Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Qutzupalotl

(15,648 posts)

28. Use the ballroom.

Reply to Polybius (Reply #11)

Sat Dec 20, 2025, 01:03 PM

Saturday

😁

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Democrats must expand the Supreme Court [View all] Fiendish Thingy Friday OP

The reform must be durable. Just adding 4 seats and nothing else is an exerise in futility. Wanderlust988 Saturday #1

We cannot govern out of fear of what republicans might do Fiendish Thingy Saturday #3

Hear, hear Cirsium Saturday #5

You're wanting to govern out of anger. You need to play the long view, not a short term sugar high Wanderlust988 Saturday #8

You are completely wrong Fiendish Thingy Saturday #12

Your first two solutions would require a Constitutional Amendment. SCOTUS Expansion does not. Celerity Saturday #4

This is the way! In It to Win It Saturday #9

I don't see anything explicitly stating lifetime terms tinrobot Saturday #27

Article III states that these judges "hold their office during good behavior," which means they have a lifetime Celerity Saturday #33

While the USSC is being revamped the justices should be split up and required to live and reside in the circuit they are in2herbs Saturday #31

100 justices Cirsium Saturday #6

The building is too small n/t Polybius Saturday #11

There is that Cirsium Saturday #21

Use the ballroom. Qutzupalotl Saturday #28

Not if the justices were required to live and reside in the circuit they have been assigned. in2herbs Saturday #32

I agree. Far more judges and rotate the benches they sit on so they cannot travelingthrulife Saturday #15

"some of the justices are assigned randomly and term limits" Polybius Saturday #10

So what? The Constitution was designed as a living document. We won't survive another court travelingthrulife Saturday #16

Well, a Amendment like that won't pass any time soon for one ITAL Saturday #17

I'm just saying that it's not an easy process Polybius Saturday #34

Gonna have to win several elections. Silent Type Saturday #2

I'm sure you can get bipartisan support to add them right now. hardluck Saturday #7

January 2029 is the time Fiendish Thingy Saturday #13

This actually makes me quite nervous Thunder Chicken Saturday #18

Republicans would have to kill the filibuster to expand the court Fiendish Thingy Saturday #19

Unless the Republicans do it first. Qutzupalotl Saturday #29

We should add 20-30 judges or more. Our population has grown, why not the USSC? travelingthrulife Saturday #14

Can't be an arms race.. RoseTrellis Saturday #20

Overall, I think it's a bad idea Renew Deal Saturday #22

The more the merrier Fiendish Thingy Saturday #24

Jamelle lacks imagination Seeking Serenity Saturday #23

Expanding the court and governing fearlessly will provide that result. Nt Fiendish Thingy Saturday #25

Explain, por favor Seeking Serenity Saturday #26

Impeachment for ignoring the Constitution is an adequate remedy bucolic_frolic Saturday #30

Do you guys have a Supreme Court in Canada? BannonsLiver Saturday #35

Reversing the criminal Citizens United decision is imperative Mysterian Saturday #36