Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Does Capitalism Inevitably Produce Inequalities? [View all]
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/07/02-2
Protesters involved with Occupy San Francisco in October of 2011. (Photo: flickr / cc / Glenn Halog)
In a recent New York Times op-ed article, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz theorized that capitalism does not inevitably produce inequalities in wealth. Instead, he argued, todays inequalities result from policy decisions made by politicians on all sorts of matters that affect peoples income: the tax structure that favors the rich, the bailout of the banks during the Great Recession, subsidies for rich farmers, cutting of food stamps, etc. In fact, he concluded, today there are no truly fundamental laws of capitalism. Thanks to democracy, people can steer the economy in a variety of directions and no single outcome is inevitable.
In their 2010 book, Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, Yale Professor Jacob Hacker and U.C. Berkeley Professor Paul Pierson would seem to add additional support to Stiglitzs conclusion. As reported by Bob Herbert in The New York Times, they argued that the economic struggles of the middle and working classes in the U.S. since the late-1970s were not primarily the result of globalization and technological changes but rather a long series of policy changes in government that overwhelmingly favored the rich.
Although there is certainly significant substance to Stiglitzs argument policy decisions can have profound impacts on economic outcomes nevertheless capitalism is far more responsible for economic inequality because of its inherent nature and its extended reach in the area of policy decisions than Stiglitz is willing to concede.
To begin with, in capitalist society it is much easier to make money if you already have money, and much more difficult if you are poor. So, for example, a rich person can buy up a number of foreclosed houses and rent them out to desperate tenants at ridiculously high rates. Then, each time rent is paid, the landlord becomes richer and the tenant becomes poorer, and inequalities in wealth grow.
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think that any economic system on a scale of the united states will produce inequalities
el_bryanto
Jul 2014
#11
Capital itself is theft. Inequality is not so much the byproduct as the essential product.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2014
#10
Why is that "lousy business practices"? Taking as much money in profit......
socialist_n_TN
Jul 2014
#118
Maybe through collective thought and effort we can erect a system that is good for about 99% of us
nolabels
Jul 2014
#144
If it worked then what has happened to it, where is it and how do we indentfy it?
nolabels
Jul 2014
#149
How about folks who enjoy their jobs and feel that they are fairly compensated?
Nye Bevan
Jul 2014
#34
So when JK Rowling is rewarded with billions of pounds for writing the Harry Potter books,
Nye Bevan
Jul 2014
#56
One of the major victories of capitalism is propagandizing the idea.........
socialist_n_TN
Jul 2014
#96
It's We the People's money at best, the oligarch's or empire's money at worst, not yours.
hunter
Jul 2014
#19
I am so sorry to hear of your plight. I have very much "been there" Is there anything that I can do?
clarice
Jul 2014
#60
I'm not sure of those figures either...as to the rest...we can respectfully disagree. ...
clarice
Jul 2014
#136
true capitalism requires vigorous competition, which requires oversight and regulation
unblock
Jul 2014
#13
adam smith was anti-monopoly and originally, competition *was* the "invisible hand".
unblock
Jul 2014
#55
Inevitably? Since I left my stash of infinite universes in my other purse, I can't tell you that.
winter is coming
Jul 2014
#23
probably not. However we have operated under a post world war II assumption that
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2014
#85
Of course it does. Workers who provide ROI have no say in profit distributions, which are
ancianita
Jul 2014
#82
Inequity is inherent in capitalism due to its system of profit it causes by disadvantaging another
ancianita
Jul 2014
#84
By "study economics", you mean the neo-liberal, Freidmanist bullshit..........
socialist_n_TN
Jul 2014
#121
The answer is yes-unless corrected by democratic institutions and public services
YoungDemCA
Jul 2014
#97
It certainly does, although the countries with the least inequality are also capitalist economies.
pampango
Jul 2014
#123
“The comfort of the rich depends upon an abundant supply of the poor.” ― Voltaire
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2014
#140
By definition capitalism creates inequalities. Why is there any question about this?
BillZBubb
Jul 2014
#156
A better question would have been "does capitalism inevitably produce injustice"
quaker bill
Jul 2014
#160