Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
8. I actually thought seizing the phone records for the AP was overkill, but legal
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 07:09 PM
Jul 2013

I said this again and again, but you probably just never paid attention. Arguing that something is legal shouldn't be confused with support. That's the mistake you're making.

The US attorney, Ron Machen, went too far IMO, but he did follow the law. Some people called it illegal which was total rubbish.

Same with Rosen's emails. A warrant was obtained for Rosen's emails. A federal magistrate and a federal judge signed off on the search warrant. Again, totally legal.

A subpoena was used the acquire AP phone records. Again, totally legal and by the book.

There's nothing wrong with the administration changing the way the US attorneys would acquire records in the future, but you want to use this change to bash people.

So predictable...yes you are.

BTW, nice transparency page.

*snicker*

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Holder Tighten...»Reply #8