can determine that. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #374

It says the 17th, NOT the convention. If you aren't happy, you may want to go to a Sanders site. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #450

It's CLEAR as far as DU is concerned. Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #712

+1!!!! n/t baran Jun 2016 #14

Jury: My 3yo alerted in this while playing with my iPad. Quackers Jun 2016 #82

lol Renew Deal Jun 2016 #107

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #146

Would your 3 year old.... HeartoftheMidwest Jun 2016 #346

Yes. Skinner Jun 2016 #17

Only to Hillary supporters. But the ACTUAL nominee can not be known until the convention. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #62

It seem to me Eko Jun 2016 #96

Your post reminds me of anti-vaxxer argument Renew Deal Jun 2016 #111

Your post reminds me of your hosting skills. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #147

Skinner pretty much gave you guys everything you want vdogg Jun 2016 #118

The post is wrong. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #159

Juror 7 has an opinion. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #145

Thank you juror #7. There seems to be a lot of censorship on this "democratic" site. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #200

This is a privately owned site that promotes Democrats barrow-wight Jun 2016 #377

How is this privately owned and run forum "democratic"? Perhaps a review of the About DU page is in uppityperson Jun 2016 #390

It's OK, if you want to make this a fantasy site, no problem. I don't own it. But I do own my pdsimdars Jun 2016 #603

I'm not sure you put that in the right place uppityperson Jun 2016 #632

I have NEVER said you can't set up the rules. You have made that up out of thin air. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #654

Again, wtf? I can't set up rules because I'm not Admin. Again with the snarky insults without uppityperson Jun 2016 #655

You're not interjecting thought, you're clinging to irrational bias Corporate666 Jun 2016 #688

All 7 jurors rightly said LEAVE IT ALONE.. Therefore you weren't "censored." emulatorloo Jun 2016 #627

Amen to that!! Glad to see a 0-7 smackdown. 7962 Jun 2016 #254

Just about every complain jane Jun 2016 #286

You can add me to your count. Stonepounder Jun 2016 #315

Look, I just posted what the standard is. If you want to rationalize or make excuses, that is pdsimdars Jun 2016 #594

The fat lady doesn't sing until the convention next month Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #629

Authoritarian? barrow-wight Jun 2016 #375

Anyone who thinks they can start an equivalent site, best of luck! L. Coyote Jun 2016 #487

I don't imagine it did. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #518

Ahem.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #430

Heh heh.... kjones Jun 2016 #596

That's the thing. The writer of that article lied about how the process works. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #500

You obviously didn't read with comprehension. The authore never asserted that. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #593

The vote of delegates ALWAYS determines the nominee. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #674

And they do not vote UNTIL THE CONVENTION. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #681

Hence the the term PRESUMPTIVE nominee. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #683

Your analysis is wrong-based on history Clinton will be the presumptive nominee on June 7 Gothmog Jun 2016 #583

Reality is good enough for me! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #610

If they come around DU criticizing the Democratic candidate, I'll invite them to Free Republican... Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2016 #76

I assume you mean Free Republic, truebluegreen Jun 2016 #352

I actually meant another place; but this isn't a religion discussion... Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2016 #405

No, it hasn't. "Apparent" or "Presumed"... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #105

Skinner thinks that's a good reason. And he gets to decide. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #322

+100! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #351

What part of that don't they understand?? This is Skinner's site, for chrissakes. And he's being BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #423

Yawn billhicks76 Jun 2016 #538

And hence the problem. seekthetruth Jun 2016 #137

"it's been a nasty experience being a member of DU AND being a supporter of Sanders." tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #308

+1000 barrow-wight Jun 2016 #378

+ 2000 eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #424

I know, right? They have the majority of the board, ruled the jury pool.. "85%" .. we got Cha Jun 2016 #511

I thank the heavens for the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Groups. I'd otherwise not come to BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #569

I wouldn't be @ DU if it weren't for The BOG, Hill's Gr, or the AA GR, either.. Cha Jun 2016 #571

The pretend or real misunderstanding of both "Democratic" and "Underground" betsuni Jun 2016 #576

Oh, it sinks in all right. Make no mistake and think otherwise. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #591

++++++1000~ sheshe2 Jun 2016 #663

It's only the past 2wks to a month that Clinton supporters were not being beat up on, alerted kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #453

Been banned, ignored and had a few hidden posts. seekthetruth Jun 2016 #464

That's the way it's been with my few "hides"... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #682

Well said, tarheelsunc.. We're tough enough! Cha Jun 2016 #501

+30000 treestar Jun 2016 #564

Ain't that the truth George II Jun 2016 #608

Thank-you. still_one Jun 2016 #613

+1...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #625

+3,000. nt MADem Jun 2016 #626

+10^10^100 It's hard to imagine how some folks can be so unaware of what's happening around them stevenleser Jun 2016 #645

Yeah shenmue Jun 2016 #657

this is how i see it too, seekthetruth. nt hopemountain Jun 2016 #449

In the end, there's always one candidate who wins and the rest who don't. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #496

Superdelegates vote at the convention. Not over till then. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #502

All delegates vote at the convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #507

Exactly, as you say, it ain't over till it's over, and this looks like a mighty long game from where highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #509

There's 13 days left until all primaries are concluded. At that point there's no more "game" left. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #514

As if DU was the only game in town, first of all. Secondly, the feelings and expression of at least highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #521

It's so unfair that the majority didn't vote for Sanders Cary Jun 2016 #575

What majority? seekthetruth Jun 2016 #641

I don't have "a candidate." Cary Jun 2016 #648

It's not a question of whether I like the Party or not.... seekthetruth Jun 2016 #687

Things change. Cary Jun 2016 #695

Doesn't matter. Cranking down the ambient bile is all for the good... JHB Jun 2016 #178

Thats exactly right. If neither candidate has the requisite number of pledged delegates to bjo59 Jun 2016 #224

That's not how it works and that's never been how it works. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #494

It's clear to the person who owns the website. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #372

Yes, it will be. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #490

It is very clear now who will be the nominee of the Democratic party Gothmog Jun 2016 #582

Thanks! I'm looking forward to the new jury system ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6

Do you still think that I abused the jury system? PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #427

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #434

For your recollection. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #441

You make many assumptions... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #559

I told you I made an alert and your post was hidden. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #601

If what you say is true, then you've likely been eliminated from jury service because ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #612

I served on juries impartially and fairly. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #644

Obviously this is of great importance to you, but I feel compelled to let you know ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #650

Actually I do not miss jury duty. I have no case to make to Skinner. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #659

Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT. fleur-de-lisa Jun 2016 #617

Thank you. I see in this thread that others have been removed from jury pool PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #622

Very welcome clarification. A little good will and common courtesy will go a long way. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Jun 2016 #205

Oops!! Must mean "From NOW on...." 7962 Jun 2016 #262

Actually she meant Doctor_J Jun 2016 #379

A description of your candidate's increasingly trail-worn appearance is no proof of ill-will, Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #488

He would have had a shit fit if someone said that about Hillary. demmiblue Jun 2016 #568

Sounds fair. JimDandy Jun 2016 #8

Oh thank you so much bravenak Jun 2016 #9

HEY sis... yuiyoshida Jun 2016 #313

I moved across town and have had so much stuff to do bravenak Jun 2016 #373

Having fun, sis... yuiyoshida Jun 2016 #685

What criticism of Bernie Sanders will be permitted? (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #10

We don't want people to tear down Bernie Sanders either. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #21

Thank you. -none Jun 2016 #208

Thank you! klook Jun 2016 #376

I don't think Bernie Sanders Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #455

Since Bernie will endorse Hillary around that point, there won't be much incentive to attack him. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #647

Thanks for the clarity. LP2K12 Jun 2016 #11

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #12

Advocating for him here would not be permitted. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #20

Of Course It Will billhicks76 Jun 2016 #540

We were referring to him as a third-party candidate hypothetically wyldwolf Jun 2016 #550

Semantics billhicks76 Jun 2016 #668

"advocating" as defined by the site owners. They won't argue semantics wyldwolf Jun 2016 #679

You Definitely Have An Attitude Problem billhicks76 Jun 2016 #700

Then he wouldn't be the DEm nom obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #23

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #134

So what? You can't advodate him on here obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #155

I'd think/hope that any advocacy of him in that case would be treated the same as... Tarc Jun 2016 #26

I agree advocating for Bernie would be advocating for someone other than the nominee Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #448

He's made clear that he's not going to do that. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #124

We don't permit people to support third-party spoilers. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #141

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #157

Not happening TeamPooka Jun 2016 #32

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #123

Did you not read Skinner's comments about civility? eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #158

Well, I believe that answers my question about what constitutes a "named removed" post. nt fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #327

Whoop, whoop, whoop, civility failure! Whoop, whoop.... FSogol Jun 2016 #191

I like Bernie. christx30 Jun 2016 #94

Very happy and excited about moving on. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #16

GOTV people! The White House and Senate can be ours! Maybe even The HOR! nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #18

And don't forget Supreme Court appointments! Fla Dem Jun 2016 #37

SCOTUS for our POTUS! nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #50

This would be so great if we could take back Congress Karma13612 Jun 2016 #42

I don't think anyone would disagree with you, Karma NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #271

+1000!! eom Karma13612 Jun 2016 #289

You and me both! nt fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #333

Fair enough. (eom) oasis Jun 2016 #19

What are the implications of groups like Socialist Progressives & the Populist Reform? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #22

You can't advocate for third parties anywhere on DU. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #34

Of course, but that is not the point of my question. I am talking about reform inside the party. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #55

Only my reading from above, if the critisicm is presented helpful way to help the nominee and still_one Jun 2016 #108

You are mistaken. The general election does not arrive until AFTER the convention. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #24

Well y'know, the Democratic Underground is not, in fact, a democracy Tarc Jun 2016 #40

The Democratic Underground Terms of Service state that we transition to the general election... Skinner Jun 2016 #45

Only if one of the candidates concedes. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #86

Yes, I want to stick with my rules. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #138

What if the FBI recommends that Hillary be indicted after the D.C. vote but before the convention Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #173

Obviously our policy would change if the nominee changes. Skinner Jun 2016 #181

Yes but how should we treat such articles or newscasts as they would no doubt have the effect Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #185

I'm sure you can figure out a way to do it... Skinner Jun 2016 #194

I know you have great expectations for Hillary and you don't believe she will be indicted, Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #206

I posted a reply to myself in error, so I'll post it again passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #276

fair enough passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #148

It's "his" site. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #385

The majority are more Clinton supporters or people who are able accept the reality Of this race. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #466

Well, as I posted above, according to the rules, the Democratic nominee will NOT be clear pdsimdars Jun 2016 #88

Wrong. The nominee will be clear when one of them concedes. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #129

Please see comment #62 . . . those are the facts, as opposed to your opinions. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #196

Eggs and Chickens, Dude hootinholler Jun 2016 #226

Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot. MADem Jun 2016 #97

"Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot." Your exact statement explicitly says that there... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #136

She is the "presumptive nominee." She has been for some time now. MADem Jun 2016 #197

She is the "presumptive nominee." TimPlo Jun 2016 #425

Excuse me, but the phrase means the same thing it has meant for over a half century. MADem Jun 2016 #532

The AP will call her the presumptive nominee when she has the "magic number" pnwmom Jun 2016 #542

"Presumptive nominee" is nothing new. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #676

There has never been a nominee before a convention...by definition. You are not making news. tritsofme Jun 2016 #251

The nomination does not depend on pledged delegates alone. charlyvi Jun 2016 #150

Please see comment #62 . . . those are the facts, not your opinions. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #192

It's not my "opinion". It's how every election has gone since supers were introduced. charlyvi Jun 2016 #246

Did you even bother to read what THEY say about it? Not that we don't all think your opinion pdsimdars Jun 2016 #259

The Associated Press is going to call it for Hillary when she has the majority pnwmom Jun 2016 #543

Like they say, we can have our own opinions but not our own facts Read #62 pdsimdars Jun 2016 #265

blah, blah, blah, excuse, excuse, excuse. . . . . . make up your own little fantasy world, but pdsimdars Jun 2016 #605

fact puffy socks Jun 2016 #298

Just read what they have to say. I put it in post #62 pdsimdars Jun 2016 #261

It is unclear ... barrow-wight Jun 2016 #383

You're mistaken too. The nomination has never needed to be secured with pledged delegates alone. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #503

Well, that's not what the DNC has said about it. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #597

That IS in fact what the DNC has said about it. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #675

Do you read? pdsimdars Jun 2016 #680

An opinion piece is not "what the DNC says officially." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #684

June 15 will be like the movie The Purge Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25

DU posts will drop in half without the RW smears and sources. LonePirate Jun 2016 #27

I'm totally fine with that. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #48

They will pick back up. wildeyed Jun 2016 #210

Yup. Agschmid Jun 2016 #435

"Glorious." You keep using that word; I do not think it means what you think it means... petronius Jun 2016 #28

Criticism of Hillary Clinton will only be permitted OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #29

I think you should start a site called Helping The Public Underground. Demit Jun 2016 #100

If you think being anti-Dem for the GE is "helping the public" bettyellen Jun 2016 #116

That's right. This site is to help the Democratic nominee, and all Democrats win in the November still_one Jun 2016 #188

Change the name to Establishment Echo Chamber OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #199

Then why hang around? The TOS is clear and has been clear for years. MH1 Jun 2016 #386

Democratic National Convention, July 25-28, 2016 the nominee will be known Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #300

Yeah, change the name to "establishment echo chamber" from BS echo chamber.. lol Cha Jun 2016 #497

KICK & REC!!! still_one Jun 2016 #499

well take comfort azurnoir Jun 2016 #228

That is straight forward. This site will serve to promote her. "Presumptive glinda Jun 2016 #504

Should Sanders manage the biggest comeback of all time and win the nomination the same rules apply. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #505

Then the problem isn't this site, OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #553

I hope that the "right-wing source" rule will be enforced Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #30

It will be enforced. Skinner Jun 2016 #51

Awesome! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #57

Thank you Skinner. riversedge Jun 2016 #233

Excellent! Thanks Skinner n/t NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #273

that's great Skinner. OKNancy Jun 2016 #280

What if the source is critisizing Trump. I've seen red state have anti Trump articles. DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #365

I totally agree. n/t demmiblue Jun 2016 #59

It's not logical to lump together all right-wing sources. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #67

It is if you've been monitoring them for 20 years... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #89

IMHO there is no scenario where WND needs to be a source Renew Deal Jun 2016 #92

Do you oppose quoting WND in the specific circumstance I mentioned? If so, why? (n/t) Jim Lane Jun 2016 #110

Look for other sources... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #120

It's not my call but i don't have an issue with true mockery of exposure. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #121

I would say if it is a news story from the WSJ ,it really should be fine. However, if it is an still_one Jun 2016 #213

I'd be more permissive than that. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #240

I feel sorry for people who think the WSJ is "right wing" 7962 Jun 2016 #269

The editorial/opinion page is for the most part right wing. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #631

Precisely. And we couldnt link editorials on LBN anyway. 7962 Jun 2016 #651

Are you aware of who owns the WSJ? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #639

The news reporting is not the same as the op-ed page. 7962 Jun 2016 #653

DUers routinely use the WSJ op-ed page as a source. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #665

Thats why I dont post opinion pieces. I can write my own opinion! 7962 Jun 2016 #677

Agree Renew Deal Jun 2016 #85

As soon as I see those URL's, I will go looking for a more mainstream source... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #115

global research. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #238

Infowars Renew Deal Jun 2016 #243

I missed that one. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #248

Yeah, using those as sources used to get you half-way to a tombstone Maeve Jun 2016 #255

And they're still terrible sources. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #258

OMG, I'm so with you on that one!!! Amimnoch Jun 2016 #133

Could we have a list of unacceptable sources? femmocrat Jun 2016 #135

It would be helpful, but just googling them will show their slant... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #177

Not to mention Breitbart News! Breitbart! eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #169

Yep! One of the worst of the worst! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #183

100% Agree LP2K12 Jun 2016 #236

sounds fair to me. zappaman Jun 2016 #33

Would that extend to more local politics. Bad Dog Jun 2016 #35

This announcement is about the presidential. Skinner Jun 2016 #56

There will be an exception for those races with no Democrat running, correct? MohRokTah Jun 2016 #229

Will there any special cases? Bad Dog Jun 2016 #533

100% for the Democratic Nominee and Party. 100% against the Republican Nominee and Party. onehandle Jun 2016 #36

I really do hope that you come down hard on The Yellow Button Brigade. demmiblue Jun 2016 #39

We are going to insist that people follow our rules. Skinner Jun 2016 #75

Yes it was a slap in the face and changed my attitude about this forum. Purveyor Jun 2016 #142

Godspeed. Mosby Jun 2016 #252

That post is as appropriate today as it was the day I posted it. eom Purveyor Jun 2016 #331

I can live with this however I have a question about down jwirr Jun 2016 #43

Why not? joshcryer Jun 2016 #58

That is what I do. I did it last election season, and I am still here. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2016 #70

as long as they are dems, why not? larkrake Jun 2016 #77

As long as they are running in Democratic primaries: Go for it. Skinner Jun 2016 #78

Good stuff. joshcryer Jun 2016 #46

Thank you for your announcement and the promise of more guidelines. I do have a couple of questions. FourScore Jun 2016 #47

The primaries end on DU when the voting is done... Skinner Jun 2016 #81

But some of the Hillary supporters still REALLY believe she will be the nominee, FourScore Jun 2016 #125

Thanks Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 #49

Tks Skinner. Hoping for the best of DU. 7wo7rees Jun 2016 #52

I appreciate your clarification passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #53

Everyone knows who the nominee is going to be. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #84

No they don't. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #102

Patience, Grasshopper. n/t FourScore Jun 2016 #140

I posted the how the Democratic party makes the decision in post #62. And it won't happen pdsimdars Jun 2016 #202

It is also a FACT that in every election since 1984, that the winner has been called pnwmom Jun 2016 #314

Yes, they do. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #399

Schmooze Much? billhicks76 Jun 2016 #544

Even if he wins every remaining contest, barrow-wight Jun 2016 #547

Hillary Should Of Course Offer Bernie The VP Slot billhicks76 Jun 2016 #555

I don't hate that idea. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #556

Omg! Go to another site if you can't deal with the rules. Isn't there some Sanders site? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #457

I'm just saying. . . if you want to keep this site firmly rooted in the REAL WORLD, you might pdsimdars Jun 2016 #599

No. The majority of your revenue-generating membership on DU disagrees with your... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #162

The rules were stated very clearly when general election mode goes into effect. June 16th. Lets still_one Jun 2016 #250

That's not "how it works" here. Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #260

There is the AP tracker that shows Hillary only needs 71 pledged delegates pnwmom Jun 2016 #317

Please stop arguing with the owner of this site. So disrespectful. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #461

Uuummmmm...no. Just because he is the owner, that doesn't make him immune to... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #615

There are a lot of Bernie supporters who still believe he will be the nominee. totodeinhere Jun 2016 #460

Huh??? Not everyone "knows" that (including me)! n/t baran Jun 2016 #493

No they don't. You said so yourself, with this: bvf Jun 2016 #525

I, for one, can't wait until this primary is over... MrScorpio Jun 2016 #54

And you gave no indication as to what happens to the website if Bernie wins the contested convention retrowire Jun 2016 #60

Actually you're wrong. We know exactly what would happen. Skinner Jun 2016 #90

I would hope it's that simple. retrowire Jun 2016 #122

It is not arrogant for me to say I know what the DU policy would be under that circumstance. Skinner Jun 2016 #131

My comment about the arrogance was about anyone knowing the outcome retrowire Jun 2016 #144

My two cents. The TOS is stating the convention is just a formality because after the still_one Jun 2016 #270

There won't be a contested convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #529

OK, but... SandersDem Jun 2016 #61

Hillary Clinton is almost certain to be the nominee. Skinner Jun 2016 #95

Thank you SandersDem Jun 2016 #109

I think what many on this thread are pointing out LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #329

Are you "almost certain" that you will survive till dinner time or is it definite? Renew Deal Jun 2016 #589

I never took it to a life and death question LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #692

So it's just going to be an all in for Hillary from June 16 until Bernie clinches the nomination in Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #406

You are tired of people bashing each other. Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #63

+1 demmiblue Jun 2016 #66

That horse has left the barn. Skinner Jun 2016 #99

Who opened the barn door? bvf Jun 2016 #546

Yes, I did. And I am responsible. Skinner Jun 2016 #558

Yes please, that was a huge mistake Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #174

Why? Because the jury hunters lost their effectiveness? onehandle Jun 2016 #279

No because a lot of people with 10 plus hides Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #380

Thank you Skinner redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #64

Works for me Warpy Jun 2016 #65

Woohooo! Agschmid Jun 2016 #68

This will not end well without a purge. AngryAmish Jun 2016 #69

Not needed. Once Hillary get's protected status we have plenty of other sites to choose from. harun Jun 2016 #634

I've posted before that I didn't believe in any so-called "purge." cwydro Jun 2016 #71

No bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election ! Her Sister Jun 2016 #72

Well stat3d laserhaas Jun 2016 #74

Just Want to Say That On the Road Jun 2016 #79

You are very kind. Skinner Jun 2016 #106

Don't know how you do it..... kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #468

I appreciate learning the historical facts of all political leaders, including the bad and the ugly. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #80

You will probably be disappointed then because "historical" postings pnwmom Jun 2016 #319

The way I read it, they will be if the posts stick to the facts lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #442

No -- and I've been here through other campaigns. You will learn otherwise. pnwmom Jun 2016 #478

No, they won't, sorry obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #619

Thanks so much. Cannot wait till communit standards mean something again! bettyellen Jun 2016 #83

Thank you Skinner. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #87

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #91

Good post. Very reasonable. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #93

It's great to hear this will all be over soon. Chemisse Jun 2016 #98

Good work, Skinner. It I a appreciated. floriduck Jun 2016 #101

So I guess we will not be allowed Cryptoad Jun 2016 #103

No, it won't. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #112

OK,,,,,, I'll be glad to see DU get back to its old standards.....nt Cryptoad Jun 2016 #126

...says the person with (at least) TEN recent hides. Please find a mirror and re-read Skinner's FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #330

But we can be thrilled as F about HRC clinching it without fear of nasty attacks! bettyellen Jun 2016 #156

*Points at Cryptoad and looks at Skinner* retrowire Jun 2016 #128

Like skinnner said,,,,,, Cryptoad Jun 2016 #149

Just stop making comments like we Bernie supporters deserve our noses put in dog shit retrowire Jun 2016 #153

u seem to have tunnel vision..... Cryptoad Jun 2016 #170

*facepalm* nt retrowire Jun 2016 #171

Why say it at all? I mean really. JEB Jun 2016 #337

Is it really that hard not to be a jerk? Marrah_G Jun 2016 #179

breath deep,,,, let all come out,,,,,,,,! Cryptoad Jun 2016 #182

Whichever candidate you support, I assure you that you can find many jerks among your allies. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #215

Agreed Marrah_G Jun 2016 #216

Not often is there a post where I can say SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #104

Thanks. HuckleB Jun 2016 #113

K&R PatSeg Jun 2016 #114

Aww. You're no fun pscot Jun 2016 #119

Clear enough and sounds fair. Duval Jun 2016 #127

The Convention occurs in July. The Nominee is not chosen until the Convention actually votes. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #130

Issues are different than attacking our candidate, or other DUers..... bettyellen Jun 2016 #163

Evidently you don't read my posts. You assume animosity where none exists. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #264

"Some of us" are on a pretty high horse and if they continue to denigrate others here.... bettyellen Jun 2016 #285

Thanks, I cannot wait ghostsinthemachine Jun 2016 #132

Thanks, Skinner PJMcK Jun 2016 #139

Sounds good to me. Thank you. yardwork Jun 2016 #143

So will neo-Nazi websites still be valid? angrychair Jun 2016 #151

neo-Nazi websites will not be permitted. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #154

Thanks, Skinner. The 16th can't come quickly enough! greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #152

I think most of the Hillary Bernie bashing has been done by GOP rent a trolls who joined in the last Monk06 Jun 2016 #160

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #161

This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Jun 2016 #165

This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Jun 2016 #166

Lol Skinner Jun 2016 #167

I'm feeling a lot better about this place. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #172

This message was self-deleted by its author retrowire Jun 2016 #184

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #201

he doesn't "require" voting for anyone specifically charlyvi Jun 2016 #217

Read it your self SusanLarson Jun 2016 #230

You have to be smarter than that charlyvi Jun 2016 #268

"must support". Did not say "Must vote for.." 7962 Jun 2016 #283

If you want to associate with this website, that is Skinner's requirement. But pnwmom Jun 2016 #304

I think we should encourage the poster to go the FBI still_one Jun 2016 #408

Only if I can be there to see the look on the faces of the FBI agents who have to respond mythology Jun 2016 #447

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHahahahah! barrow-wight Jun 2016 #412

.. Cha Jun 2016 #604

This message was self-deleted by its author steve2470 Jun 2016 #628

You are being silly Marrah_G Jun 2016 #221

This message was self-deleted by its author Amimnoch Jun 2016 #257

Under the constitution we all have a right to Freedom of Association and Skinner pnwmom Jun 2016 #303

SOP/ TOS sheshe2 Jun 2016 #338

Hell to the yeah! JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #343

Some posters are just dying to proclaim: "Armen Tamzarian's reign of terror is over!!" (eom) StevieM Jun 2016 #354

Some have their own "special" rules I guess. I'll throw in a donation to DU on that post just for still_one Jun 2016 #397

"If get banned for who I support or will not support I personally will file a complaint with the Cha Jun 2016 #531

This is a private site, you have no "rights" here Marrah_G Jun 2016 #175

Gee, now I hope you don't get banned. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #186

I hope it will not be necessary SusanLarson Jun 2016 #218

No one is holding a "banning" over your head. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #263

I'll be waiting for the indictment! LOL charlyvi Jun 2016 #272

I wonder if Skinner ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #290

ROFL OKNancy Jun 2016 #307

I'll start a GoFundMe for his bail and legal fees. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #325

BaJeysus. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #342

Oooooohhh!! bravenak Jun 2016 #370

ROFL! "Disgruntled Member Brings DU to it's Knees - Seeks One Million 'RECs' in Compensation!" Cha Jun 2016 #472

Hey Susan... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #320

I think she should be encouraged to go to the FBI on this one. still_one Jun 2016 #410

Skinner's rules are for the DU forum, not for the voting booth. You can, of course, vote for whom uppityperson Jun 2016 #332

"I hope it will not be necessary" barrow-wight Jun 2016 #416

Lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #419

Ooooh! The FBI! missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #211

If it happens we will see. SusanLarson Jun 2016 #227

I am an attorney. missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #234

I really think she should be encouraged to go to the FBI on this still_one Jun 2016 #413

I know, right? missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #426

me too, because it was classic still_one Jun 2016 #440

I bookmarked that comic gem rbrnmw Jun 2016 #479

if for nothing else, these are gems. Thanks still_one Jun 2016 #482

Hmmm. I wonder if anyone has heard from diabeticman lately. . . . missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #649

Freedom of association is a constitutional right.... Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #281

This site is about supporting Democrats. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #367

I so would like to see the FBI's response to your complaint. cwydro Jun 2016 #577

SKINNER HAS BEEN INDICTED FOR COERCING PEOPLE INTO FOLLOWING THE RULES OF HIS WEBSITE. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #311

CALL CONGRESS RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! uppityperson Jun 2016 #326

KICK & REC!!!!!!!!! still_one Jun 2016 #415

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!11!!!2 NobodyHere Jun 2016 #673

Wow, that was quick still_one Jun 2016 #414

Um, that US code does not apply to the rules of this site. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #247

Not long before your grave dancing gifs have to go. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #355

If my gifs have to go, your bug gifs have to go. eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #359

My bug gif isn't grave dancing (for months) in celebration of losing a long-time DUer. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #384

Your bug gif celebrates a long time disruptor banned for violations of TOS MohRokTah Jun 2016 #387

Nope. but thanks for playing. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #388

We;ll see how Skinner lets it play out. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #398

I'm pretty sure he won't allow grave dancing. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #407

I'm pretty sure he won't allow Troll celebrating MohRokTah Jun 2016 #409

Not celebrating a troll. Countering Grave dancing. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #454

The troll celebrating started after the troll was banned. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #462

If you supported the admins, you wouldn't actively try to make DU suck Gore1FL Jun 2016 #467

i dance on no graves. I swat the flies of troll celebrators. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #476

Good grief. Cary Jun 2016 #249

Overheated melodrama. Weak grasp of law, history or reality. Let me guess.... Sanders supporter? Number23 Jun 2016 #287

'bye, Walt. n/t winter is coming Jun 2016 #293

LOL, good one. nt MH1 Jun 2016 #401

LOL - I've been here since 2001 and I don't think I've ever read anything so hilarious OKNancy Jun 2016 #301

This is either hilarious deadpan Walt-Starr-evoking humor, or quite simply nuts. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #310

Thanks for the update RockaFowler Jun 2016 #164

My suggestion to those who do not support the nominee is this: Marrah_G Jun 2016 #168

I hope that "support" means, essentially, "not oppose" Jim Lane Jun 2016 #176

You're alright, Skinner ejbr Jun 2016 #180

Thanks again, Skinner! Maeve Jun 2016 #187

Hmmm..... Fine. desmiller Jun 2016 #189

OK Dad, we will try to do better and stop bickering like three year olds. wildeyed Jun 2016 #190

If people here want to vote for Jill Stein, then say hello to President Trump NYCButterfinger Jun 2016 #193

That depends on how many vote for Gary Johnson. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #431

DU is a great site. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #195

Personally, I can live with most of that. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #203

If whoever wins is not the person I want, I'll remove myself from that election. PatrynXX Jun 2016 #204

But... the primary ends at the Convention... modestybl Jun 2016 #207

Thanks for the update and keep up the good work. FSogol Jun 2016 #209

DU without standards lost the very unique qualities that make it worthwhile. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #212

It would be wiser to wait until the July 25 convention chooses nominee. /nt philly_bob Jun 2016 #219

I welcome the end of the Fight Club silliness herding cats Jun 2016 #222

First, thank you for the return of courtesy as a community standard. IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #223

Up thread Skinner already said no how, no where. bettyellen Jun 2016 #492

Any post about a candidate (and if only positive) goes out into cyberspace. glinda Jun 2016 #513

It will be interesting to see if this site can be the haven that it was after "W"'s election... Walk away Jun 2016 #225

Acknowledged. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #231

Sounds good. MineralMan Jun 2016 #232

Incidentally, Dr Strange keeps leaving the toilet seat up. Orrex Jun 2016 #235

What if you want to help Bernie and not Clinton to succeed in winning the nomination? imagine2015 Jun 2016 #237

Skinner thanks for being so fair, I am hard-core Bernie supporter but your rules make sense n/t davidlynch Jun 2016 #239

focus on Trump. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #241

Goodbye Democratic Underground McKim Jun 2016 #242

Later! wysi Jun 2016 #358

And your observation of Trump is that he's a hippie peace freak MH1 Jun 2016 #404

You won't have to worry Reter Jun 2016 #418

get ready to be shocked AntiBank Jun 2016 #578

that you for the cool head..... chillfactor Jun 2016 #245

I look foward to the day the vitriol here ends. I know i had my part in making DU suck and i hope DU hrmjustin Jun 2016 #253

Glad there will be no purges. zentrum Jun 2016 #266

I promise... ReRe Jun 2016 #267

I am looking forward to June 16 Gothmog Jun 2016 #274

Good stuff, and right at the heart of what has become a patisanship emphesis on bashing .... marble falls Jun 2016 #275

Thanks, Skinner and DU Admins tandot Jun 2016 #277

Thank you, Skinner. Very much appreciated. ((nt) Paladin Jun 2016 #278

My only concern is biased juries liberal N proud Jun 2016 #282

I know it'll all be ok annabanana Jun 2016 #284

Thanks for putting up with us! complain jane Jun 2016 #291

In a year when there is bound to be questions up until the convention, why would you start this... Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #295

YAY! Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #297

I feel that way, too. It's difficult. Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #422

It doesn't really matter if the nominee "isn't clear" by the 16th... JHB Jun 2016 #299

Can I get unbanned from the Hillary group? I will support the nominee. ALBliberal Jun 2016 #302

You need to reach out directly to the person who blocked you JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #349

I guess I will reach out again ALBliberal Jun 2016 #382

Why? JTFrog Jun 2016 #508

I was banned unfairly with a waving.smiley face. That's not a jab. That ALBliberal Jun 2016 #607

You were banned for your disparaging remarks. JTFrog Jun 2016 #686

Oh and who spent hours lined up here in Albuquerque to get her signature ALBliberal Jun 2016 #698

This message was self-deleted by its author MerryBlooms Jun 2016 #305

This might clear up the mystery. pnwmom Jun 2016 #340

This message was self-deleted by its author MerryBlooms Jun 2016 #345

The problem here is I lost jury duty and was no where near guilty of what was described. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #438

If you've actually been removed from the jury pool ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #566

On April 27 we exchanged two PMs. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #595

Yes ... I am all powerful. :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #598

Evidenly so. I'm done. eom PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #602

I think that's a smart decision ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #606

I continue to think the place needs fumigation. I hear TrollAway works wonders. Stinky The Clown Jun 2016 #306

Nice post Adolph. I'm alerting this! progressoid Jun 2016 #309

OK guys. TBF Jun 2016 #312

Thank you and question tammywammy Jun 2016 #318

Based on this thread, it has never been more apparent... wyldwolf Jun 2016 #321

Nail. ----> Head. AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #391

^^^This!^^^ Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #512

Thanks for laying it Wibly Jun 2016 #323

I think we should wait until something is official at the convention mvd Jun 2016 #395

You're a good soul, Skinner. Thanks and best of luck. Hekate Jun 2016 #334

Heh! flying rabbit Jun 2016 #335

My favorite post is #82. rug Jun 2016 #339

You sre a good man, Skinner libodem Jun 2016 #341

What about Pro-Sanders avatars and sig lines? They will still be permitted right? liberalnarb Jun 2016 #344

For some reason I think they will be gone as well as the Bernie Group? If that is how the die falls. glinda Jun 2016 #519

My expectation is that it will get truebluegreen Jun 2016 #347

^^That^^ onecaliberal Jun 2016 #421

Well spoken, Skinner. Adsos Letter Jun 2016 #348

This is excellent but you didn't address the real problem postatomic Jun 2016 #353

As one who has been here almost since the beginning Loki Jun 2016 #356

But what if.... Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #361

Cool. Hey can you tell me why my profile page says the Hillary Clinton Group is my favorite? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #362

Uh, your profile page shows that UtahLib Jun 2016 #437

Here are your posts in the Hillary Group tammywammy Jun 2016 #465

K&R... spanone Jun 2016 #363

Thank you Skinner! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #364

I'm in MFM008 Jun 2016 #371

I am looking forward to this. It's the way it should have been all along. stevenleser Jun 2016 #389

Thanks for the update Dem2 Jun 2016 #393

Thanks for the clarification and for letting us use your forum. uppityperson Jun 2016 #394

The divisions are deep and fundamental zeemike Jun 2016 #396

Will advocating that super-delegates vote for Bernie be allowed? jg10003 Jun 2016 #400

I think it's clear from the above announcement that it is not. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #471

advertising glinda Jun 2016 #520

I don't recall anyone caring about any of them since Nader. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #526

This is the Democratic Party. A little something called democracy also matters. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #528

Skinner: If Hillary Clinton has trouble with the law i.e., investigation, FBI, DOJ and she is bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #402

okay, so I have one week left to bash people here. Bucky Jun 2016 #403

I would hope so. rug Jun 2016 #420

Generally speaking, I think the terms of service are not well understood... CBHagman Jun 2016 #417

Agreed. Or "the other post is worse so I'm not hiding this one" which just leads to the escalation seaglass Jun 2016 #562

Its like herding cattle. Go Vols Jun 2016 #428

This sounds very reasonable to me. k&r DesertRat Jun 2016 #432

Thank you for the time... deathrind Jun 2016 #433

cool blogslut Jun 2016 #436

Thank you, Skinner! R&K nt longship Jun 2016 #444

Thanks Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #446

Thanks for spelling it all out! ucrdem Jun 2016 #451

My prediction.... Gary Johnson and Jill Stein alittlelark Jun 2016 #452

Well Jill Stein should not be discussed in the GE Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #459

As I read it, advocacy for Stein is barred but that doesn't mean she can't be discussed. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #473

Advocated for here... no. mwooldri Jun 2016 #474

I agree nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #489

Your fatal flaw like most anti Hillary people here is that you think your opinion is matched by a upaloopa Jun 2016 #486

Not going to happen. Johnson got 1% in 2012, Stein got a total of 450k votes TwilightZone Jun 2016 #630

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #458

This is very disappointing, I feel that you are trying to direct the discussion in favor of Hilary. DrewFlorida Jun 2016 #463

How is it possible for Bernie to win? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #470

pretty much the only way he can is for the FBI to recommend an indictment before the convention AntiBank Jun 2016 #585

Nope, Skinner and DU always try to direct discussion in favor of the Democratic nominee. stevenleser Jun 2016 #584

Sounds good ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #469

Very Reasonable Oixi1993 Jun 2016 #475

hi newbie! glinda Jun 2016 #524

That leads to a question. RandySF Jun 2016 #477

I'm looking forward to general election on DU. bobGandolf Jun 2016 #480

Looking forward to seeing how this works out on DU goldent Jun 2016 #481

Thank you, Skinner, I'm rooting for a better and stronger DU. eom UtahLib Jun 2016 #484

I'm calling Congress and the FBI RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!111!! zappaman Jun 2016 #506

Like I've said in responce to every other thread that has announced Clinton prematurely Lordquinton Jun 2016 #510

Excellent proud patriot Jun 2016 #515

Great! Now we can all get down to the real business of totally trouncing Trump. In_The_Wind Jun 2016 #554

Why Not Wait Until The Convention When It Is Finally Decided? I'm an Old Fart Land of Enchantment Jun 2016 #560

It'll definitely be interesting Dorian Gray Jun 2016 #561

June 16 is too soon. GE mode should be for when we have a nominee - which will be in July. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #563

The AP will call the election by June 7, when Hillary wins the majority pnwmom Jun 2016 #565

superdelegates will not be committed until July. If the AP wants to presume a lot, Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #623

Superdelegates are committed whenever they decide that they're committed. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #662

The AP doesn't "lean" any way. They'll be following their STANDARD procedure. pnwmom Jun 2016 #664

Maybe I will come by more often. JNelson6563 Jun 2016 #567

And that would be a GOOD thing! Maeve Jun 2016 #573

Hi Maeve! JNelson6563 Jun 2016 #710

Guidance on prohibited "meta-discussions" anyone? Not sure I understand. n/t MrModerate Jun 2016 #570

Meta-discussions are those about the board Maeve Jun 2016 #572

Ah, I was afraid it was a prohibition against . . . MrModerate Jun 2016 #709

i hope everyone reads and takes this to heart. barbtries Jun 2016 #574

Sounds about right... The_Commonist Jun 2016 #579

So, at what point can Bernie supporters tell Hillary supporters, 'told you so'? Dawgs Jun 2016 #580

But I really, really, REALLY wanna purge! MoonRiver Jun 2016 #581

All I ask is that the targeting of black DUers end. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2016 #587

YES. betsuni Jun 2016 #592

Yup, Hillary supporters in General, black DUers in particular. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #642

So if it's "support Hillary or else" here at DU nyabingi Jun 2016 #600

"unfortunate enough for her to become president" Maven Jun 2016 #620

I'd be happy to explain nyabingi Jun 2016 #707

"if we're unfortunate enough for her to become president" obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #621

It would be unfortunate for either to be president nyabingi Jun 2016 #706

Yeah, that isn't what that statement means obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #708

You sound like a Trump supporter Democat Jun 2016 #637

I put Hillary and Donald on about the same level nyabingi Jun 2016 #705

wise choice considering the other responses stupidicus Jun 2016 #643

Message Received lpbk2713 Jun 2016 #616

I hope you are going to do something about the repeat offenders you keep allowing back Rex Jun 2016 #633

Do we have any more flexibility in what we can say within the Bernie Group? JudyM Jun 2016 #635

Point Taken colsohlibgal Jun 2016 #636

Looking forward to the changes. LynneSin Jun 2016 #638

Perhaps you can add an appropriate check box to the alert? The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #640

That's actually a really good idea! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #646

We are completely changing the way we run the site. Skinner Jun 2016 #656

Thanks The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #693

So sad to see the Freepers go. ffr Jun 2016 #652

You mean people who want universal healthcare, less war, no torture, no capital punishment, Doctor_J Jun 2016 #689

I'm ok with Hillary and I will vote for her. DocMac Jun 2016 #658

Glad to see this happening, Skinner. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #660

thank you and I love you! renate Jun 2016 #661

Why is there no paragraph about what criticism will and will not be allowed for Bernie? cui bono Jun 2016 #670

Interesting. H2O Man Jun 2016 #672

The tos say that we're allowed to be liberal. That will conflict starkly with Mrs Clinton's views Doctor_J Jun 2016 #690

I'm complete down with and looking forward to the transition SaschaHM Jun 2016 #691

So when Clinton loses the General Election RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #694

Skinner, please see my OP, "What about an "anyone but Clinton or Sanders" scenario? Peace Patriot Jun 2016 #703

Congratulations, I think this beat even Kudzu uppityperson Jun 2016 #711

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #713