Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Burger King Worker [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)21. I tend to squint a bit at shit coming out of FORBES magazine (because that mag owner is a
libertarian lunatic, among other reasons) but someone on his staff did do an analysis of the "buying power" of this wage:
...Theyre clearly using some rather strange exchange rate as 110 DK is $16.35 at todays rate. Still impressive as compared to the US.
But thats not enough: if we want to compare wages we need to compare what they will actually buy. That is, we must adjust for Purchasing Power Parity, or PPP. And the correction there is 1.4. That is, in terms of what you can actually buy with any amount of money in the Danish economy we must divide the market exchange rate by 1.4. Which gives us $11.70 per hour as the Danish minimum wage.
Now, you might think that this is all fiddling around with the numbers and youd be right. But its also fiddling around with the numbers in the correct manner. As we can see when we go to look at the OECDs numbers for real minimum wage. Thats here. Set that to hourly and youll see that, among the OECD countries, the Australian minimum wage is in fact. $10.50, The French $10.70 and so on. Thats the real minimum wage, thats what that minimum would buy you, in America, at current American prices.
Denmarks not on that list as it being a very small country its not in that OECD database. But the corrections Ive applied are exactly what are used to correct those OECD numbers.
And theres one other thing to note. A $15 an hour minimum wage in the US (by definition, PPP numbers are set to US prices, so $15 is both the market and PPP exchange rate value for the US) would be nearly 50% higher than the minimum wage in any other OECD country, ie any other rich and large country.
But thats not enough: if we want to compare wages we need to compare what they will actually buy. That is, we must adjust for Purchasing Power Parity, or PPP. And the correction there is 1.4. That is, in terms of what you can actually buy with any amount of money in the Danish economy we must divide the market exchange rate by 1.4. Which gives us $11.70 per hour as the Danish minimum wage.
Now, you might think that this is all fiddling around with the numbers and youd be right. But its also fiddling around with the numbers in the correct manner. As we can see when we go to look at the OECDs numbers for real minimum wage. Thats here. Set that to hourly and youll see that, among the OECD countries, the Australian minimum wage is in fact. $10.50, The French $10.70 and so on. Thats the real minimum wage, thats what that minimum would buy you, in America, at current American prices.
Denmarks not on that list as it being a very small country its not in that OECD database. But the corrections Ive applied are exactly what are used to correct those OECD numbers.
And theres one other thing to note. A $15 an hour minimum wage in the US (by definition, PPP numbers are set to US prices, so $15 is both the market and PPP exchange rate value for the US) would be nearly 50% higher than the minimum wage in any other OECD country, ie any other rich and large country.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/08/12/denmark-does-not-have-a-20-minimum-wage-try-11-70-instead/
At the end of the day, though, we need to move the minimum wage up. The federal wage in this century is an utter disgrace. It's just not enough. Odds are, as I said elsewhere, that the Congress will be dragged, kicking, screaming, whining, crying, by states and cities that do the right thing FIRST...leaving the federal government to follow along, as they do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny, coming from a fan of the "champion" of the $15/hour movement who only supports $12.
Scuba
Jan 2016
#3
Can't we all pleasantly agree that Denmark has a system that is better for people than here?
mucifer
Jan 2016
#30
Must give credit where credit is due. You got your response in within two minutes.
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#61
I think a lot are, nowadays. It wasn't the case in years past, when fast food work
MADem
Jan 2016
#14
I tend to squint a bit at shit coming out of FORBES magazine (because that mag owner is a
MADem
Jan 2016
#21
So double my food price, but triple my wage and give me benefits including health care ...
Scuba
Jan 2016
#20
And I would bet there are some correlations between those folks and the responses here n/t
n2doc
Jan 2016
#29
That would be good to know, but local purchasing power is HIGHER in Denmark overall.
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#41
They also have a FRACTION of our population, almost 6 million or so...vs 330 million
snooper2
Jan 2016
#43
A roughly 16% higher cost of living for a substantually higher standard of living is doable.
Bubzer
Jan 2016
#46
Congress could raise the Federal minimum to $15 an hour TODAY _if the RW in Congress wanted to_
Sunlei
Jan 2016
#49
My 1st job was at BK when min wage was $2.30. Ultimately I was "promoted" to manager
corkhead
Jan 2016
#58
Burger King probably still upset that they had to pull back from becoming a Canadian company...
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#59