Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(127,761 posts)
5. I'm not in a position to address the questions that you asked, particularly regarding time
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 01:34 AM
Feb 2016

and attention because it is obvious that the surgeons would have to divert time and attention to learn the procedure and techniques in order to make it successful.

At the same time, I can also understand why a woman would want to experience the entire process of pregnancy and the maternal bond that develops during carrying a baby as compared to surrogacy or adoption. However, the money for this attempt belongs to the woman (couple?) involved rather than public money that is being diverted from providing other necessary health care in an either-or situation since I doubt that the operation was funded by an insurance company or a government health care program because it is an experimental procedure.

I would prefer to be positive and wish the best for the woman involved and hope that she is able to bear children in the future rather than viewing it as a trade-off. Thus far, nothing has been shown which indicates anyone was adversely affected by this event. If there was a trade-off involved and someone was denied fundamental health care then I would certainly be willing to reconsider based on those negative implications.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cleveland Clinic surgeons...»Reply #5