Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does this really need to be explained on a liberal dem discussion site? yep. [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)207. Perhaps if someone explained WHY CCPI won't go anywhere ...
And WHY the gop can't take up the carrot And, WHY President Obama (and team) have instituted a great strategy on this issue, people will be less outraged ... I'm pretty certain no one has explained it before. Wait! What? ...
Look at the polling, Democrats and the rest of the Left hate them (the gop); but more importantly, (and Ive written this so many times, all I have to do a push control-V) a solid plurality of Independent voters AND republican voters (a solid majority, when taken together) see the gop as the party unwilling to compromise; and therefore, the reason nothing is getting done in Washington.
In order to flip the House (because of gerrymandering) and expand the Senate in 2014, Democrats need this cohort of Independent voters and republican voters to either: vote Democratic (which is unlikely); to vote 3rd-party (which will reduce the gerrymandering effect, as it will dilute the gop vote more so than the Democratic vote); or to stay home.
Enter President Obamas Budget Proposal that included the CCPI to the Left, its Hair On Fire time because NO REAL DEMOCRAT would ever propose cutting entitlement programs; but look at it from the POV of the target cohort they see President Obama (and by extension, Democrats) as willing to move on entitlements IF the gop is willing to move on taxes (i.e., COMPROMISE). (It is only the Left that is viewing CCPI in isolation). And what is the cohort seeing the gop continuing to refuse to compromise (thats what the polling is saying).
Does this strategy risk, disillusioned Democrats sitting home? Well, yes. And some on the Left are, seemingly, doing everything in their power to make that happen, with their constant President Obama is (and by extension, Democrats are) sell-out devil(s) mantras, without pointing out that President Obama is not running for office, AND by not pointing out what Democrats (that ARE/will be running) are actually saying which goes from Pelosis, Well consider CCPI; BUT ONLY IF the gop GIVES on taxes to Markeys (and the majority of the Democratic Caucsus) Hell NO Leave SS and Medicare alone.
While I, personally, think that the Pelosi/President Obama position is the wiser strategy, 18 months out from the election, as it continues to reinforce what the targeted cohort already believes that the gop is unwilling to compromise, Democrats saying Hell NO! signals that SS and Medicare will not/cannot be touched.
So Message to the Hold em accountable Left and waivering Democrats:
Stop saying/promoting President Obamas Budget Proposal as merely CCPI (and a few other anti-Democratic positions) and help the Democratic Partys cause by, at a minimum, stating what the Democrats in Congress are actually saying!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251304468
In order to flip the House (because of gerrymandering) and expand the Senate in 2014, Democrats need this cohort of Independent voters and republican voters to either: vote Democratic (which is unlikely); to vote 3rd-party (which will reduce the gerrymandering effect, as it will dilute the gop vote more so than the Democratic vote); or to stay home.
Enter President Obamas Budget Proposal that included the CCPI to the Left, its Hair On Fire time because NO REAL DEMOCRAT would ever propose cutting entitlement programs; but look at it from the POV of the target cohort they see President Obama (and by extension, Democrats) as willing to move on entitlements IF the gop is willing to move on taxes (i.e., COMPROMISE). (It is only the Left that is viewing CCPI in isolation). And what is the cohort seeing the gop continuing to refuse to compromise (thats what the polling is saying).
Does this strategy risk, disillusioned Democrats sitting home? Well, yes. And some on the Left are, seemingly, doing everything in their power to make that happen, with their constant President Obama is (and by extension, Democrats are) sell-out devil(s) mantras, without pointing out that President Obama is not running for office, AND by not pointing out what Democrats (that ARE/will be running) are actually saying which goes from Pelosis, Well consider CCPI; BUT ONLY IF the gop GIVES on taxes to Markeys (and the majority of the Democratic Caucsus) Hell NO Leave SS and Medicare alone.
While I, personally, think that the Pelosi/President Obama position is the wiser strategy, 18 months out from the election, as it continues to reinforce what the targeted cohort already believes that the gop is unwilling to compromise, Democrats saying Hell NO! signals that SS and Medicare will not/cannot be touched.
So Message to the Hold em accountable Left and waivering Democrats:
Stop saying/promoting President Obamas Budget Proposal as merely CCPI (and a few other anti-Democratic positions) and help the Democratic Partys cause by, at a minimum, stating what the Democrats in Congress are actually saying!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251304468
And ...
Here let me spell it out for you one more, again
Why it hurts republicans
Republicans demand movement on entitlements President Obama places on the table CCPI the left freaks out (showing that President Obama is acting against his base, i.e., willing to compromise) But the offer comes with a demand for more revenue (something that the left ignores during their freak out) republicans are caught in a pickle; if they accept the CCPI along with the increased revenue, they face a primary challenge because they caved on tax increases AND they are hurt with a significant portion of their mid-term base - the elderly. If they vote against the CCPI, they face a primary because they didnt cut entitlements AND they are hurt with those fed-up republicans and independents that want to see governance, if not compromise, by once again proving the obstructionist label, true. The republicans have, once again, refused to take what they asked for.
Now, why it wont hurt Democrats
Listen to what sitting Democratic legislators are actually saying about CCPI Those in safe districts are saying CCPI? Hell no! Those in purplish districts and the Democratic leadership are saying, CCPI? Well, well think about it (against my bases wishes); but only if the republicans will give in on significant revenue. Republicans will not do the level of revenue required for CCPI to be put to a vote in the House or the Senate, nor will they do sufficient revenue for President Obama to sign the thing into law.
So fear not CCPI is going nowhere except to further damage the republican party.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3904206
Maybe folk will listen this time ...
Why it hurts republicans
Republicans demand movement on entitlements President Obama places on the table CCPI the left freaks out (showing that President Obama is acting against his base, i.e., willing to compromise) But the offer comes with a demand for more revenue (something that the left ignores during their freak out) republicans are caught in a pickle; if they accept the CCPI along with the increased revenue, they face a primary challenge because they caved on tax increases AND they are hurt with a significant portion of their mid-term base - the elderly. If they vote against the CCPI, they face a primary because they didnt cut entitlements AND they are hurt with those fed-up republicans and independents that want to see governance, if not compromise, by once again proving the obstructionist label, true. The republicans have, once again, refused to take what they asked for.
Now, why it wont hurt Democrats
Listen to what sitting Democratic legislators are actually saying about CCPI Those in safe districts are saying CCPI? Hell no! Those in purplish districts and the Democratic leadership are saying, CCPI? Well, well think about it (against my bases wishes); but only if the republicans will give in on significant revenue. Republicans will not do the level of revenue required for CCPI to be put to a vote in the House or the Senate, nor will they do sufficient revenue for President Obama to sign the thing into law.
So fear not CCPI is going nowhere except to further damage the republican party.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3904206
Maybe folk will listen this time ...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
316 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does this really need to be explained on a liberal dem discussion site? yep. [View all]
cali
Feb 2014
OP
Horseshit. No one has said Obama has cut SS. Plenty of people have said he has offered it up
Autumn
Feb 2014
#12
My Husband gets his just like clockwork. Never fails, it just shows up like magic.
Autumn
Feb 2014
#134
I bet Cali_Democrat is confusing SSI disability checks with Social Security retirement checks.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#142
But those checks could be stopped if the SSI people decided the disability no longer applied,
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#167
I think it was an honest mistake, since both payments are made by the Social Security administration
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#170
Are you confusing SSI disability payments --which can be stopped if someone's disability improves --
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#141
Obama can't unilaterally increase the COLA adjustment, which was set by Congress.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#238
When they become absurd, I smell desperation. They have no rational arguments so they
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#85
I'm beginning to observe a certain level of irrational thought processeses in play..
2banon
Feb 2014
#272
I didnt get it to mean that SS was dead, but that having a Democratic president offer it up
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#291
And a hearty good morning to yourself. I have no delusion that we will defeat the giant, but
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#303
Do you have a link for that? I'm not aware of any Obama-decreed cuts to Social Security. nt
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#138
There isn't a cut on the list and all the figures are the result of laws passed by Congress.
pnwmom
Feb 2014
#237
You do know he never offered it right? I can't see why the White House says it's off the table now.
Autumn
Feb 2014
#74
no kidding why do u think he did it. it's for that reason, pave the way,make it easier for the
leftyohiolib
Feb 2014
#10
It was annoying when Kucinich would play politics, too. It lends these charlatans
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#18
+10000 Not only that, the threats were used to implement real austerity.
woo me with science
Feb 2014
#19
thank you so much for that post- though of course it will be ignored by the adoring fans
cali
Feb 2014
#21
You clearly misunderstand. Looks like she likes Democrats just fine. But conservatives, not so much.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#83
Conservatives want to privatize Social Security. You call yourself a conservative, does
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#296
If this were the "President's plan"... he wouldn't have withdrawn it
ConservativeDemocrat
Feb 2014
#309
And once again you use insults to try to hide that you are not committing yourself.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#310
Every Democrat, every American, should be sick of the constant Third Way implication
KoKo
Feb 2014
#87
You're kidding yourself if you think this OP and their dwindling fans will stop
Number23
Feb 2014
#293
IMHO, the disconnect comes from President Obama being exactly what he is cali.
fleabiscuit
Feb 2014
#66
Even if he did withdraw the proposal, it should never have been on the table in the first place
eridani
Feb 2014
#219
Social Security is too critical to EVER be used that way by a Democrat, period. n/t
eridani
Feb 2014
#297
You must lack reading comprehension skills. Chained CPI is STILL on the table.
djean111
Feb 2014
#55
No offense, but unless you are actually OBAMA, you are in no position to say definitively
djean111
Feb 2014
#65
it's still on the table. he didn't foreswear future cuts and sign in blood
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#149
And your outrage lands on what others have to say. How easy to never commit oneself.
rhett o rick
Feb 2014
#304
You have a lot of fucking nerve calling someone a liar. Get the fuck over yourself. n/t
ProSense
Feb 2014
#254
Yep. Kinda like being grateful that your spouse didn't poison your coffee after all.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2014
#69
Yep. Kinda like being grateful that your spouse didn't poison your coffee after all.
djean111
Feb 2014
#71
I'm glad the President has decided not to put chained CPI in his budget this year.
stage left
Feb 2014
#73
Right! Now it will always be on the table. The pukes will always be shooting for it. It used to
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2014
#80
thanks for an excellent post…one of the ones that help make sense of
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2014
#202
Once a dem put it on the table, it will be put on the table again until they take the cleaver to it.
CrispyQ
Feb 2014
#122
they couldn't describe any detail while they were having a case of the vapors
Skittles
Feb 2014
#186
LOL, so when Obama does something right we should praise him, but when he does something wrong....
Logical
Feb 2014
#185
+1,000. BHO legitimized hacking away at Social Security and the Safety Net, DEM & GOP alike.
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2014
#177
Now, now Cali, if you aren't grateful the budget doesn't include the misguided and stupid policy
TheKentuckian
Feb 2014
#195
thank you for explaining this. As preposterous as it may seem - some people here genuinely
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2014
#206
Repetition is key. It makes the idea mainstream and makes eventual cuts inevitable.
jsr
Feb 2014
#211
"EXACTLY" The mainstream media and the pundits of the "sensible center" have been pushing
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2014
#213
then he shouldn't have proposed cuts to Social Security benefits in next years budget and
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2014
#222
I would only qualify that by specifying on economic issues the right-wing has achieved total victory
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2014
#229
Thank you. It's unbelievable that anyone would even TRY to 'explain' why he has 'taken it off the
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#241
Are you saying Obama was lying?? Are you stating we should not believe him when he
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#243
Great post from Bvar as usual. I remember the last convoluted chess story re CPI
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#288
And don't forget that before we were presented with the latest explanation as to why
sabrina 1
Feb 2014
#286