General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jim Webb [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)They did get younger and younger.
You go on and support the guy--get one of those NRA stickers with the campaign literature. He'll rake in that vote with no trouble. A rating from the NRA, and all...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203282.html
And he also thinks that the states should decide the gay marriage issue, a stance that got Jimmy Carter raked over the coals (for saying it about TX and only TX, too) and thrown out on the trash heap on this very forum. I got banned from a group for defending the guy, too.
http://www.nbcnews.com/watch/meet-the-press/jim-webb-says-states-deciding-gay-marriage-is-best-338023491905
A Webb presidency would result in a much larger military. You really think most members here are down with that?
OTOH, it's entirely possible--even LIKELY--that he's auditioning for the VP slot. The downside to his taking that slot is that he'd be unlikely to fleet up after eight years, which might leave the WH vulnerable to a GOP leader (that's assuming we get a D win in 16) in 24.
I don't think I'm the one who needs to go back to the drawing board. I think you might want to research the guy a bit more closely if you intend to support him, so that you understand exactly what you're getting, here.