Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Peter cotton

(380 posts)
37. Previously owned 30 round mags would still be legal,
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 02:14 PM
Mar 2013

although it would not be legal to purchase new ones. Of course, given that there are somewhere in the ballpark of a billion (not an exaggeration) high capacity mags out there already, such a ban would be ineffectual at best.

And in any case, the ban isn't going to pass.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because the gun lovers/NRA folk want to hide it and hope people forget. graham4anything Mar 2013 #1
I haven't used those words, but I can tell you what I mean by similar phrases Recursion Mar 2013 #2
Because gun humpers want to minimize and deflect the issue. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2013 #3
The horrendousness of this act... Bay Boy Mar 2013 #4
"Anomaly"? Yeah - like mass shootings and 26+ more dead people are such rare occurances. jmg257 Mar 2013 #6
Good example here of "emotional hyperbole" Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #9
Sure they are - what's a dozen or so massacres a year. Nothing to get excited about jmg257 Mar 2013 #11
If you are relying on "statistics" marions ghost Mar 2013 #20
Degrees of separation, Mr/s Melon Lord. lapislzi Mar 2013 #21
Remind me of Bay Boy Mar 2013 #39
Because fucking gun lovers will try ANYTHING to make the justifiable desire to have jmg257 Mar 2013 #5
Yahoos in photo below should have been chased out of town. Hoyt Mar 2013 #7
It comes across as... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #8
I think you infer that sentiment, rather than that sentiment being implied. LanternWaste Mar 2013 #15
Personal example... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #18
On the other hand, calling the reference to Newtown hyperbole comes across as “you're exaggerating". AlinPA Mar 2013 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #17
Because, apparently, if I am not a ballistics or weapons expert lapislzi Mar 2013 #10
Only in the sense that if you are going to legislate something.... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #36
It is only hyperbole when victims are used to silence discussion rather than drive it Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #12
It's another form of "mansplaining" things... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #13
'Emotions are neither good nor bad" Bay Boy Mar 2013 #41
The original Star Trek series... ljm2002 Mar 2013 #47
I find your story about the scientist Bay Boy Mar 2013 #49
Very Well Said. (nt) Paladin Mar 2013 #45
Well because we see how people acted after 9/11 - patriot act, Iraq war The Straight Story Mar 2013 #14
The Patriot Act didn't cost me anything. Generation_Why Mar 2013 #23
I can't check a book out of a library without some government agent knowing about it derby378 Mar 2013 #46
The hyperbole involved Crepuscular Mar 2013 #19
Would the AR Lanza used be legal under the new bill? nt jmg257 Mar 2013 #24
I don't believe so, although the functionally equivalent Mini-14 is specifically allowed. Peter cotton Mar 2013 #25
Ok, AR would be illegal. Some Mini-14s would be, but with 10 round mags, not 20 or 30? nt jmg257 Mar 2013 #28
Previously owned 30 round mags would still be legal, Peter cotton Mar 2013 #37
Rifles Crepuscular Mar 2013 #27
I understand the bans didn't/doesn't go far enough. jmg257 Mar 2013 #35
Because it helps our argument and hurts theirs... Generation_Why Mar 2013 #22
At least you are honest about using children as emotional weapons... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #38
Better Than Lanza Using Children As Traget Practice n/t HangOnKids Mar 2013 #43
Using 'emotions' eh? Now where have I heard that before? Kingofalldems Mar 2013 #48
I'm a gun nut, I dare you to tell me to my face Bay Boy Mar 2013 #42
Because only second amendments rights matter malaise Mar 2013 #26
'interpreted' second amendment rights samsingh Mar 2013 #31
Yes - the interpretation of the gun manufacturers and malaise Mar 2013 #32
and those who have been brainwashed samsingh Mar 2013 #50
True malaise Mar 2013 #56
it's because gun lovers don't want to acknowledge anything that could delay their samsingh Mar 2013 #29
Only to the NRA trolls that live on and feed on emotional hyperbole. Rex Mar 2013 #30
Pure projection: the gunners' bizarro attachment to their toys is purely emotional alcibiades_mystery Mar 2013 #33
Very astute HangOnKids Mar 2013 #44
They shouldn't be. Arkana Mar 2013 #34
It's just a method used to distract. CBHagman Mar 2013 #40
Here's my reply to another DU'er on exactly that... Scootaloo Mar 2013 #51
Don't like being called emotional? kudzu22 Mar 2013 #52
Whether one makes proposals to reduce gun violence or not, references made to real shootings are not AlinPA Mar 2013 #55
Because our "RKBA enthusiasts" (see sig line) don't want even the mildest or slightest of apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #53
Who used that term? The whacked psychologists who've put a time-limit on "healthy grieving"? WinkyDink Mar 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Newtown shooting: Why ar...»Reply #37