Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: rand paul filibustering brennan confirmation over drone strikes.... [View all]Leslie Valley
(310 posts)36. You don't really know anything about how our Senate works, do you?
N/T
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
189 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I do. Nowhere in the Constitution is it contemplated that one senator would be able to ...
GodlessBiker
Mar 2013
#12
At least he's doing it the right way, just like Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith goes to Washington.
Pararescue
Mar 2013
#5
I wouldn't mind if he talks for hours. This is what filibustering is all about. Harry Reid should
ReformedGOPer
Mar 2013
#7
And will we see any of the spineless Dems stand up with him to add their voices
BlueStreak
Mar 2013
#41
And all of the Democratic senators you named will vote for cloture and confirmation
onenote
Mar 2013
#110
I'm curious as to what sort of reprisal you think Wyden has to fear from "ruthless" President Obama
onenote
Mar 2013
#150
I don't expect that Obama will do that, but he is setting up a doctrine that ends up there
BlueStreak
Mar 2013
#182
Without due process, how do you know that Fonda wasn't planning an imminent attack?
BlueStreak
Mar 2013
#184
Do you believe that lethal force can never be used against a US citizen on US soil without a trial?
onenote
Mar 2013
#185
Which is why folks like Ron Wyden are satisfied with the administration's position
onenote
Mar 2013
#189
so, how could he vote against "Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013"
spanone
Mar 2013
#37
The problem with both father and son Paul is that they are batshit crazy, racist RWs
malaise
Mar 2013
#113
Look how offensive and juvenile the propaganda is forced to become,
woo me with science
Mar 2013
#96
Oooh, I love the attempts to frame nonsense as a highly intellectual arugment.
ProSense
Mar 2013
#97
Is there anyone in this thread that thinks that Mitt Romney would have a different drone policy?
onenote
Mar 2013
#88
Does anyone think that DU wouldn't be outraged if Romney had been given those powers?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#95
No. I'm saying some DUers are buying into the BS that Paul and Cruz are shoveling out.
onenote
Mar 2013
#180
Paul asked if the same rules used for overseas drone attacks applied in the US.
NOVA_Dem
Mar 2013
#181
911....was congress outraged over the fact that bu$h* was prepared to shoot down flight 93?
spanone
Mar 2013
#100
not really. one man's 'imminent threat' is another man's 'extraordinary circumstance'
spanone
Mar 2013
#118
FFS, look at all the supporters of that racist gay bashing douchebag conservative.
great white snark
Mar 2013
#133
Maybe, instead of "Fuck Rand Paul", they should be saying "Fuck the Constitution". nt
Bonobo
Mar 2013
#159
Certainly the Bill of Rights should mean something re: assassinating Americans with no oversight
BlueStreak
Mar 2013
#172
You don't seem to realize that Wyden said he's satisfied with Holder's explanation
onenote
Mar 2013
#176