Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)

33. Probably.

Reply to MineralMan (Reply #32)

Tue Jun 2, 2015, 04:31 PM

Jun 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the Democratic Party Definitely Doesn't Need [View all] MineralMan Jun 2015 OP

What an excellent idea! Actually talk positively about issues? guillaumeb Jun 2015 #1

Well, that's what I'm recommending. MineralMan Jun 2015 #2

Total agreement. guillaumeb Jun 2015 #4

It's early. The Democratic candidates will get much dirtier towards each other as this goes on. morningfog Jun 2015 #3

I'm making a recommendation, not giving an order. MineralMan Jun 2015 #5

Who said you were giving an order? morningfog Jun 2015 #24

Just so long as there is an understanding that ... ananda Jun 2015 #6

Of course. I have no problem with criticism. MineralMan Jun 2015 #9

Define attack whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #7

Attacks are not simply criticism. MineralMan Jun 2015 #8

But what if those things are true? whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #11

What things, specifically? MineralMan Jun 2015 #15

The labels of oligarch, warmonger, tool of the corporations... whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #21

Uh, no. None of the current Democratic candidates are any of those things. MineralMan Jun 2015 #22

Like a mother's love whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #25

I would say accusing a candidate of trying to get people injured or harmed geek tragedy Jun 2015 #14

I saw that whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #17

I thought that was just kind of silly, really. MineralMan Jun 2015 #23

gee, you mean do as you say, not as you do. cali Jun 2015 #10

As negative? Did I attack a candidate? MineralMan Jun 2015 #12

Your last sentence is totally hypocritical. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #16

I'm still waiting for that link to a post where I attacked a Democratic MineralMan Jun 2015 #31

Yeah, there's nothing you hate more than "pablum about dems". Obviously. DanTex Jun 2015 #38

While most people here support Sanders for his positions, a certain geek tragedy Jun 2015 #13

Exactly. Senator Sanders has it right. MineralMan Jun 2015 #20

+1 JoePhilly Jun 2015 #28

Voters are supposed to scrutinize the candidates. Good and Bad. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #18

Oh, all of the candidates can "stand the heat." MineralMan Jun 2015 #26

That's the risk that candidates take when running for office. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #27

I see. Well, I guess we have no choice in the matter, then. MineralMan Jun 2015 #29

OK. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #30

Of course it is a choice. MineralMan Jun 2015 #32

Probably. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #33

We need more fire-breathing mediums who channel the spirit of Huey Long. nt peecoolyour Jun 2015 #19

Only two types of people come to this site. Hardcore Exilednight Jun 2015 #34

That's not true. There are many dedicated Democratic MineralMan Jun 2015 #35

i understand the TOS. But trust me when I say, no one of importance or Exilednight Jun 2015 #37

I agree with you MineralMan. This was done the last time she ran as well. Not to worry, she'll win. Laser102 Jun 2015 #36