Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Activist Headquarters
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Is Not The Answer - Sorry [View all]strategery blunder
(4,225 posts)95. In Elizabeth Warren's defense, she still has another 4-8 years to build that history.
She hasn't been a congresscritter for very long, but so far, since entering the national stage, she has been consistent. She just hasn't been at it for a quarter century like Bernie has.
This is coming from a Bernie supporter, btw. I fear the damage that a Hillary presidency will cause to "one person, one vote." A Hillary presidency will move the country even closer to "one dollar, one vote" IMO.
And yes, I fear that the damage done in the meantime if we do not elect Bernie will be extensive. But that does not necessarily preclude Elizabeth Warren (or for that matter, anyone else) from taking up that mantle in the future.
Note: I do, however, fear the Republicans more than I do Hillary.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your absolutely right.....let's look to win and only look back when this is done....
Pauldg47
Apr 2016
#36
Please. If Bernie doesn't win this time, which it looks like he won't, you'll be excited about
StevieM
Apr 2016
#47
I didn't say there was anything inherently wrong with Bernie now. It all depends on who the voters
StevieM
Apr 2016
#59
I guess it is not so much that I can't support Bernie in a primary. I just don't want to.
StevieM
Apr 2016
#68
Yes, Warren will be elected at that time if she's the best person for the job.
seekthetruth
Apr 2016
#77
I think I said he was a very good president. But still...let's look at the record.
StevieM
Apr 2016
#76
TPP and the other "trade" agreements are enough to relegate Obama to the dustbin of history
emsimon33
Apr 2016
#89
I have not seen any defense for Hillary's candidacy at all other than that she is a woman.
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#86
In Elizabeth Warren's defense, she still has another 4-8 years to build that history.
strategery blunder
Apr 2016
#95
Not sure that the Rs would actually be all that worse than Hillary were it not for Ruth Ginsberg.
KPN
Apr 2016
#108
You remind us that 8 more years of Hillary will mean 8 more years of Bill. Yech!
virgista
Apr 2016
#122
It isn't about not liking Hillary. It is about not liking the corruption and lying that she
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#79
It is silly to think that Hillary's Supreme Court nominees will be any different than
StevieM
Apr 2016
#48
I doubt that Clinton's nominations would be any better than Obama's current PoS. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#53
To each their own. I consider Sonia Sotomayer the best appointment to the Supreme Court
StevieM
Apr 2016
#84
Garland said he supports the Citizens United decision. He is conservative. We
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#117
Between rich backers of her campaign and the republican congress, we will move farther to the right
Doctor_J
Apr 2016
#113
The same place we've always been - burdened with the awful weight of the government
PatrickforO
Apr 2016
#33
In the 1930's people in Europe and the USofA were struggling to survive. In Germany and Italy
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#55
This is what the Party elites of both parties & their puppet masters don't get
emsimon33
Apr 2016
#88
You really think a Trump presidency would be better than Obama's? How does giving the party of
uppityperson
Apr 2016
#109