Announcements

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

113. She did not bully

Wed Sep 25, 2013, 01:56 PM

Sep 2013

What she did not understand was why I really had no intention of saying hi. She remembered HS as if we were the best of pals, which we were not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

407 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We are making some changes to the moderating/jury system. (THIS IS IMPORTANT.) [View all] Skinner Sep 2013 OP

thanks for all your hard work Voice for Peace Sep 2013 #1

+1 Scuba Sep 2013 #100

+1 Plucketeer Sep 2013 #268

+1 Duval Sep 2013 #390

Looks like the best addition to DU3 since it's creation. Rex Sep 2013 #2

Thanks for these changes. They look like they'll help a lot... CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #3

Great. More rules. Dawgs Sep 2013 #4

What "rules?" This is community moderation--it's a good thing. MADem Sep 2013 #191

Thanks for the info! Brigid Sep 2013 #5

This looks great, but... cynatnite Sep 2013 #6

No shit. Dawgs Sep 2013 #13

5 in 90 days -- that seems generous to me! karynnj Sep 2013 #72

Particularly in post-Meta DU, that seems REALLY generous. stevenleser Sep 2013 #91

Or you've been singled out for bullying. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #154

If you're "singled out" by five randomly-selected juries the problem's probably in the mirror. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #186

So it's the victim's fault? It isnt the juries that send the alerts. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #197

If that many juries agree? Then of course it's the "victim's" fault. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #203

I disagree. It's never the fault of a victim of bullying. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #213

I agree. I've only had one hidden and it was the most childish thing to do it. 7962 Sep 2013 #249

I believe most jury decisions are honest and fair. But I have been on the receiving end rhett o rick Sep 2013 #252

Agreed, somewhat. I made the mistake nightscanner59 Sep 2013 #279

I don't have any problem with "leaving" a post when I feel the alert is bogus. winter is coming Sep 2013 #205

Yes, but if enough alerts are made on a person, it only takes 5 bogus to shut them up. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #218

Really? Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #226

Of course. I dont approve in ANY case. I just picked an example. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #240

I do understand Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #243

Good. I am not the best with getting my point across. I may fight with others rhett o rick Sep 2013 #246

I am honored to be a host along with you Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #257

And I you. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #281

If singled out by say "a special group" and alerted on as a matter of being targeted Dragonfli Sep 2013 #261

I have seen the "Group" single out posters and attack. Many have not reacted rhett o rick Sep 2013 #276

What Clique of DU Bullies On the Road Oct 2013 #396

How many alerts do you think Manny or Pro get in a 90 day period? nm rhett o rick Oct 2013 #397

So You are Saying That Even Though Any Individual Jury is Random, On the Road Oct 2013 #398

or you are saying something wildly unpopular here, and only here pasto76 Sep 2013 #266

This has been the case with me. That's why I had left. But these new rules convinced me BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #395

He is saying that you only get hidden if you are guilty. Those that get hidden deserve it. rhett o rick Oct 2013 #399

Absolutely. There are a few things that are certain to get a post banned BlueStreak Sep 2013 #256

I got one (my first ever) and it shocked me. I've been walking (posting) on coals since. tofuandbeer Sep 2013 #278

I am sure my reaction would be as you describe karynnj Sep 2013 #311

I just went and looked at my transparency page, because, well, hit the right nerve tavalon Sep 2013 #326

I shouldn't have been too surprised... tofuandbeer Sep 2013 #347

My issue here is.. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #348

I've never had one AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #298

Sounds good. SheilaT Sep 2013 #7

This sounds very reasonable. reflection Sep 2013 #8

Me too. I don't think this is what is meant (at least I hope not. I like serving on the juries!) anneboleyn Sep 2013 #117

I believe it tavalon Sep 2013 #327

I have complete faith that you are doing what you think is best for the site. Laelth Sep 2013 #9

i like the 5 deleted posts rule. La Lioness Priyanka Sep 2013 #10

Looks good. grantcart Sep 2013 #11

Thank you ! n/t SoCalDem Sep 2013 #12

let me make sure I am clear.... irisblue Sep 2013 #14

A review does not mean that anything is wrong. Curmudgeoness Sep 2013 #229

I just noticed the missing TOS box, just before your announcement. MineralMan Sep 2013 #15

Fair approach...thanks. n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #16

Fantastic changes! I think these will go a long way morningfog Sep 2013 #17

Well done, Skinner. Aristus Sep 2013 #18

How is this possible? I agree with everything! stevenleser Sep 2013 #19

+1 SunSeeker Sep 2013 #26

That, coupled with every alert going to admin should head off bad-faith alerters. nt msanthrope Sep 2013 #38

Maybe, maybe not. Myrina Sep 2013 #41

There is always appeal to the admins. I think if someone gets their posting privls suspended and stevenleser Sep 2013 #52

While they didn't say that, tavalon Sep 2013 #328

I don't think it's based on alerts, just hidden posts... Wounded Bear Sep 2013 #68

Collusion of the jurists is easy Pab Sungenis Sep 2013 #121

That seems like a lot of effort cyberswede Sep 2013 #157

No. Agschmid Sep 2013 #169

I was just going to write almost word for word what you said. tavalon Sep 2013 #330

The admins would see a pattern, I think. They might be able to get away with it once. nt MADem Sep 2013 #254

10 friends compared to how many are surfing DU at a given time? Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #394

Occasionally you get bad jury decisions. If enough alerts are thrown against the DU wall rhett o rick Sep 2013 #247

Well, that's also assuming pipi_k Sep 2013 #106

Alerts don't cause suspension of posting privileges. tblue37 Sep 2013 #235

I don't think the admins are dull of comprehension.... MADem Sep 2013 #244

I've only met two of them and the other is the actual programmer, so, tavalon Sep 2013 #333

Heh heh....I cannot take credit. MADem Sep 2013 #337

It's great and it's very old fashioned but I think that's why I like it. tavalon Sep 2013 #344

Only if juries consistently hide personal attacks Gormy Cuss Sep 2013 #94

True. I wish personal attacks were hidden more often. It's a real simple idea. Don't attack DUers... stevenleser Sep 2013 #101

Funny, there was a thread that turned into a Nance Greggs bashing committee tavalon Sep 2013 #334

Generally, personal attacks on "Gungeoneers" are a free pass. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #171

Or a dedicated cabal of alert-bombers Pab Sungenis Sep 2013 #119

Good idea. nt Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #141

I agree. Alerters should pay a price for malicious alerts or alerts for non-aler table issues. bluestate10 Sep 2013 #176

+This. dkf Sep 2013 #269

I had the same "problem" - I *love* it. IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #123

Ta. dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #20

Should make Mirt more interesting for us. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #21

Tell Otto goodbye for me. uppityperson Sep 2013 #42

I love OTTO! I hope this means he is not leaving us because he is needed for you know who. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #45

Ah, so only the 6-0? That is good. uppityperson Sep 2013 #53

From what I am reading now in Mirt OTTo is not going anywhere. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #57

That is good. uppityperson Sep 2013 #71

Yes a new hobby indeed. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #79

+1, I agree uppityperson Sep 2013 #90

I don't think there's anything in the OP that changes Otto's relationship with MIRT Lasher Sep 2013 #180

The only thing that changes is we have to manually ban people who just sign up and get a hidden hrmjustin Sep 2013 #181

OK I think I know what you mean. Lasher Sep 2013 #187

There is a thread in Mirt about it. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #189

Thanks. Lasher Sep 2013 #192

We're going to continue getting noobs' hidden posts Turborama Sep 2013 #80

Thanks. My curiosity is a cats sometimes uppityperson Sep 2013 #89

No probs! Turborama Sep 2013 #362

Looks good. rrneck Sep 2013 #22

Constructive tweaks...thanks Skinner! Old and In the Way Sep 2013 #23

For each 6-0 against you, you lose privileges for a day stevenleser Sep 2013 #29

It's alerting privileges. It's happened to me. winter is coming Sep 2013 #211

People are already penalized for alerting and being shot down 6-0. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #31

That sounds reasonable. Old and In the Way Sep 2013 #56

I agree. A group of Alerters abuse the jury system... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #108

Yes. I have definitely noticed this while serving on juries. Some use it to "shame" anneboleyn Sep 2013 #124

But some of the alerts are spam - truedelphi Sep 2013 #164

Spam alerts are the quickest ones to jury, IMO. I don't mind getting those. winter is coming Sep 2013 #214

Thank you very much for the needed "code" - truedelphi Sep 2013 #353

Excellent! and a question... hootinholler Sep 2013 #24

works for me . . . n/t annabanana Sep 2013 #25

Awesome! LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #27

Much needed changes...especially addressing the small group that "hidden posts" does not influence.. hlthe2b Sep 2013 #28

I can think of two people in particular who are going to stevenleser Sep 2013 #34

Yeah, there are a few with hidden posts on the upper teens! morningfog Sep 2013 #44

Skinner, EarlG, Elad... LadyHawkAZ Sep 2013 #30

Of course this will not stop anyone who votes to hide on the basis of them not liking someone. L0oniX Sep 2013 #32

I agree PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #286

I think that comes down to the integrity of the juror. brer cat Sep 2013 #310

Thanks for the action on abusive jurors. Appreciate it. (nt) Paladin Sep 2013 #33

Nice post... CJCRANE Sep 2013 #35

... Cleita Sep 2013 #36

Brilliant! The disruptors will finally fear having posts hidden LittleBlue Sep 2013 #37

Thanks for the update. n/t peace13 Sep 2013 #39

Censorship reflects... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #40

Yes and boorish behavior reflects on the individuals lack of respect for others. bluesbassman Sep 2013 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author LanternWaste Sep 2013 #58

No, it reflects a realization that some people are the posting equivalent of Ted Bundy stevenleser Sep 2013 #62

To be clear... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #81

Just wanted to say... pipi_k Sep 2013 #125

Agreed... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #151

LOL. "The owner has an agenda." You make it sound like a bad thing! Hekate Sep 2013 #196

Strange... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #313

Saying they do well means they run the site well. Any comparisons to Beck are despicable. Hekate Sep 2013 #358

Lol, please... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #371

Meh. The door goes both ways. Hekate Sep 2013 #373

Ah, the old love it or leave it cop out. Phillyindy Sep 2013 #374

I think Hekate meant that both "sides" get hidden posts... cyberswede Sep 2013 #376

That would be false. Phillyindy Sep 2013 #380

Of course the owner has an agenda. It's written up succinctly in the Mission Statement. So what? cbayer Sep 2013 #208

So maybe you should just reread my comment Phillyindy Sep 2013 #314

You can read the Site Owners' TOP SECRET AGENDA right here!!! MADem Sep 2013 #248

Congrats. Phillyindy Sep 2013 #315

Just sayin'... AngryOldDem Sep 2013 #303

Agreed... Phillyindy Sep 2013 #316

Skinner Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #43

Fuck that I'm alerting this! Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2013 #46

Damn,...beat me to it. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #259

I am expecting to have even more posts alerted nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #47

More posts alerted View profile in an attempt to get *their enemies* hidden ! Kolesar Sep 2013 #92

Waiting on the world to change, huh? tavalon Sep 2013 #335

Nope, just being realistic nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #359

Abusive while performing jury service CountAllVotes Sep 2013 #48

I wish they did something about the bullies nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #64

This person is now on my ignore list CountAllVotes Sep 2013 #82

Hugs nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #85

After your dad died! CountAllVotes Sep 2013 #96

She did not bully nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #113

Oh I see CountAllVotes Sep 2013 #148

Same here nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #162

Hi nadinbrzinsski blue14u Sep 2013 #242

Hi, welcome to DU nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #263

Thank you.. blue14u Sep 2013 #264

I intend to nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #265

This is why pipi_k Sep 2013 #389

And trust me, I try nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #393

.... hlthe2b Sep 2013 #93

How do you know who it was? cui bono Sep 2013 #199

The style of the writing CountAllVotes Sep 2013 #234

I had the same experience with a juror. dgibby Sep 2013 #159

Considering a lot of jury comments would get nuked in the forums, I agree. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #188

I have seen a few of these posted ---they are disgusting warrant46 Sep 2013 #346

This *exact* thing has happened to me and the bullying is bullshit. LaydeeBug Sep 2013 #386

Thank You !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #49

I think being unable to post after 5 hides is a great idea. LanternWaste Sep 2013 #51

These enhancements sound terrific, but what's the policy on twerking? Orrex Sep 2013 #54

Good question! Let's see if this gets hidden... stevenleser Sep 2013 #69

Locking. Dr. Strange Oct 2013 #405

Great incentive libodem Sep 2013 #55

Oh, my, I've been here 10 years and I never noticed that tavalon Sep 2013 #336

Excellent changes! Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #59

SIG Ellipsis Sep 2013 #60

Nice updates to already innovative forum software. Thanks..nt Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #61

Thanks for all you do! I love this place. hunter Sep 2013 #63

Perhaps you could consider doing what I do tavalon Sep 2013 #338

These Do Look Like Improvements, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2013 #65

Thanks Skinner Phlem Sep 2013 #66

Thank you... CherokeeDem Sep 2013 #67

Sounds good. nt Vanje Sep 2013 #70

Does the grace period effect rude juror comments? Ian David Sep 2013 #73

If you are keeping people from posting after 5 x's you should also monitor for excessive alerts. dkf Sep 2013 #74

Bans should be for 6/6 jury results. The haters are shotgunning their alerts and hoping for a jury Kolesar Sep 2013 #83

^^^ This. Monitor for excessive and vendetta alerts by concerted groups. Squinch Sep 2013 #112

Some on here just try to see how many posts they can get deleted. It's like B Calm Dec 2013 #407

My favorite part... Wait Wut Sep 2013 #75

Yes, that may also make some people think when their hostility is exposed in comments. freshwest Sep 2013 #184

Agree wholeheartedly. n/t cui bono Sep 2013 #202

Best thing you'v done since nuking META! Thanks for making this a better place Rowdyboy Sep 2013 #76

Everything here seems like a good idea. madaboutharry Sep 2013 #77

Excellent changes! FourScore Sep 2013 #78

What percentage of hidden posts actually get a 6-0 or even a 0-6 vote? Ian David Sep 2013 #84

And so the jurists on DU are just like people picked off the street for live jury duty tavalon Sep 2013 #340

I'm wondering if not enough material is going to be sent to MIRT, but over-all, I like these changes Ian David Sep 2013 #86

Oh well. What the heck? I applaud this move even though it means I'll have to tone it down. Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #87

I bet a lot of us 0 hidden posters are quite active. (Check my post count.) tblue37 Sep 2013 #245

Bumping this up JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #88

Correct. With that yellow alert, there can be no excuse for not knowing. RC Sep 2013 #102

But if you don't violate the rules Aerows Sep 2013 #107

Most of the time. RC Sep 2013 #115

"But if you don't violate the rules View profile then the jury is going to support you?" Pab Sungenis Sep 2013 #129

Well, you do have a point about the pro-gay posts Aerows Sep 2013 #134

"Gungeoneers" have to watch their steps, it's a mind field at times. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #179

with more than 600 jury turns under my belt, I'd agree, "MOST" of the time hlthe2b Sep 2013 #321

This is something I don't understand tavalon Sep 2013 #341

Not a clue, but I do use "latest" page as a starting point... hlthe2b Sep 2013 #342

I wonder how much that goes on though JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #114

Well - since I am at least temporarily without a star - Ms. Toad Sep 2013 #167

I don't even know what a "hidden post" is. SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2013 #95

Awwww, all my ruder sockpuppets haz a sad.. denbot Sep 2013 #97

Very good. H2O Man Sep 2013 #98

Good changes and great website ! nt steve2470 Sep 2013 #99

Two years? How time flies! hedgehog Sep 2013 #103

Sounds totally reasonable to me n/t Aerows Sep 2013 #104

Excellent malaise Sep 2013 #105

All very good/reasonable zipplewrath Sep 2013 #109

Sounds good to me. City Lights Sep 2013 #110

Thank you so much for making this an awesome place LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #111

I second that comment. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #120

Good work and Thank You. GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #116

given the severity of 5 hides Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #118

Good idea, either that or there should be some new penalty for frivolous alerts quinnox Sep 2013 #136

You should double the number of entries on the jury blacklist as well. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2013 #122

Thank you for these updates Skinner and Co! Hydra Sep 2013 #126

Huzzah! BumRushDaShow Sep 2013 #127

I like it. Sounds like the small percentage of duers who would brag about their hidden posts quinnox Sep 2013 #128

Q: Is there anyway to prevent the "group gang-ups" that happen sometimes? IdaBriggs Sep 2013 #130

Some juries feel that calling a poster a "ratfucker" is OK. MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #131

Also, I have seen individuals targeted for attack. Some have survived rhett o rick Sep 2013 #163

If 100 Tories or 100 Larouchies showed up to *disrupt* the Democratic forum with half-truths Kolesar Sep 2013 #172

No matter how 'popular' you might be or how 'popular' you see yourself Grateful for Hope Sep 2013 #178

If it seems harsh... MyNameGoesHere Sep 2013 #132

Looks good to me redstatebluegirl Sep 2013 #133

Looks like positive steps. liberal N proud Sep 2013 #135

These changes sound good to me. HappyMe Sep 2013 #137

Thanks Skinner and DU Team! hibbing Sep 2013 #138

outstanding! yuiyoshida Sep 2013 #139

I am the 86%! Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #140

"The administrators are getting increasingly concerned about the small number of members... RevStPatrick Sep 2013 #142

Thanks all. It's a good improvement. n/t finecraft Sep 2013 #143

I don't have a problem with the 5 post rule, as long as.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2013 #144

I'm a "low post" DU veteran.... rppper Sep 2013 #145

It's the low-count posters who post unnecessary rude comments that draw attention. pacalo Sep 2013 #216

"STARTING 90 DAYS FROM TODAY, if you have five hidden posts on your account you will be unable..." Taverner Sep 2013 #146

The answer is to not bite dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #149

Sometimes that is not so easy Taverner Sep 2013 #150

They feed on responses. dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #153

On this I concur dipsydoodle. To handle ignorance - IGNORE it laserhaas Sep 2013 #228

No they don't nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #231

Nadine, I just took the plunge just now.... defacto7 Sep 2013 #293

Good luck nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #300

Try clever, biting sarcasm, as opposed to a lot of profanity and troll accusations. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #173

Just keep asking them questions about their position and stay on topic. cui bono Sep 2013 #204

Buttoned lips is a survival art in the Gungeon. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #183

I concur. And as much as I adore dipsy, I take some issue with "not bite" laserhaas Sep 2013 #225

Excellent policy changes all around. kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #147

Most excellent. This should improve things considerably. THanks! nolabear Sep 2013 #152

Thanks. K&R n/t myrna minx Sep 2013 #155

The alert system has been broken for awhile, good to see this change DontTreadOnMe Sep 2013 #156

Well Juror #4's response is now going to be the automatic response of the system. n/t whopis01 Sep 2013 #194

Thanks for trying to improve this place...I have a question. zeemike Sep 2013 #158

K&R! And apparently three other members recced this at the exact same time I did. Rhiannon12866 Sep 2013 #160

Thank you guys. You take great care of this wonderful forum. juajen Sep 2013 #161

Good stuff! Stinky The Clown Sep 2013 #165

Good ideas MissDeeds Sep 2013 #166

Excellent Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #168

awesome....and, thank you. hopemountain Sep 2013 #170

Sounds good to me, as long as the 5 posts rule is subject to appeal. DireStrike Sep 2013 #174

Thank you . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2013 #175

Great ideas all the way around. AAO Sep 2013 #177

There may be only a small number of over 5 hiders but Phentex Sep 2013 #182

... Solly Mack Sep 2013 #185

Evolve pscot Sep 2013 #190

Name Change Amnesty OmahaBlueDog Sep 2013 #193

The jury/moderation system here is one of the best ones I've seen... penultimate Sep 2013 #195

Oh, sure, demonize the 1/2 of 1 per cent ! eppur_se_muova Sep 2013 #198

I have, at times, been a dick while on Jury Duty. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #200

i enjoy serving on the jury mgcgulfcoast Sep 2013 #201

No TOS check box? The Neidermeyer / Marmalard faction of DU won't like that at all. Amerigo Vespucci Sep 2013 #206

Somehow I suspect Pale Blue Dot Sep 2013 #223

Ya think?! hlthe2b Sep 2013 #345

I'm certainly down with these rules Iwillnevergiveup Sep 2013 #207

That all sounds fine with us walkerbait41 Sep 2013 #209

Nice post Hitler. progressoid Sep 2013 #210

Appreciate the wonderful good faith attention to detail. laserhaas Sep 2013 #212

Thanks for striving to make this forum a better place. emulatorloo Sep 2013 #215

I think these are all good changes. Pale Blue Dot Sep 2013 #217

Good changes - thank you. David__77 Sep 2013 #219

I've served on several juries where the post was reported due to disagreeing with it Trekologer Sep 2013 #220

Sounds like an improvement TexasProgresive Sep 2013 #221

K&R. pacalo Sep 2013 #222

Fine. westerebus Sep 2013 #224

Thank you Duckhunter935 Sep 2013 #227

I like it. To keep it positive Robb Sep 2013 #230

Seems reasonable and sensible, keep up the good work! DrewFlorida Sep 2013 #232

Glad to see this happening !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2013 #233

K & R Patriot 76 Sep 2013 #236

Miss DU2 with a passion PatrynXX Sep 2013 #237

HIDE MY POST RIGHT NOW!!! Common Sense Party Sep 2013 #238

Duzy tavalon Sep 2013 #343

Yep. I ca't remember the name...Walt something? Common Sense Party Sep 2013 #351

Walt Starr.... hlthe2b Sep 2013 #357

Yes. Common Sense Party Sep 2013 #383

it would be great if all websites were as well done as DU. BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2013 #239

5 hidden posts? so if everybody loves me, I'm safe? Baclava Sep 2013 #241

I suggest that if 5 hides causes you to lose posting privileges, you still should be rhett o rick Sep 2013 #250

Well it proves one thing! Cryptoad Sep 2013 #251

Alerting. Zorra Sep 2013 #253

THANK YOU!!!! Marrah_G Sep 2013 #255

I'm really impressed. Daemonaquila Sep 2013 #258

Kudos. Looks like sensible stuff to me. n/t D23MIURG23 Sep 2013 #260

Thank you Skinner blue14u Sep 2013 #262

Thanks Skinner, and the rest of the admins RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #267

All this sounds reasonable, and I can live with it. NBachers Sep 2013 #270

I promise no more Skinner Box jokes .... no pizzas for me Botany Sep 2013 #271

I generally think these rules are very reasonable, I do caution on one thing however Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #272

This sounds like a move in the right direction... MrMickeysMom Sep 2013 #273

Thank you! Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #274

How's about letting a jury member alert on an alert? dkf Sep 2013 #275

You can alert on jury results. Look at the bottom of the reslts and you will see the alert button. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #277

Thanks but I'm more concerned about abusive alerters. dkf Sep 2013 #282

Well I am on Mirt and a host of several rooms and I can tell you things have gone downhill very hrmjustin Sep 2013 #283

Thanks. I bet they've already discussed this. dkf Sep 2013 #284

Mirt was alerted the same time the rest of DU was about this What I am saying is if you see hrmjustin Sep 2013 #285

Sounds like censorship to me. pam4water Sep 2013 #280

You can start an anything goes discussion forum really easily. And I will bet it will be a hit stevenleser Sep 2013 #332

Just realized 90 days from now is Christmas. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #287

Instead of 5 in 90 days, why not a % threshold? PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #288

It's really not that difficult to not get a post hidden Marrah_G Sep 2013 #289

several of my hidden posts PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #292

Perhaps in time you will figure out not to take the bait Marrah_G Sep 2013 #295

The burden is placed on the wrong people then. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #296

That ain't gonna change here nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #301

I hate to have to have an ignore list. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #306

Yeah, buy a few will goad you nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #307

Sometimes stepping away from the computer and denying those people what they want tavalon Sep 2013 #325

"Obamabots' love of GWB's warmongering" is "not worthy of being hidden"? Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #331

Not worthy of being hidden. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #349

Agreed Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #364

You seem to have left one out pintobean Sep 2013 #370

Because, that one did deserve to be hidden PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #372

Keep up the good work. /nt pintobean Sep 2013 #378

I've had 1 post hidden so far and I went out of my way to get that. Kaleva Sep 2013 #368

Good on you -- this should help. Can we look forward to a few more as Primary season approaches? Hekate Sep 2013 #290

I am not looking forward to the primaries Marrah_G Sep 2013 #297

There was a special, GD forum for primaries. Vanje Sep 2013 #377

I agree 100% cyberswede Sep 2013 #382

Great ideas and I hope there are improvements defacto7 Sep 2013 #291

Thanks for addressing juror rudeness. spooky3 Sep 2013 #294

Thanks for the update... Deuce Sep 2013 #299

Yeah, hi! Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #302

Just this: AngryOldDem Sep 2013 #304

Love this! Thank you, Skinner! oxymoron Sep 2013 #305

While I applaud any efforts to improve this website, there are other issues that should be addressed Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #308

^^This is a clear example of "targeting a poster and a group^^ hlthe2b Sep 2013 #319

Sounds Like A Good Plan distantearlywarning Sep 2013 #309

Bullying by jurors ideologically aligned with bullies who attack without consequences carolinayellowdog Sep 2013 #312

^ THIS Phillyindy Sep 2013 #317

Good. I think this is going to work. Autumn Sep 2013 #318

Excellent tweaks! ColesCountyDem Sep 2013 #320

On another note.... Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #322

! Turborama Sep 2013 #363

! Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #366

Yes indeedy! Turborama Sep 2013 #369

Thank You! Yuugal Sep 2013 #323

Now, I get why DU was running so slow yesterday tavalon Sep 2013 #324

thanks Skinner lunatica Sep 2013 #329

Can I alert on this thread Hutzpa Sep 2013 #339

But I like Trumad! CreekDog Sep 2013 #350

Absence makes the heart grow fonder. winter is coming Sep 2013 #352

i like cjeekdgg Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #367

this seems like a reasonable thing to do. samsingh Sep 2013 #354

What is considered abusive language in jury comments? Kingofalldems Sep 2013 #355

Thanks for the transparency Politicub Sep 2013 #356

And the failed experiment continues. name not needed Sep 2013 #360

The best way to handle the "alert trolls" Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #379

Thank you IrishAyes Sep 2013 #361

Excellent Administrators bobGandolf Sep 2013 #365

***** possible bug ********* NMDemDist2 Sep 2013 #375

All very good ideas! Chemisse Sep 2013 #381

hi guy... Divine Discontent Sep 2013 #384

How about building a court of appeals into the process? 47of74 Sep 2013 #385

Great changes. redgreenandblue Sep 2013 #387

I am amazed that DU is still online with all the attacks it's had over the years nolabels Sep 2013 #388

Thank you, JimboBillyBubbaBob Sep 2013 #391

It's hard to believe DU3 is 2 years old. Thanks for the had work. santamargarita Sep 2013 #392

Well done, Skinner! fascisthunter Oct 2013 #400

I like it lovuian Oct 2013 #401

So it's going back to moderating? wakemeupwhenitsover Oct 2013 #402

Excellent. Excellent. Excellent. David Zephyr Oct 2013 #403

I just had a 6-0 hide lead to a troll ban Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #404

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #406