Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Announcements

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Skinner

(63,645 posts)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 05:31 PM Jun 2016

About the upcoming transition to general election season [View all]

This discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the Announcements group).

There has been a lot of talk on DU lately about the fact that we are nearing the end of the primaries. As you probably know this issue has been raised a few times in the Ask the Administrators forum. I figure it might be helpful to re-post some of my comments out here in the Announcements forum so they get a wider audience.


Timing (link)

After the primaries on June 7 (California, New Jersey, etc.) we will announce that the primaries are nearing an end, and members will have one more week to "get it out of their systems."

The final Democratic presidential primary is Tuesday, June 14 in Washington DC. People will have one last glorious day of primary season on June 15, and then Democratic Underground general election season begins on Thursday, June 16.


What to expect (link)

I think a lot of people have the wrong idea, and are going to be disappointed.

We have no intention of purging anyone, and we have no intention of disallowing good-faith discussion of the issues. I think most people are going to be fine with that. But there are going to be a a few people (including both Hillary and Bernie supporters) who are going to be disappointed because the massive crackdown they have been hoping for does not come to pass.

Most people think the big change coming in general election season is that people on this website will need to stop bashing Hillary Clinton. Yes, that's part of it -- but it's not the only thing and it's definitely not the most important thing. The really big change coming in general election season is that people on this website will need to stop bashing each other.

Throughout this primary season we have been in a death spiral of declining standards. So we are going to institute some rules, and we will expect everyone to follow those rules, and we will expect everyone to enforce those rules when they serve on juries. The rules shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone -- they are mostly common sense, and they are basically the same rules we had for years when we had moderators: No personal attacks, no broad-brush group attacks, no bigotry, no right-wing smears or sources against Democrats, no advocating for spoilers or republicans, no meta-discussion, etc.

I am just so tired of people bashing each other and bashing Democrats on this website. I know the hardcore partisans will try to paint this whole thing through the Hillary vs Bernie lens, and drive that wedge as hard as they can, but that is just so not where I am at right now. I don't care who anyone has supported in the primaries -- I really don't. As long as you treat your fellow DU members with respect, stop tearing down Democratic public figures (including Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders and everyone else), and don't advocate for Donald Trump or some lost-cause third-party spoiler candidate, then you'll be fine.


What criticism of Hillary Clinton will be permitted? (link)

Unfortunately, there is not going to be a hard line between "fine" and "not fine."

But basically, I think it comes down to this:

If you are criticizing Hillary Clinton because you want to help her succeed, then you'll be fine. But if you are criticizing Hillary Clinton because you want to tear her down, then you won't be fine.

Now, I'm not a mind reader and I can't know for certain what everyone's intentions are. But I think that if the criticism is coming from a place of "wanting her to succeed" then that will be reflected in the tone and substance of the post. If the criticism is coming from a place of "wanting to tear her down" then that will be reflected in the tone and substance of the post. If you are here on DU then you are supposed to be supporting the Democratic nominee against the Republican nominee in the general election -- it shouldn't be very hard to write a post in a way that sounds like it.

I believe that it will be possible to discuss every substantive issue that DUers might want to discuss.


Anything else?

This should come as a surprise to exactly no one. Every four years when there is a presidential campaign Democratic Underground expects our members to support the nominee. It is written into our Terms of Service, which you agreed to when you joined:

Winning elections is important — therefore, advocating in favor of Republican nominees or in favor of third-party spoiler candidates that could split the vote and throw an election to our conservative opponents is never permitted on Democratic Underground. ... For presidential contests, election season begins when both major-party nominees become clear. For non-presidential contests, election season begins on Labor Day. Everyone here on DU needs to work together to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of American government. If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side.

We will be providing more details in the near future.
713 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for the post. TransitJohn Jun 2016 #1
I told people there would not be mass bannings RobertEarl Jun 2016 #44
The question is not going to come up. The question is: Can everyone unite and get out voters, so L. Coyote Jun 2016 #117
The political revolution is to change the status quo in the Dem Party, not to accept it. n/t JimDandy Jun 2016 #198
This is Democratic Underground louis c Jun 2016 #328
Exactly, this is Democratic Underground JimDandy Jun 2016 #350
Ultimately, this is whatever place Skinner decides it is. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #369
As long as you don't bash the Dem Party in order to harm it. Suggestions should be welcome. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #443
"underground" with respect to what, though? yodermon Jun 2016 #360
Democrats who are for the party and for the nominees to be elected. I don't think Dino is a term kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #445
louis c—I've seen what election ballots look like. CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #611
Tiny demurrer. IMO, the revolution is to change the status quo in the US merrily Jun 2016 #557
Skinner knows that Hillary is going to be our nominee, there was no headline about Bernie in the GE. dubyadiprecession Jun 2016 #429
Like that picture and your attitude. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #439
Pass it around. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #483
You can discuss it if you're not trashing her in the process. kstewart33 Jun 2016 #244
I think the post above makes it crystal clear. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #368
Still get elected? marions ghost Jun 2016 #516
I would prefer to cross that bridge when we come to it. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #517
You made the projection... marions ghost Jun 2016 #522
It's irrelevant how I see it at this point. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #527
You brought up the hypothetical of an indictment marions ghost Jun 2016 #530
He has addressed it. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #536
Where has Skinner said marions ghost Jun 2016 #539
Until such a thing actually happens, barrow-wight Jun 2016 #548
No One Indicted Can Win Let Alone Keep Running billhicks76 Jun 2016 #534
Well then I guess we shall see what happens. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #537
I'm Assuming She Won't Be Indicted billhicks76 Jun 2016 #545
The only fairytale barrow-wight Jun 2016 #549
Weapon? billhicks76 Jun 2016 #667
Why do fictional "indictments" always come up in discussions like this? George II Jun 2016 #609
It's last hope house. The very last chance. Laser102 Jun 2016 #624
K & R BootinUp Jun 2016 #2
It will be nice to focus on Trump, for sure n/t Godhumor Jun 2016 #3
Hear hear. christx30 Jun 2016 #73
Thank you, christx! NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #256
... BooScout Jun 2016 #288
Amen! Loki Jun 2016 #381
Mahalo, christx! Cha Jun 2016 #491
+1 Starry Messenger Jun 2016 #495
Thank-you christx still_one Jun 2016 #498
Best make that June 16th instead, TexasTowelie Jun 2016 #523
Yes, indeed. I agree completely. maddiemom Jun 2016 #666
If he is the nominee., I still think that won't happen, too demented and all. L. Coyote Jun 2016 #485
Will those of us who have been purged from the jury rolls Blue_In_AK Jun 2016 #4
Yes. Skinner Jun 2016 #15
I could never figure out why I was purged after the middle of March. Blue_In_AK Jun 2016 #38
Your profile says 100% chance of serving on juries mnhtnbb Jun 2016 #220
I get a jury notice every other day LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2016 #296
I sometimes get multiple jury requests in the same day! femmedem Jun 2016 #357
I get two a day every day because I sign on in the middle of the day when people are at work hollysmom Jun 2016 #366
I've wondered about this, also. enlightenment Jun 2016 #292
I went from one every day, sometimes even 2 arikara Jun 2016 #411
WoW! This happens? we want people to feel confident that they aren't being judged by trolls who" Her Sister Jun 2016 #41
Everything Seems Fair To Me billhicks76 Jun 2016 #214
Any say on what's going on with people who have racked up dozens of hides? Scootaloo Jun 2016 #456
Since the amnesty they've really felt free to rack up the hides Capt. Obvious Jun 2016 #590
Here's the problem. Will "both major party nominees" really become clear on June 16? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #5
It's clear now. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #13
No IT IS NOT CLEAR>>> As The Convention Is When And Where ALL Will Become CLEAR, NOT Before! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #294
It's very clear now wyldwolf Jun 2016 #316
Some People Can Foresee Problems When Others Cannot... Here Is One "Collection" Of Problems... CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #324
Mika is not part of the nominating process wyldwolf Jun 2016 #336
LOL! Plucketeer Jun 2016 #392
LOL! wyldwolf Jun 2016 #551
Enjoy your fantasy eom Plucketeer Jun 2016 #588
It appears it's the Bernie followers living in a fantasy world. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #614
OK....... Plucketeer Jun 2016 #618
This isn't your website. Skinner gets to decide. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #541
Quit Trying To Frame Reality For Us billhicks76 Jun 2016 #535
Someone needs a frame reality for you wyldwolf Jun 2016 #552
As Long As It's Not You billhicks76 Jun 2016 #671
Perhaps wyldwolf Jun 2016 #678
I'll Be Voting Democrat in Nov No Matter What billhicks76 Jun 2016 #697
Good. Because it doesn't really matter how little you know about the process... wyldwolf Jun 2016 #699
I Easily Know As Much As You billhicks76 Jun 2016 #702
Be careful with that chip on your shoulder Cary Jun 2016 #586
Typical Threats billhicks76 Jun 2016 #669
Threats? Cary Jun 2016 #696
Over People Saying Better Be Careful billhicks76 Jun 2016 #701
Wow. Cary Jun 2016 #704
And when you own the website, you can determine that. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #374
It says the 17th, NOT the convention. If you aren't happy, you may want to go to a Sanders site. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #450
It's CLEAR as far as DU is concerned. Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #712
+1!!!! n/t baran Jun 2016 #14
Jury: My 3yo alerted in this while playing with my iPad. Quackers Jun 2016 #82
lol Renew Deal Jun 2016 #107
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #146
Would your 3 year old.... HeartoftheMidwest Jun 2016 #346
Yes. Skinner Jun 2016 #17
Only to Hillary supporters. But the ACTUAL nominee can not be known until the convention. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #62
It seem to me Eko Jun 2016 #96
Your post reminds me of anti-vaxxer argument Renew Deal Jun 2016 #111
Your post reminds me of your hosting skills. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #147
Skinner pretty much gave you guys everything you want vdogg Jun 2016 #118
The post is wrong. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #159
Juror 7 has an opinion. AtheistCrusader Jun 2016 #145
Thank you juror #7. There seems to be a lot of censorship on this "democratic" site. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #200
This is a privately owned site that promotes Democrats barrow-wight Jun 2016 #377
How is this privately owned and run forum "democratic"? Perhaps a review of the About DU page is in uppityperson Jun 2016 #390
It's OK, if you want to make this a fantasy site, no problem. I don't own it. But I do own my pdsimdars Jun 2016 #603
I'm not sure you put that in the right place uppityperson Jun 2016 #632
I have NEVER said you can't set up the rules. You have made that up out of thin air. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #654
Again, wtf? I can't set up rules because I'm not Admin. Again with the snarky insults without uppityperson Jun 2016 #655
You're not interjecting thought, you're clinging to irrational bias Corporate666 Jun 2016 #688
All 7 jurors rightly said LEAVE IT ALONE.. Therefore you weren't "censored." emulatorloo Jun 2016 #627
Amen to that!! Glad to see a 0-7 smackdown. 7962 Jun 2016 #254
Just about every complain jane Jun 2016 #286
You can add me to your count. Stonepounder Jun 2016 #315
Look, I just posted what the standard is. If you want to rationalize or make excuses, that is pdsimdars Jun 2016 #594
The fat lady doesn't sing until the convention next month Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #629
Authoritarian? barrow-wight Jun 2016 #375
Anyone who thinks they can start an equivalent site, best of luck! L. Coyote Jun 2016 #487
I don't imagine it did. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #518
Ahem.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #430
Heh heh.... kjones Jun 2016 #596
That's the thing. The writer of that article lied about how the process works. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #500
You obviously didn't read with comprehension. The authore never asserted that. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #593
The vote of delegates ALWAYS determines the nominee. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #674
And they do not vote UNTIL THE CONVENTION. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #681
Hence the the term PRESUMPTIVE nominee. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #683
Your analysis is wrong-based on history Clinton will be the presumptive nominee on June 7 Gothmog Jun 2016 #583
Reality is good enough for me! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #610
If they come around DU criticizing the Democratic candidate, I'll invite them to Free Republican... Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2016 #76
I assume you mean Free Republic, truebluegreen Jun 2016 #352
I actually meant another place; but this isn't a religion discussion... Jeffersons Ghost Jun 2016 #405
No, it hasn't. "Apparent" or "Presumed"... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #105
Skinner thinks that's a good reason. And he gets to decide. n/t pnwmom Jun 2016 #322
+100! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #351
What part of that don't they understand?? This is Skinner's site, for chrissakes. And he's being BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #423
Yawn billhicks76 Jun 2016 #538
And hence the problem. seekthetruth Jun 2016 #137
"it's been a nasty experience being a member of DU AND being a supporter of Sanders." tarheelsunc Jun 2016 #308
+1000 barrow-wight Jun 2016 #378
+ 2000 eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #424
I know, right? They have the majority of the board, ruled the jury pool.. "85%" .. we got Cha Jun 2016 #511
I thank the heavens for the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama Groups. I'd otherwise not come to BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #569
I wouldn't be @ DU if it weren't for The BOG, Hill's Gr, or the AA GR, either.. Cha Jun 2016 #571
The pretend or real misunderstanding of both "Democratic" and "Underground" betsuni Jun 2016 #576
Oh, it sinks in all right. Make no mistake and think otherwise. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #591
++++++1000~ sheshe2 Jun 2016 #663
It's only the past 2wks to a month that Clinton supporters were not being beat up on, alerted kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #453
Been banned, ignored and had a few hidden posts. seekthetruth Jun 2016 #464
That's the way it's been with my few "hides"... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #682
Well said, tarheelsunc.. We're tough enough! Cha Jun 2016 #501
+30000 treestar Jun 2016 #564
Ain't that the truth George II Jun 2016 #608
Thank-you. still_one Jun 2016 #613
+1...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #625
+3,000. nt MADem Jun 2016 #626
+10^10^100 It's hard to imagine how some folks can be so unaware of what's happening around them stevenleser Jun 2016 #645
Yeah shenmue Jun 2016 #657
this is how i see it too, seekthetruth. nt hopemountain Jun 2016 #449
In the end, there's always one candidate who wins and the rest who don't. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #496
Superdelegates vote at the convention. Not over till then. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #502
All delegates vote at the convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #507
Exactly, as you say, it ain't over till it's over, and this looks like a mighty long game from where highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #509
There's 13 days left until all primaries are concluded. At that point there's no more "game" left. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #514
As if DU was the only game in town, first of all. Secondly, the feelings and expression of at least highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #521
It's so unfair that the majority didn't vote for Sanders Cary Jun 2016 #575
What majority? seekthetruth Jun 2016 #641
I don't have "a candidate." Cary Jun 2016 #648
It's not a question of whether I like the Party or not.... seekthetruth Jun 2016 #687
Things change. Cary Jun 2016 #695
Doesn't matter. Cranking down the ambient bile is all for the good... JHB Jun 2016 #178
Thats exactly right. If neither candidate has the requisite number of pledged delegates to bjo59 Jun 2016 #224
That's not how it works and that's never been how it works. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #494
It's clear to the person who owns the website. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #372
Yes, it will be. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #490
It is very clear now who will be the nominee of the Democratic party Gothmog Jun 2016 #582
Thanks! I'm looking forward to the new jury system ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6
Do you still think that I abused the jury system? PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #427
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #434
For your recollection. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #441
You make many assumptions... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #559
I told you I made an alert and your post was hidden. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #601
If what you say is true, then you've likely been eliminated from jury service because ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #612
I served on juries impartially and fairly. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #644
Obviously this is of great importance to you, but I feel compelled to let you know ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #650
Actually I do not miss jury duty. I have no case to make to Skinner. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #659
Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT. fleur-de-lisa Jun 2016 #617
Thank you. I see in this thread that others have been removed from jury pool PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #622
Very welcome clarification. A little good will and common courtesy will go a long way. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Jun 2016 #205
Oops!! Must mean "From NOW on...." 7962 Jun 2016 #262
Actually she meant Doctor_J Jun 2016 #379
A description of your candidate's increasingly trail-worn appearance is no proof of ill-will, Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #488
He would have had a shit fit if someone said that about Hillary. demmiblue Jun 2016 #568
Sounds fair. JimDandy Jun 2016 #8
Oh thank you so much bravenak Jun 2016 #9
HEY sis... yuiyoshida Jun 2016 #313
I moved across town and have had so much stuff to do bravenak Jun 2016 #373
Having fun, sis... yuiyoshida Jun 2016 #685
What criticism of Bernie Sanders will be permitted? (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #10
We don't want people to tear down Bernie Sanders either. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #21
Thank you. -none Jun 2016 #208
Thank you! klook Jun 2016 #376
I don't think Bernie Sanders Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #455
Since Bernie will endorse Hillary around that point, there won't be much incentive to attack him. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #647
Thanks for the clarity. LP2K12 Jun 2016 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #12
Advocating for him here would not be permitted. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #20
Of Course It Will billhicks76 Jun 2016 #540
We were referring to him as a third-party candidate hypothetically wyldwolf Jun 2016 #550
Semantics billhicks76 Jun 2016 #668
"advocating" as defined by the site owners. They won't argue semantics wyldwolf Jun 2016 #679
You Definitely Have An Attitude Problem billhicks76 Jun 2016 #700
Then he wouldn't be the DEm nom obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #134
So what? You can't advodate him on here obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #155
I'd think/hope that any advocacy of him in that case would be treated the same as... Tarc Jun 2016 #26
I agree advocating for Bernie would be advocating for someone other than the nominee Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #448
He's made clear that he's not going to do that. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #124
We don't permit people to support third-party spoilers. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #141
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #157
Not happening TeamPooka Jun 2016 #32
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #123
Did you not read Skinner's comments about civility? eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #158
Well, I believe that answers my question about what constitutes a "named removed" post. nt fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #327
Whoop, whoop, whoop, civility failure! Whoop, whoop.... FSogol Jun 2016 #191
I like Bernie. christx30 Jun 2016 #94
Very happy and excited about moving on. PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #16
GOTV people! The White House and Senate can be ours! Maybe even The HOR! nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #18
And don't forget Supreme Court appointments! Fla Dem Jun 2016 #37
SCOTUS for our POTUS! nt TeamPooka Jun 2016 #50
This would be so great if we could take back Congress Karma13612 Jun 2016 #42
I don't think anyone would disagree with you, Karma NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #271
+1000!! eom Karma13612 Jun 2016 #289
You and me both! nt fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #333
Fair enough. (eom) oasis Jun 2016 #19
What are the implications of groups like Socialist Progressives & the Populist Reform? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #22
You can't advocate for third parties anywhere on DU. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #34
Of course, but that is not the point of my question. I am talking about reform inside the party. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #55
Only my reading from above, if the critisicm is presented helpful way to help the nominee and still_one Jun 2016 #108
You are mistaken. The general election does not arrive until AFTER the convention. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #24
Well y'know, the Democratic Underground is not, in fact, a democracy Tarc Jun 2016 #40
The Democratic Underground Terms of Service state that we transition to the general election... Skinner Jun 2016 #45
Only if one of the candidates concedes. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #86
Yes, I want to stick with my rules. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #138
What if the FBI recommends that Hillary be indicted after the D.C. vote but before the convention Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #173
Obviously our policy would change if the nominee changes. Skinner Jun 2016 #181
Yes but how should we treat such articles or newscasts as they would no doubt have the effect Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #185
I'm sure you can figure out a way to do it... Skinner Jun 2016 #194
I know you have great expectations for Hillary and you don't believe she will be indicted, Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #206
I posted a reply to myself in error, so I'll post it again passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #276
fair enough passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #148
It's "his" site. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #385
The majority are more Clinton supporters or people who are able accept the reality Of this race. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #466
Well, as I posted above, according to the rules, the Democratic nominee will NOT be clear pdsimdars Jun 2016 #88
Wrong. The nominee will be clear when one of them concedes. nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #129
Please see comment #62 . . . those are the facts, as opposed to your opinions. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #196
Eggs and Chickens, Dude hootinholler Jun 2016 #226
Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot. MADem Jun 2016 #97
"Clinton will be nominated on the first ballot." Your exact statement explicitly says that there... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #136
She is the "presumptive nominee." She has been for some time now. MADem Jun 2016 #197
She is the "presumptive nominee." TimPlo Jun 2016 #425
Excuse me, but the phrase means the same thing it has meant for over a half century. MADem Jun 2016 #532
The AP will call her the presumptive nominee when she has the "magic number" pnwmom Jun 2016 #542
"Presumptive nominee" is nothing new. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #676
There has never been a nominee before a convention...by definition. You are not making news. tritsofme Jun 2016 #251
The nomination does not depend on pledged delegates alone. charlyvi Jun 2016 #150
Please see comment #62 . . . those are the facts, not your opinions. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #192
It's not my "opinion". It's how every election has gone since supers were introduced. charlyvi Jun 2016 #246
Did you even bother to read what THEY say about it? Not that we don't all think your opinion pdsimdars Jun 2016 #259
The Associated Press is going to call it for Hillary when she has the majority pnwmom Jun 2016 #543
Like they say, we can have our own opinions but not our own facts Read #62 pdsimdars Jun 2016 #265
blah, blah, blah, excuse, excuse, excuse. . . . . . make up your own little fantasy world, but pdsimdars Jun 2016 #605
fact puffy socks Jun 2016 #298
Just read what they have to say. I put it in post #62 pdsimdars Jun 2016 #261
It is unclear ... barrow-wight Jun 2016 #383
You're mistaken too. The nomination has never needed to be secured with pledged delegates alone. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #503
Well, that's not what the DNC has said about it. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #597
That IS in fact what the DNC has said about it. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #675
Do you read? pdsimdars Jun 2016 #680
An opinion piece is not "what the DNC says officially." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #684
June 15 will be like the movie The Purge Renew Deal Jun 2016 #25
DU posts will drop in half without the RW smears and sources. LonePirate Jun 2016 #27
I'm totally fine with that. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #48
They will pick back up. wildeyed Jun 2016 #210
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2016 #435
"Glorious." You keep using that word; I do not think it means what you think it means... petronius Jun 2016 #28
Criticism of Hillary Clinton will only be permitted OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #29
I think you should start a site called Helping The Public Underground. Demit Jun 2016 #100
If you think being anti-Dem for the GE is "helping the public" bettyellen Jun 2016 #116
That's right. This site is to help the Democratic nominee, and all Democrats win in the November still_one Jun 2016 #188
Change the name to Establishment Echo Chamber OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #199
Then why hang around? The TOS is clear and has been clear for years. MH1 Jun 2016 #386
Democratic National Convention, July 25-28, 2016 the nominee will be known Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #300
Yeah, change the name to "establishment echo chamber" from BS echo chamber.. lol Cha Jun 2016 #497
KICK & REC!!! still_one Jun 2016 #499
well take comfort azurnoir Jun 2016 #228
That is straight forward. This site will serve to promote her. "Presumptive glinda Jun 2016 #504
Should Sanders manage the biggest comeback of all time and win the nomination the same rules apply. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #505
Then the problem isn't this site, OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #553
I hope that the "right-wing source" rule will be enforced Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #30
It will be enforced. Skinner Jun 2016 #51
Awesome! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #57
Thank you Skinner. riversedge Jun 2016 #233
Excellent! Thanks Skinner n/t NastyRiffraff Jun 2016 #273
that's great Skinner. OKNancy Jun 2016 #280
What if the source is critisizing Trump. I've seen red state have anti Trump articles. DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #365
I totally agree. n/t demmiblue Jun 2016 #59
It's not logical to lump together all right-wing sources. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #67
It is if you've been monitoring them for 20 years... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #89
IMHO there is no scenario where WND needs to be a source Renew Deal Jun 2016 #92
Do you oppose quoting WND in the specific circumstance I mentioned? If so, why? (n/t) Jim Lane Jun 2016 #110
Look for other sources... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #120
It's not my call but i don't have an issue with true mockery of exposure. Renew Deal Jun 2016 #121
I would say if it is a news story from the WSJ ,it really should be fine. However, if it is an still_one Jun 2016 #213
I'd be more permissive than that. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #240
I feel sorry for people who think the WSJ is "right wing" 7962 Jun 2016 #269
The editorial/opinion page is for the most part right wing. emulatorloo Jun 2016 #631
Precisely. And we couldnt link editorials on LBN anyway. 7962 Jun 2016 #651
Are you aware of who owns the WSJ? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #639
The news reporting is not the same as the op-ed page. 7962 Jun 2016 #653
DUers routinely use the WSJ op-ed page as a source. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #665
Thats why I dont post opinion pieces. I can write my own opinion! 7962 Jun 2016 #677
Agree Renew Deal Jun 2016 #85
As soon as I see those URL's, I will go looking for a more mainstream source... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #115
global research. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #238
Infowars Renew Deal Jun 2016 #243
I missed that one. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #248
Yeah, using those as sources used to get you half-way to a tombstone Maeve Jun 2016 #255
And they're still terrible sources. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #258
OMG, I'm so with you on that one!!! Amimnoch Jun 2016 #133
Could we have a list of unacceptable sources? femmocrat Jun 2016 #135
It would be helpful, but just googling them will show their slant... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #177
Not to mention Breitbart News! Breitbart! eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #169
Yep! One of the worst of the worst! Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #183
100% Agree LP2K12 Jun 2016 #236
sounds fair to me. zappaman Jun 2016 #33
Would that extend to more local politics. Bad Dog Jun 2016 #35
This announcement is about the presidential. Skinner Jun 2016 #56
There will be an exception for those races with no Democrat running, correct? MohRokTah Jun 2016 #229
Will there any special cases? Bad Dog Jun 2016 #533
100% for the Democratic Nominee and Party. 100% against the Republican Nominee and Party. onehandle Jun 2016 #36
I really do hope that you come down hard on The Yellow Button Brigade. demmiblue Jun 2016 #39
We are going to insist that people follow our rules. Skinner Jun 2016 #75
Yes it was a slap in the face and changed my attitude about this forum. Purveyor Jun 2016 #142
Godspeed. Mosby Jun 2016 #252
That post is as appropriate today as it was the day I posted it. eom Purveyor Jun 2016 #331
I can live with this however I have a question about down jwirr Jun 2016 #43
Why not? joshcryer Jun 2016 #58
That is what I do. I did it last election season, and I am still here. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2016 #70
as long as they are dems, why not? larkrake Jun 2016 #77
As long as they are running in Democratic primaries: Go for it. Skinner Jun 2016 #78
Good stuff. joshcryer Jun 2016 #46
Thank you for your announcement and the promise of more guidelines. I do have a couple of questions. FourScore Jun 2016 #47
The primaries end on DU when the voting is done... Skinner Jun 2016 #81
But some of the Hillary supporters still REALLY believe she will be the nominee, FourScore Jun 2016 #125
Thanks Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 #49
Tks Skinner. Hoping for the best of DU. 7wo7rees Jun 2016 #52
I appreciate your clarification passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #53
Everyone knows who the nominee is going to be. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #84
No they don't. pdsimdars Jun 2016 #102
Patience, Grasshopper. n/t FourScore Jun 2016 #140
I posted the how the Democratic party makes the decision in post #62. And it won't happen pdsimdars Jun 2016 #202
It is also a FACT that in every election since 1984, that the winner has been called pnwmom Jun 2016 #314
Yes, they do. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #399
Schmooze Much? billhicks76 Jun 2016 #544
Even if he wins every remaining contest, barrow-wight Jun 2016 #547
Hillary Should Of Course Offer Bernie The VP Slot billhicks76 Jun 2016 #555
I don't hate that idea. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #556
Omg! Go to another site if you can't deal with the rules. Isn't there some Sanders site? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #457
I'm just saying. . . if you want to keep this site firmly rooted in the REAL WORLD, you might pdsimdars Jun 2016 #599
No. The majority of your revenue-generating membership on DU disagrees with your... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #162
The rules were stated very clearly when general election mode goes into effect. June 16th. Lets still_one Jun 2016 #250
That's not "how it works" here. Bobbie Jo Jun 2016 #260
There is the AP tracker that shows Hillary only needs 71 pledged delegates pnwmom Jun 2016 #317
Please stop arguing with the owner of this site. So disrespectful. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #461
Uuummmmm...no. Just because he is the owner, that doesn't make him immune to... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #615
There are a lot of Bernie supporters who still believe he will be the nominee. totodeinhere Jun 2016 #460
Huh??? Not everyone "knows" that (including me)! n/t baran Jun 2016 #493
No they don't. You said so yourself, with this: bvf Jun 2016 #525
I, for one, can't wait until this primary is over... MrScorpio Jun 2016 #54
And you gave no indication as to what happens to the website if Bernie wins the contested convention retrowire Jun 2016 #60
Actually you're wrong. We know exactly what would happen. Skinner Jun 2016 #90
I would hope it's that simple. retrowire Jun 2016 #122
It is not arrogant for me to say I know what the DU policy would be under that circumstance. Skinner Jun 2016 #131
My comment about the arrogance was about anyone knowing the outcome retrowire Jun 2016 #144
My two cents. The TOS is stating the convention is just a formality because after the still_one Jun 2016 #270
There won't be a contested convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #529
OK, but... SandersDem Jun 2016 #61
Hillary Clinton is almost certain to be the nominee. Skinner Jun 2016 #95
Thank you SandersDem Jun 2016 #109
I think what many on this thread are pointing out LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #329
Are you "almost certain" that you will survive till dinner time or is it definite? Renew Deal Jun 2016 #589
I never took it to a life and death question LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #692
So it's just going to be an all in for Hillary from June 16 until Bernie clinches the nomination in Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #406
You are tired of people bashing each other. Curmudgeoness Jun 2016 #63
+1 demmiblue Jun 2016 #66
That horse has left the barn. Skinner Jun 2016 #99
Who opened the barn door? bvf Jun 2016 #546
Yes, I did. And I am responsible. Skinner Jun 2016 #558
Yes please, that was a huge mistake Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #174
Why? Because the jury hunters lost their effectiveness? onehandle Jun 2016 #279
No because a lot of people with 10 plus hides Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #380
Thank you Skinner redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #64
Works for me Warpy Jun 2016 #65
Woohooo! Agschmid Jun 2016 #68
This will not end well without a purge. AngryAmish Jun 2016 #69
Not needed. Once Hillary get's protected status we have plenty of other sites to choose from. harun Jun 2016 #634
I've posted before that I didn't believe in any so-called "purge." cwydro Jun 2016 #71
No bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election ! Her Sister Jun 2016 #72
Well stat3d laserhaas Jun 2016 #74
Just Want to Say That On the Road Jun 2016 #79
You are very kind. Skinner Jun 2016 #106
Don't know how you do it..... kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #468
I appreciate learning the historical facts of all political leaders, including the bad and the ugly. lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #80
You will probably be disappointed then because "historical" postings pnwmom Jun 2016 #319
The way I read it, they will be if the posts stick to the facts lindysalsagal Jun 2016 #442
No -- and I've been here through other campaigns. You will learn otherwise. pnwmom Jun 2016 #478
No, they won't, sorry obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #619
Thanks so much. Cannot wait till communit standards mean something again! bettyellen Jun 2016 #83
Thank you Skinner. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #87
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #91
Good post. Very reasonable. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #93
It's great to hear this will all be over soon. Chemisse Jun 2016 #98
Good work, Skinner. It I a appreciated. floriduck Jun 2016 #101
So I guess we will not be allowed Cryptoad Jun 2016 #103
No, it won't. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #112
OK,,,,,, I'll be glad to see DU get back to its old standards.....nt Cryptoad Jun 2016 #126
...says the person with (at least) TEN recent hides. Please find a mirror and re-read Skinner's FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #330
But we can be thrilled as F about HRC clinching it without fear of nasty attacks! bettyellen Jun 2016 #156
*Points at Cryptoad and looks at Skinner* retrowire Jun 2016 #128
Like skinnner said,,,,,, Cryptoad Jun 2016 #149
Just stop making comments like we Bernie supporters deserve our noses put in dog shit retrowire Jun 2016 #153
u seem to have tunnel vision..... Cryptoad Jun 2016 #170
*facepalm* nt retrowire Jun 2016 #171
Why say it at all? I mean really. JEB Jun 2016 #337
Is it really that hard not to be a jerk? Marrah_G Jun 2016 #179
breath deep,,,, let all come out,,,,,,,,! Cryptoad Jun 2016 #182
Whichever candidate you support, I assure you that you can find many jerks among your allies. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #215
Agreed Marrah_G Jun 2016 #216
Not often is there a post where I can say SCantiGOP Jun 2016 #104
Thanks. HuckleB Jun 2016 #113
K&R PatSeg Jun 2016 #114
Aww. You're no fun pscot Jun 2016 #119
Clear enough and sounds fair. Duval Jun 2016 #127
The Convention occurs in July. The Nominee is not chosen until the Convention actually votes. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #130
Issues are different than attacking our candidate, or other DUers..... bettyellen Jun 2016 #163
Evidently you don't read my posts. You assume animosity where none exists. Ford_Prefect Jun 2016 #264
"Some of us" are on a pretty high horse and if they continue to denigrate others here.... bettyellen Jun 2016 #285
Thanks, I cannot wait ghostsinthemachine Jun 2016 #132
Thanks, Skinner PJMcK Jun 2016 #139
Sounds good to me. Thank you. yardwork Jun 2016 #143
So will neo-Nazi websites still be valid? angrychair Jun 2016 #151
neo-Nazi websites will not be permitted. (nt) Skinner Jun 2016 #154
Thanks, Skinner. The 16th can't come quickly enough! greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #152
I think most of the Hillary Bernie bashing has been done by GOP rent a trolls who joined in the last Monk06 Jun 2016 #160
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #161
This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Jun 2016 #165
This message was self-deleted by its author Gomez163 Jun 2016 #166
Lol Skinner Jun 2016 #167
I'm feeling a lot better about this place. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #172
This message was self-deleted by its author retrowire Jun 2016 #184
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #201
he doesn't "require" voting for anyone specifically charlyvi Jun 2016 #217
Read it your self SusanLarson Jun 2016 #230
You have to be smarter than that charlyvi Jun 2016 #268
"must support". Did not say "Must vote for.." 7962 Jun 2016 #283
If you want to associate with this website, that is Skinner's requirement. But pnwmom Jun 2016 #304
I think we should encourage the poster to go the FBI still_one Jun 2016 #408
Only if I can be there to see the look on the faces of the FBI agents who have to respond mythology Jun 2016 #447
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHahahahah! barrow-wight Jun 2016 #412
.. Cha Jun 2016 #604
This message was self-deleted by its author steve2470 Jun 2016 #628
You are being silly Marrah_G Jun 2016 #221
This message was self-deleted by its author Amimnoch Jun 2016 #257
Under the constitution we all have a right to Freedom of Association and Skinner pnwmom Jun 2016 #303
SOP/ TOS sheshe2 Jun 2016 #338
Hell to the yeah! JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #343
Some posters are just dying to proclaim: "Armen Tamzarian's reign of terror is over!!" (eom) StevieM Jun 2016 #354
Some have their own "special" rules I guess. I'll throw in a donation to DU on that post just for still_one Jun 2016 #397
"If get banned for who I support or will not support I personally will file a complaint with the Cha Jun 2016 #531
This is a private site, you have no "rights" here Marrah_G Jun 2016 #175
Gee, now I hope you don't get banned. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #186
I hope it will not be necessary SusanLarson Jun 2016 #218
No one is holding a "banning" over your head. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #263
I'll be waiting for the indictment! LOL charlyvi Jun 2016 #272
I wonder if Skinner ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #290
ROFL OKNancy Jun 2016 #307
I'll start a GoFundMe for his bail and legal fees. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #325
BaJeysus. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #342
Oooooohhh!! bravenak Jun 2016 #370
ROFL! "Disgruntled Member Brings DU to it's Knees - Seeks One Million 'RECs' in Compensation!" Cha Jun 2016 #472
Hey Susan... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #320
I think she should be encouraged to go to the FBI on this one. still_one Jun 2016 #410
Skinner's rules are for the DU forum, not for the voting booth. You can, of course, vote for whom uppityperson Jun 2016 #332
"I hope it will not be necessary" barrow-wight Jun 2016 #416
Lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #419
Ooooh! The FBI! missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #211
If it happens we will see. SusanLarson Jun 2016 #227
I am an attorney. missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #234
I really think she should be encouraged to go to the FBI on this still_one Jun 2016 #413
I know, right? missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #426
me too, because it was classic still_one Jun 2016 #440
I bookmarked that comic gem rbrnmw Jun 2016 #479
if for nothing else, these are gems. Thanks still_one Jun 2016 #482
Hmmm. I wonder if anyone has heard from diabeticman lately. . . . missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #649
Freedom of association is a constitutional right.... Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #281
This site is about supporting Democrats. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #367
I so would like to see the FBI's response to your complaint. cwydro Jun 2016 #577
SKINNER HAS BEEN INDICTED FOR COERCING PEOPLE INTO FOLLOWING THE RULES OF HIS WEBSITE. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #311
CALL CONGRESS RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! uppityperson Jun 2016 #326
KICK & REC!!!!!!!!! still_one Jun 2016 #415
WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!11!!!2 NobodyHere Jun 2016 #673
Wow, that was quick still_one Jun 2016 #414
Um, that US code does not apply to the rules of this site. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #247
Not long before your grave dancing gifs have to go. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #355
If my gifs have to go, your bug gifs have to go. eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #359
My bug gif isn't grave dancing (for months) in celebration of losing a long-time DUer. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #384
Your bug gif celebrates a long time disruptor banned for violations of TOS MohRokTah Jun 2016 #387
Nope. but thanks for playing. nt Gore1FL Jun 2016 #388
We;ll see how Skinner lets it play out. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #398
I'm pretty sure he won't allow grave dancing. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #407
I'm pretty sure he won't allow Troll celebrating MohRokTah Jun 2016 #409
Not celebrating a troll. Countering Grave dancing. Gore1FL Jun 2016 #454
The troll celebrating started after the troll was banned. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #462
If you supported the admins, you wouldn't actively try to make DU suck Gore1FL Jun 2016 #467
i dance on no graves. I swat the flies of troll celebrators. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #476
Good grief. Cary Jun 2016 #249
Overheated melodrama. Weak grasp of law, history or reality. Let me guess.... Sanders supporter? Number23 Jun 2016 #287
'bye, Walt. n/t winter is coming Jun 2016 #293
LOL, good one. nt MH1 Jun 2016 #401
LOL - I've been here since 2001 and I don't think I've ever read anything so hilarious OKNancy Jun 2016 #301
This is either hilarious deadpan Walt-Starr-evoking humor, or quite simply nuts. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #310
Thanks for the update RockaFowler Jun 2016 #164
My suggestion to those who do not support the nominee is this: Marrah_G Jun 2016 #168
I hope that "support" means, essentially, "not oppose" Jim Lane Jun 2016 #176
You're alright, Skinner ejbr Jun 2016 #180
Thanks again, Skinner! Maeve Jun 2016 #187
Hmmm..... Fine. desmiller Jun 2016 #189
OK Dad, we will try to do better and stop bickering like three year olds. wildeyed Jun 2016 #190
If people here want to vote for Jill Stein, then say hello to President Trump NYCButterfinger Jun 2016 #193
That depends on how many vote for Gary Johnson. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #431
DU is a great site. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #195
Personally, I can live with most of that. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #203
If whoever wins is not the person I want, I'll remove myself from that election. PatrynXX Jun 2016 #204
But... the primary ends at the Convention... modestybl Jun 2016 #207
Thanks for the update and keep up the good work. FSogol Jun 2016 #209
DU without standards lost the very unique qualities that make it worthwhile. Bluenorthwest Jun 2016 #212
It would be wiser to wait until the July 25 convention chooses nominee. /nt philly_bob Jun 2016 #219
I welcome the end of the Fight Club silliness herding cats Jun 2016 #222
First, thank you for the return of courtesy as a community standard. IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #223
Up thread Skinner already said no how, no where. bettyellen Jun 2016 #492
Any post about a candidate (and if only positive) goes out into cyberspace. glinda Jun 2016 #513
It will be interesting to see if this site can be the haven that it was after "W"'s election... Walk away Jun 2016 #225
Acknowledged. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #231
Sounds good. MineralMan Jun 2016 #232
Incidentally, Dr Strange keeps leaving the toilet seat up. Orrex Jun 2016 #235
What if you want to help Bernie and not Clinton to succeed in winning the nomination? imagine2015 Jun 2016 #237
Skinner thanks for being so fair, I am hard-core Bernie supporter but your rules make sense n/t davidlynch Jun 2016 #239
focus on Trump. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #241
Goodbye Democratic Underground McKim Jun 2016 #242
Later! wysi Jun 2016 #358
And your observation of Trump is that he's a hippie peace freak MH1 Jun 2016 #404
You won't have to worry Reter Jun 2016 #418
get ready to be shocked AntiBank Jun 2016 #578
that you for the cool head..... chillfactor Jun 2016 #245
I look foward to the day the vitriol here ends. I know i had my part in making DU suck and i hope DU hrmjustin Jun 2016 #253
Glad there will be no purges. zentrum Jun 2016 #266
I promise... ReRe Jun 2016 #267
I am looking forward to June 16 Gothmog Jun 2016 #274
Good stuff, and right at the heart of what has become a patisanship emphesis on bashing .... marble falls Jun 2016 #275
Thanks, Skinner and DU Admins tandot Jun 2016 #277
Thank you, Skinner. Very much appreciated. ((nt) Paladin Jun 2016 #278
My only concern is biased juries liberal N proud Jun 2016 #282
I know it'll all be ok annabanana Jun 2016 #284
Thanks for putting up with us! complain jane Jun 2016 #291
In a year when there is bound to be questions up until the convention, why would you start this... Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #295
YAY! Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #297
I feel that way, too. It's difficult. Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #422
It doesn't really matter if the nominee "isn't clear" by the 16th... JHB Jun 2016 #299
Can I get unbanned from the Hillary group? I will support the nominee. ALBliberal Jun 2016 #302
You need to reach out directly to the person who blocked you JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #349
I guess I will reach out again ALBliberal Jun 2016 #382
Why? JTFrog Jun 2016 #508
I was banned unfairly with a waving.smiley face. That's not a jab. That ALBliberal Jun 2016 #607
You were banned for your disparaging remarks. JTFrog Jun 2016 #686
Oh and who spent hours lined up here in Albuquerque to get her signature ALBliberal Jun 2016 #698
This message was self-deleted by its author MerryBlooms Jun 2016 #305
This might clear up the mystery. pnwmom Jun 2016 #340
This message was self-deleted by its author MerryBlooms Jun 2016 #345
The problem here is I lost jury duty and was no where near guilty of what was described. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #438
If you've actually been removed from the jury pool ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #566
On April 27 we exchanged two PMs. PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #595
Yes ... I am all powerful. :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #598
Evidenly so. I'm done. eom PufPuf23 Jun 2016 #602
I think that's a smart decision ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #606
I continue to think the place needs fumigation. I hear TrollAway works wonders. Stinky The Clown Jun 2016 #306
Nice post Adolph. I'm alerting this! progressoid Jun 2016 #309
OK guys. TBF Jun 2016 #312
Thank you and question tammywammy Jun 2016 #318
Based on this thread, it has never been more apparent... wyldwolf Jun 2016 #321
Nail. ----> Head. AwakeAtLast Jun 2016 #391
^^^This!^^^ Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #512
Thanks for laying it Wibly Jun 2016 #323
I think we should wait until something is official at the convention mvd Jun 2016 #395
You're a good soul, Skinner. Thanks and best of luck. Hekate Jun 2016 #334
Heh! flying rabbit Jun 2016 #335
My favorite post is #82. rug Jun 2016 #339
You sre a good man, Skinner libodem Jun 2016 #341
What about Pro-Sanders avatars and sig lines? They will still be permitted right? liberalnarb Jun 2016 #344
For some reason I think they will be gone as well as the Bernie Group? If that is how the die falls. glinda Jun 2016 #519
My expectation is that it will get truebluegreen Jun 2016 #347
^^That^^ onecaliberal Jun 2016 #421
Well spoken, Skinner. Adsos Letter Jun 2016 #348
This is excellent but you didn't address the real problem postatomic Jun 2016 #353
As one who has been here almost since the beginning Loki Jun 2016 #356
But what if.... Doctor Jack Jun 2016 #361
Cool. Hey can you tell me why my profile page says the Hillary Clinton Group is my favorite? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #362
Uh, your profile page shows that UtahLib Jun 2016 #437
Here are your posts in the Hillary Group tammywammy Jun 2016 #465
K&R... spanone Jun 2016 #363
Thank you Skinner! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #364
I'm in MFM008 Jun 2016 #371
I am looking forward to this. It's the way it should have been all along. stevenleser Jun 2016 #389
Thanks for the update Dem2 Jun 2016 #393
Thanks for the clarification and for letting us use your forum. uppityperson Jun 2016 #394
The divisions are deep and fundamental zeemike Jun 2016 #396
Will advocating that super-delegates vote for Bernie be allowed? jg10003 Jun 2016 #400
I think it's clear from the above announcement that it is not. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #471
advertising glinda Jun 2016 #520
I don't recall anyone caring about any of them since Nader. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #526
This is the Democratic Party. A little something called democracy also matters. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #528
Skinner: If Hillary Clinton has trouble with the law i.e., investigation, FBI, DOJ and she is bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #402
okay, so I have one week left to bash people here. Bucky Jun 2016 #403
I would hope so. rug Jun 2016 #420
Generally speaking, I think the terms of service are not well understood... CBHagman Jun 2016 #417
Agreed. Or "the other post is worse so I'm not hiding this one" which just leads to the escalation seaglass Jun 2016 #562
Its like herding cattle. Go Vols Jun 2016 #428
This sounds very reasonable to me. k&r DesertRat Jun 2016 #432
Thank you for the time... deathrind Jun 2016 #433
cool blogslut Jun 2016 #436
Thank you, Skinner! R&K nt longship Jun 2016 #444
Thanks Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #446
Thanks for spelling it all out! ucrdem Jun 2016 #451
My prediction.... Gary Johnson and Jill Stein alittlelark Jun 2016 #452
Well Jill Stein should not be discussed in the GE Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #459
As I read it, advocacy for Stein is barred but that doesn't mean she can't be discussed. Jim Lane Jun 2016 #473
Advocated for here... no. mwooldri Jun 2016 #474
I agree nt Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #489
Your fatal flaw like most anti Hillary people here is that you think your opinion is matched by a upaloopa Jun 2016 #486
Not going to happen. Johnson got 1% in 2012, Stein got a total of 450k votes TwilightZone Jun 2016 #630
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #458
This is very disappointing, I feel that you are trying to direct the discussion in favor of Hilary. DrewFlorida Jun 2016 #463
How is it possible for Bernie to win? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #470
pretty much the only way he can is for the FBI to recommend an indictment before the convention AntiBank Jun 2016 #585
Nope, Skinner and DU always try to direct discussion in favor of the Democratic nominee. stevenleser Jun 2016 #584
Sounds good ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #469
Very Reasonable Oixi1993 Jun 2016 #475
hi newbie! glinda Jun 2016 #524
That leads to a question. RandySF Jun 2016 #477
I'm looking forward to general election on DU. bobGandolf Jun 2016 #480
Looking forward to seeing how this works out on DU goldent Jun 2016 #481
Thank you, Skinner, I'm rooting for a better and stronger DU. eom UtahLib Jun 2016 #484
I'm calling Congress and the FBI RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!111!! zappaman Jun 2016 #506
Like I've said in responce to every other thread that has announced Clinton prematurely Lordquinton Jun 2016 #510
Excellent proud patriot Jun 2016 #515
Great! Now we can all get down to the real business of totally trouncing Trump. In_The_Wind Jun 2016 #554
Why Not Wait Until The Convention When It Is Finally Decided? I'm an Old Fart Land of Enchantment Jun 2016 #560
It'll definitely be interesting Dorian Gray Jun 2016 #561
June 16 is too soon. GE mode should be for when we have a nominee - which will be in July. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #563
The AP will call the election by June 7, when Hillary wins the majority pnwmom Jun 2016 #565
superdelegates will not be committed until July. If the AP wants to presume a lot, Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #623
Superdelegates are committed whenever they decide that they're committed. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #662
The AP doesn't "lean" any way. They'll be following their STANDARD procedure. pnwmom Jun 2016 #664
Maybe I will come by more often. JNelson6563 Jun 2016 #567
And that would be a GOOD thing! Maeve Jun 2016 #573
Hi Maeve! JNelson6563 Jun 2016 #710
Guidance on prohibited "meta-discussions" anyone? Not sure I understand. n/t MrModerate Jun 2016 #570
Meta-discussions are those about the board Maeve Jun 2016 #572
Ah, I was afraid it was a prohibition against . . . MrModerate Jun 2016 #709
i hope everyone reads and takes this to heart. barbtries Jun 2016 #574
Sounds about right... The_Commonist Jun 2016 #579
So, at what point can Bernie supporters tell Hillary supporters, 'told you so'? Dawgs Jun 2016 #580
But I really, really, REALLY wanna purge! MoonRiver Jun 2016 #581
All I ask is that the targeting of black DUers end. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2016 #587
YES. betsuni Jun 2016 #592
Yup, Hillary supporters in General, black DUers in particular. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #642
So if it's "support Hillary or else" here at DU nyabingi Jun 2016 #600
"unfortunate enough for her to become president" Maven Jun 2016 #620
I'd be happy to explain nyabingi Jun 2016 #707
"if we're unfortunate enough for her to become president" obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #621
It would be unfortunate for either to be president nyabingi Jun 2016 #706
Yeah, that isn't what that statement means obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #708
You sound like a Trump supporter Democat Jun 2016 #637
I put Hillary and Donald on about the same level nyabingi Jun 2016 #705
wise choice considering the other responses stupidicus Jun 2016 #643
Message Received lpbk2713 Jun 2016 #616
I hope you are going to do something about the repeat offenders you keep allowing back Rex Jun 2016 #633
Do we have any more flexibility in what we can say within the Bernie Group? JudyM Jun 2016 #635
Point Taken colsohlibgal Jun 2016 #636
Looking forward to the changes. LynneSin Jun 2016 #638
Perhaps you can add an appropriate check box to the alert? The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #640
That's actually a really good idea! obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #646
We are completely changing the way we run the site. Skinner Jun 2016 #656
Thanks The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #693
So sad to see the Freepers go. ffr Jun 2016 #652
You mean people who want universal healthcare, less war, no torture, no capital punishment, Doctor_J Jun 2016 #689
I'm ok with Hillary and I will vote for her. DocMac Jun 2016 #658
Glad to see this happening, Skinner. hamsterjill Jun 2016 #660
thank you and I love you! renate Jun 2016 #661
Why is there no paragraph about what criticism will and will not be allowed for Bernie? cui bono Jun 2016 #670
Interesting. H2O Man Jun 2016 #672
The tos say that we're allowed to be liberal. That will conflict starkly with Mrs Clinton's views Doctor_J Jun 2016 #690
I'm complete down with and looking forward to the transition SaschaHM Jun 2016 #691
So when Clinton loses the General Election RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #694
Skinner, please see my OP, "What about an "anyone but Clinton or Sanders" scenario? Peace Patriot Jun 2016 #703
Congratulations, I think this beat even Kudzu uppityperson Jun 2016 #711
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2017 #713
Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Announcements»About the upcoming transi...»Reply #0