General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jim Webb [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)before "weighing in" with that remark, I can't be terribly serious with you, because I don't think your motive is serious discussion.
Who knew that the Constitution was magically changed overnight, and Bill Clinton would be allowed to run again for a THIRD term? Why Cosmic Kitten, apparently! Unless you're saying "It's the WIFE's fault" if a husband strays? That's not what you're saying, I trust--because, ya know, that kind of remark is a bit, errrm...sexist. Hillary just shoulda "kept sweet" to keep that horndog home, is that your point? I sure hope not!!!
And the issue--if you read the thread, and you plainly did not--is not "infidelity"--it's more to do with stick-to-it-ive-ness. This guy QUITS. He quits marriages, he quits a cabinet post, and he quits an easy reelection opportunity in the Senate. But you didn't take that point, even though it was sticking up like a big old nail that needs hammering down...! Those aren't "straw man stuffs (SIC)" -- those are what is called "facts" and those DO matter when considering candidates for election.