Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, Sir, It Does The Magistrate Jul 2014 #1
stiglitz would disagree -- some what. nt xchrom Jul 2014 #3
Marx certainly thought so Warpy Jul 2014 #151
I Agree The Matter Could Be Mended, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2014 #152
+1 nt Live and Learn Jul 2014 #157
It would be impossible to argue other wise el_bryanto Jul 2014 #2
creates opportunities..... daleanime Jul 2014 #5
Well command economies also have inequalities el_bryanto Jul 2014 #8
So that makes it OK? daleanime Jul 2014 #9
I think that any economic system on a scale of the united states will produce inequalities el_bryanto Jul 2014 #11
Then we agree.... daleanime Jul 2014 #43
RE: your last paragraph....... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #117
So capitalism creates opportunities in theory Raksha Jul 2014 #50
Of course it does Lee-Lee Jul 2014 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Jul 2014 #7
Nope. Like the Scandinavian countries, Iceland is a capitalist country. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #25
Perhaps, by definition... CanSocDem Jul 2014 #6
Capital itself is theft. Inequality is not so much the byproduct as the essential product. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #10
Theft is taking money that you haven't earned. Either by.... clarice Jul 2014 #12
Ron Or Rand Paul Could Not Have Said That Better, Ma'am.... The Magistrate Jul 2014 #14
Perhaps Sir, but am I correct or not? nt clarice Jul 2014 #16
What Is 'Earned' And What Is 'Work', Ma'am? The Magistrate Jul 2014 #21
Respectfully Sir... clarice Jul 2014 #27
The Text For The Sermon, Ma'am, Is This.... The Magistrate Jul 2014 #33
Sir... clarice Jul 2014 #37
A 'Flat Taxer', Are You, Ma'am? The Magistrate Jul 2014 #40
No, not a Fat Taxer per se. nt clarice Jul 2014 #59
Then What, Ma'am? Because You just Called For A Flat Tax The Magistrate Jul 2014 #61
Well, there is the Neal Boortz-supported sham known as the Fair Tax: HughBeaumont Jul 2014 #72
Without getting into a tax code debate...... clarice Jul 2014 #68
It Is Up To You To Support That, Ma'am, In The Fields Under Discussion The Magistrate Jul 2014 #73
I don't think in the way you would define that... quaker bill Jul 2014 #115
I would call that lousy business practices. nt clarice Jul 2014 #116
Why is that "lousy business practices"? Taking as much money in profit...... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #118
Who ARE the masses? And who would be considered "NOT" the masses. nt clarice Jul 2014 #129
Everybody but the owners of the means of production..... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #133
Who would be the "owners of production" Individuals? Government?...... clarice Jul 2014 #134
socialist_n_TN ? clarice Jul 2014 #139
Yes?... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #147
Who sits on the boards of corporations?..... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #143
Thank you, have a GREAT weekend. nt clarice Jul 2014 #146
But very survivable quaker bill Jul 2014 #122
The word "theft" in that particular example does not apply. nt clarice Jul 2014 #127
Why Not, Ma'am? The Magistrate Jul 2014 #130
Maybe through collective thought and effort we can erect a system that is good for about 99% of us nolabels Jul 2014 #144
There's no sense reinventing the wheel...... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #148
If it worked then what has happened to it, where is it and how do we indentfy it? nolabels Jul 2014 #149
This cannot be repeated enough, when "risk capital" is brought up: Maedhros Jul 2014 #48
Capital is the theft of labor. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #15
Following that line..... clarice Jul 2014 #18
How about folks who enjoy their jobs and feel that they are fairly compensated? Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #34
Absolutely. The theft is inherent to the system. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #41
Some inmates are "institutionalized", and come to love their prison. Maedhros Jul 2014 #49
So when JK Rowling is rewarded with billions of pounds for writing the Harry Potter books, Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #56
No, JK Rowling is part of the Bourgeoisie Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #58
Ah. So there is some income level below which you are being stolen from, Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #62
The small business owner is petit bourgeoisie Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #65
Curious, and not being snarky, clarice Jul 2014 #67
I didn't buy into it. I was made conscious of the system... Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #70
Thank you for your honest, reasoned response. (not sarcasm) Peace Out. nt clarice Jul 2014 #71
Nye, clarice Jul 2014 #66
Why is the minority.... daleanime Jul 2014 #75
Compared to the rest of the world? absolutely .nt clarice Jul 2014 #78
You don't have a very good understanding of "the rest of the world." Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #89
Also doesn't understand 'fairly'.... daleanime Jul 2014 #102
Didn't ask about the rest of the world.... daleanime Jul 2014 #103
Ooooops...sorry....did I express an independent opinion??? My bad. nt clarice Jul 2014 #105
Bad? Yes..... daleanime Jul 2014 #106
Actually.... clarice Jul 2014 #107
"Derogatory term for women?" daleanime Jul 2014 #108
I try to keep personal attacks to a minimum.... clarice Jul 2014 #109
Like I said... daleanime Jul 2014 #111
I never said that there wasn't income disparity in The US.. clarice Jul 2014 #112
You Are Trying To Take Matter Sideways, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2014 #69
One of the major victories of capitalism is propagandizing the idea......... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #96
Indeed, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2014 #98
It's We the People's money at best, the oligarch's or empire's money at worst, not yours. hunter Jul 2014 #19
Respectfully..... clarice Jul 2014 #22
I have $2.66 in my pocket right now. hunter Jul 2014 #44
I am so sorry to hear of your plight. I have very much "been there" Is there anything that I can do? clarice Jul 2014 #60
We're actually quite well, but thank you. hunter Jul 2014 #77
Curious....have you considered debt resolution or personal bancruptcey?.... clarice Jul 2014 #79
Good God. www.marxists.org leftstreet Jul 2014 #28
Please respect my opinion in not advocating a system.... clarice Jul 2014 #29
You've given no opinion leftstreet Jul 2014 #31
Respectfully, clarice Jul 2014 #32
You are certainly entitled to your 'beliefs' leftstreet Jul 2014 #36
Peace Out. nt clarice Jul 2014 #39
Might one consider Central America quaker bill Jul 2014 #126
Yes you are quite right...... clarice Jul 2014 #128
BS BlindTiresias Jul 2014 #131
Interesting link... clarice Jul 2014 #132
Questionable methodology BlindTiresias Jul 2014 #135
I'm not sure of those figures either...as to the rest...we can respectfully disagree. ... clarice Jul 2014 #136
Which figures? BlindTiresias Jul 2014 #137
sorry, I meant the wikipedia figures. nt clarice Jul 2014 #138
when and where do you start counting? quaker bill Jul 2014 #150
That's funny! BillZBubb Jul 2014 #153
LOL tenderfoot Jul 2014 #63
Love it !!! Using as a screen saver. Thanks. nt clarice Jul 2014 #64
You should use it as your avatar - it fits you too a tee. tenderfoot Jul 2014 #81
Thanks...is it because we are both so cute? nt clarice Jul 2014 #83
Absolutely, in an OBVIOUS TROLLY kind of way! tenderfoot Jul 2014 #86
You are certainly taking liberties with someone whom you don't know. nt clarice Jul 2014 #87
It's what she does. /nt pintobean Jul 2014 #95
Pinto, is she the crazy lady who keeps getting thrown off of DU? nt clarice Jul 2014 #104
No. She did a voluntary start over pintobean Jul 2014 #113
Me too. peace. nt clarice Jul 2014 #114
I think you spotted one! nt BillZBubb Jul 2014 #154
true capitalism requires vigorous competition, which requires oversight and regulation unblock Jul 2014 #13
I like what you describe, but might it be more Deny and Shred Jul 2014 #47
adam smith was anti-monopoly and originally, competition *was* the "invisible hand". unblock Jul 2014 #55
Semantics really. Deny and Shred Jul 2014 #76
It's pretty much designed to. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #17
Yes. Pretty much by definition. truebrit71 Jul 2014 #20
Inevitably? Since I left my stash of infinite universes in my other purse, I can't tell you that. winter is coming Jul 2014 #23
Not inevitably, but usually. HooptieWagon Jul 2014 #24
Are there any systems that do not produce inequalities? (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #26
.... TBF Jul 2014 #52
You should start an OP asking that question leftstreet Jul 2014 #53
probably not. However we have operated under a post world war II assumption that Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #85
Unregulated capitalism? Yep. abelenkpe Jul 2014 #30
Hell Yes! Capitalism Does Inevitably Produce Inequalities. hunter Jul 2014 #35
Yes. Xolodno Jul 2014 #38
Of course it does. n/t PowerToThePeople Jul 2014 #42
That's what it's for! FiveGoodMen Jul 2014 #45
Piketty argues that without explicit policies to address inequality Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #46
Makes sense to me intuitively. nt BootinUp Jul 2014 #57
Of course - the system is designed to reward only TBF Jul 2014 #51
It starts with inequality at its inception and only broadens the gap if Skidmore Jul 2014 #54
which then ironically undermines any circulation, leading to vapor lock nt MisterP Jul 2014 #74
It does the way we do it. DirkGently Jul 2014 #80
Of course it does. Workers who provide ROI have no say in profit distributions, which are ancianita Jul 2014 #82
Inequity is inherent in capitalism due to its system of profit it causes by disadvantaging another ancianita Jul 2014 #84
Every system produces inequalities LittleBlue Jul 2014 #88
Ah, yes, the usual Randian venture capitalist talking points. Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #90
You need to study economics before attempting a serious discussion on this LittleBlue Jul 2014 #93
Which "system" specifically do you think I'm defending? Gravitycollapse Jul 2014 #94
By "study economics", you mean the neo-liberal, Freidmanist bullshit.......... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #121
You mean every Stalinist based communist system....... socialist_n_TN Jul 2014 #124
What system would you say France operates under? Hippo_Tron Jul 2014 #120
I read somewhere YarnAddict Jul 2014 #91
People inevitably produce inequalities Silent3 Jul 2014 #92
The answer is yes-unless corrected by democratic institutions and public services YoungDemCA Jul 2014 #97
Reality and anything in it produces inequality. Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #99
Yes. It's built on inequality. Been saying this for years. *So sue me!* freshwest Jul 2014 #100
Yes, of course BlindTiresias Jul 2014 #101
I think every system eventually corrupts itself Marrah_G Jul 2014 #110
That's like asking if beans inevitably produce farts. rug Jul 2014 #119
It certainly does, although the countries with the least inequality are also capitalist economies. pampango Jul 2014 #123
Yes. jwirr Jul 2014 #125
“The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.” ― Voltaire Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #140
Always, it is founded on inequality, the owners and the owned. nt bemildred Jul 2014 #141
Without massive govt interference, yes! Yavin4 Jul 2014 #142
Absolutely. Ed Suspicious Jul 2014 #145
It does if you don't have any rules to protect the middle and lower class Rex Jul 2014 #155
By definition capitalism creates inequalities. Why is there any question about this? BillZBubb Jul 2014 #156
When left unchecked, as it has been of late, yes. n/t Lady Freedom Returns Jul 2014 #158
Capitalism is by its own admission Shankapotomus Jul 2014 #159
A better question would have been "does capitalism inevitably produce injustice" quaker bill Jul 2014 #160
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Capitalism Inevitabl...»Reply #52