Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jim Webb [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)154. There you go again, with the nasty commentary. Most people here are having a CIVIL and spirited
discussion about Webb's candidacy. You're the one posting the "STFU" remarks.
If you're not "afraid" of any objections to this guy (and there are many--the first being that he is not even close to anyone's definition of "liberal"--he's a conservative, plain and simple) then you'd let the conversation proceed, and contribute salient responses, rather than weighing in with a "Watch what you say, watch what you do" series of blatant insults impugning the motives of anyone who doesn't think the way you do.
What's your approach to this discussion? Let's break it down.
Rex
146. Careful, scared little rabbits on DU don't like democracy very much.
View profile
Oh sure they talk a big game, but when it comes to anyone but their favorite pony they instantly inform the swarm to attack. Strange behavior for 'progressives'.
146. Careful, scared little rabbits on DU don't like democracy very much.
View profile
Oh sure they talk a big game, but when it comes to anyone but their favorite pony they instantly inform the swarm to attack. Strange behavior for 'progressives'.
Anyone who does not agree with you:
a. Are scared little rabbits
b. Don't like democracy.
c. Are Swarmers who are defending their favorite pony (not feminists, not anti-NRA, not liberals, not even people with another "favorite" candidate--just "Swarmers"--oooh kay).
d. Are behaving strangely for "progressives."
The person afraid of conversation, to my eye, would be the person who flings four insults in a two sentence post that have absolutely nothing to do with the real issues at hand.
But hey, knock yourself out!
We see you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not a question of morality at all, it's more down to temperance and judgment and impulsivity.
MADem
Nov 2014
#12
It doesn't always come down to temperance. I've been married 3 times and I am still
Luminous Animal
Nov 2014
#14
He's talked about it--he's a walker. His wives don't get too mad because he is generous.
MADem
Nov 2014
#20
I'm not a fan of Webb. Never have, never will be. I just find this "o-o-o-o-o-o-oh" 3 marriage thing
Luminous Animal
Nov 2014
#27
Proud are you? Getting a head start of smearing a Democratic candidate before the GOP
Luminous Animal
Nov 2014
#34
Petraeus, Ricardo Sanchez and Stanley MacChrystal would each last about 5 minutes
KingCharlemagne
Nov 2014
#17
I've had two husbands, I'm tired of judging people based on their marriage habits.
redstatebluegirl
Nov 2014
#55
I think you're wrong. Voters not only care about how often people have been married, but to WHOM
MADem
Nov 2014
#139
If you recall--and I think you're misremembering--Clinton's people did a very good job of pushing
MADem
Nov 2014
#149
People DO are about politicians' (and movie stars', and TV celebrities' and other assorted famous-
MADem
Nov 2014
#158
Clinton also had higher approval ratings than Saint Ronnie ever got DURING the impeachment
Major Nikon
Nov 2014
#159
Precisely how many marriages may one have before they are ethically disqualified?
LanternWaste
Nov 2014
#82
We have to ask the GOP, afterall they pull the strings and make all the rules
LawDeeDah
Nov 2014
#84
You might want to acquaint yourself with his full resume before you jump in with both feet.
MADem
Nov 2014
#142
Seriously? That's your comment? That's your take away from all this conversation?
MADem
Nov 2014
#153
Here's what he told the WSJ 8 days after he tipped control of the Senate to Democrats in 2006:
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2014
#4
Going after the Presidency is a game of winning too. And the game is to win not once, but twice.
MADem
Nov 2014
#16
I was beginning to think I was the only person here who was aware of the guy's resume... nt
MADem
Nov 2014
#13
He looks better than Hillary on foreign policy, economic policy, criminal justice.
Comrade Grumpy
Nov 2014
#9
I'm quick with research on Jim Webb.. you going to accuse me like you accused MADem of being
Cha
Nov 2014
#38
"Jim Webb dead wrong on global warming pollution" from 2011.. but, what else do we have to go on?
Cha
Nov 2014
#37
Ah yes, Virginia politics.. they had the creepy Bob greedy McDonnell and now Terry McAuliffe is
Cha
Nov 2014
#43
Your marriage critique sounds like something from the Moral Majority circa 1982
LordGlenconner
Nov 2014
#51
It's interesting to me how many DUers will not even look up a politician's wiki before deciding
merrily
Nov 2014
#63
Maybe a JIM WEBB group should be added to the "Democrats" topic??????????
HereSince1628
Nov 2014
#53
After over 80 replies, I guess most of the 'HRC dogs' are sitting back and laughing
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#79
Laugh all you like but Webb did not think Iraq was a good idea, and Hillary did.
LawDeeDah
Nov 2014
#86
I was mostly wondering how someone could speak so highly of a sick soul like Coe's.
LawDeeDah
Nov 2014
#97
I speak highly of my plumber. So why don't you prove this phantom association?
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#103
Except for the obvious gender, how is this war college vet an improvement over Hillary?
librechik
Nov 2014
#91
okay, he would be more restained on foreign policy issues - perhaps than Hillary - that I like
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2014
#119
he did oppose the U.S. entry into both the Gulf War of 1992 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. He
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2014
#132