Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)

7. not every thread in GD is about President Obama, contrary to some people's opinions

Reply to Sheepshank (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 19, 2014, 03:18 PM

Mar 2014

The purpose is stated write in the OP -- to correctly define pharmaceutical formulary, since insurance formulary is incorrectly labeled as pharmaceutical formulary elsewhere.

And what is your purpose in posting here?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hospital Pharmaceutical Formularies differ from Insurance Company Formularies [View all] magical thyme Mar 2014 OP

It's the same concept theboss Mar 2014 #1

not according to Mineral Man. magical thyme Mar 2014 #3

Since you mentioned my thread, here's a link to it: MineralMan Mar 2014 #2

your first sentence says insurance companies use (the pharmaceutical) formularies, magical thyme Mar 2014 #4

As you say. MineralMan Mar 2014 #6

my interest is *informing* people. nt magical thyme Mar 2014 #8

That's a very good interest. That's also MineralMan Mar 2014 #10

so? and? Sheepshank Mar 2014 #5

not every thread in GD is about President Obama, contrary to some people's opinions magical thyme Mar 2014 #7

yes of COURSE it is Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #11

Exactly!!!!! n/t Sheepshank Mar 2014 #14

Heck, nowadays it's becoming increasingly difficult to differentiate hospitals and insurers. Hoyt Mar 2014 #9

I think ACO's put quality and outcomes ahead of costs. magical thyme Mar 2014 #12

Let's hope so. But insurance companies have to pay out 80% in benefits, and they Hoyt Mar 2014 #13

they do now (have to pay out 80%) and that's a definite improvement. magical thyme Mar 2014 #15

I hope you are right, but as I understand it the Vermont plan is not up and running. Hoyt Mar 2014 #16