Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
47. blue loses after 1968
Tue Dec 10, 2013, 02:37 AM
Dec 2013

because in 1968 the minimum wage was raised to $1.60, the highest point ever, historically. In terms of 2011 dollars, that wage was $10.17 an hour.

But then Nixon was elected. And the minimum wage was NOT increased again until 1974.

In 2011 dollars, it looks like this

1968 - $10.17
1970 - $9.13 (for some reason, I do not have 1969 in my spreadsheet)
1971 - $8.75
1972 - $8.48
1973 - $7.97
1974 - $8.98

The income of the bottom 20% probably depends heavily on the minimum wage. Hence the drop after the peak in 1968.

But I don't think the reference point changes anything substantial. A year has to be picked, and they chose that one. And they did more or less gain equally. If 1947 was 60% for the bottom 20% and for the median and for the 95th percentile and they all generally saw their income grow by 40% up to 1973.

Again, you pick a baseline for inflation and changing that baseline does not change the rates. For example http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

Baseline 1975 = 100

1975 - 100
1980 - 153.16
1985 - 200 (okay that was weird)

inflation rate 1975-1980 = 53.16%
inflation rate 1975-1985 = 100%
inflation rate 1980-1985 = 30.58%

Baseline 1980 = 100
1975 = 65.29
1980 = 100
1985 = 130.58

inflation rate 1975-1980 = 53.16 (100-65.29)/65.29
inflation rate 1975-1985 = 100% (130.58-65.29)/65.29
inflation rate 1980-1985 = 30.58%

baseline 1960 = 100
1975 = 181.76
1980 = 278.38
1985 = 363.51

inflation rate 1975-1980 = 53.16 (278.38-181.76)/181.76

But what do I know. I am not very good at math.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rec. Great Graphic........ Smarmie Doofus Dec 2013 #1
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Wilms Dec 2013 #2
+1. n/t Smarmie Doofus Dec 2013 #4
Been saying that for 30 yrs FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #3
I wonder why they chose 1973 as a starting point and what would happen if they chose a different freedom fighter jh Dec 2013 #5
1974 Housing Bubble FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #7
pre- and post- oil embargo? eShirl Dec 2013 #8
blue loses after 1968 hfojvt Dec 2013 #47
I agree, the true bend point is 1969 Sirveri Dec 2013 #48
it's income though - not wages hfojvt Dec 2013 #51
K & R for the collosal failure & expecting the backlash to turn LEFT in a huge way, can you mother earth Dec 2013 #6
Think how good we would be doing if we were following the pre-Reagan graph right now! Dustlawyer Dec 2013 #9
I remember old Bushy calling it VOODOO economics.... Historic NY Dec 2013 #10
Instead of naming an airport after Reagan, MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #11
Reagan's Debt! ReRe Dec 2013 #12
I think the REAGAN DEBT is better than Reagan's Debt. pangaia Dec 2013 #19
Yes.... ReRe Dec 2013 #32
BTW just to note hootinholler Dec 2013 #40
Sorry I didn't describe it accurately... ReRe Dec 2013 #46
Priceless..... pangaia Dec 2013 #44
Hedrick Smith reminds me of... ReRe Dec 2013 #45
Hey, Rupert Murdoch's billionaire donors paid for that privilege fair and square. Lasher Dec 2013 #13
The idea was not new. Government joined with corporations is fascism. And if the isn't good enough jwirr Dec 2013 #14
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #15
A great successs... Gary 50 Dec 2013 #16
Exact.. sendero Dec 2013 #30
I can't recommend this enough times liberal N proud Dec 2013 #17
Who's Mow? pangaia Dec 2013 #20
Who's... Gary 50 Dec 2013 #21
What's on second. pangaia Dec 2013 #23
Actually started decade before RR econoclast Dec 2013 #18
Your graphic shows the 1% also suffered a decline beginning in ~ 1973 ... Scuba Dec 2013 #24
The decline for the 1% econoclast Dec 2013 #25
What happened in the early '70's was gas prices skyrocketing. What happened in 1982 was Reagan. Scuba Dec 2013 #26
Respectfully disagree econoclast Dec 2013 #41
The Economic Recovery Act of 1981 was an across the board cut. badtoworse Dec 2013 #55
Reaganomics was the beginning of the end for the middle class nt HelenWheels Dec 2013 #22
1981 CountAllVotes Dec 2013 #27
Exactly gopiscrap Dec 2013 #28
K&R Agree. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #29
They lied all the way to the bank. KansDem Dec 2013 #31
IMO, what began happening to our economy around 1980 was inevitable badtoworse Dec 2013 #33
If the international labor market was the only consideration your theory would have more credence. Scuba Dec 2013 #34
Decades of high taxes and massive public spending would have preserved the economy? badtoworse Dec 2013 #35
Yes, a progressive tax system and public investment have benefited the economy .... Scuba Dec 2013 #36
Look at the attached graph from the St Louis Fed badtoworse Dec 2013 #37
Sure he cut taxes...for the top income earners. And then he raised taxes. Again and again and again progressoid Dec 2013 #49
If I recall correctly, income tax rates were cut across the board, not just on the wealthy badtoworse Dec 2013 #52
Yes, the initial cuts were across the board. progressoid Dec 2013 #54
Globalization moondust Dec 2013 #38
Revenue colsohlibgal Dec 2013 #39
All hail to Saint Ronnie, the gipper, whose deification is on the fast track. Glory be to indepat Dec 2013 #42
Yep kentuck Dec 2013 #43
Who Stole The American Dream - Video - Book cantbeserious Dec 2013 #50
I've Been Saying This For More Years Than ChiciB1 Dec 2013 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reaganomics is what happe...»Reply #47