Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: David Brooks, NYT Columnist who scolded Dems for releasing Epstein materials, is in new photos from Epstein estate [View all]intheflow
(29,963 posts)34. So, when I see reports like this,
photos of people with Epstein, I am reminded of the First Amendment's prohibition of guilt by association. These photos are released without dates or context. I mean, in Brooks' case, it probably does indicate guilt, by virtue of his writing the article about how releasing the Epstein files was a mistake and didn't disclose that he himself had known Epstein. But Epstein had a sham philanthropic organization that people could be talking with him about, rr real estate holdings. Or whatever rich people talk to each other about that has nothing to do with sex.
Just sayin'... Trump wants to round us all up in a guilt-by-association-with-antif purge. This makes me wary of when our side lines up to demand the same.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
David Brooks, NYT Columnist who scolded Dems for releasing Epstein materials, is in new photos from Epstein estate [View all]
Miles Archer
Yesterday
OP
We still really know very little on what financial dealings he offered his clients. Was he shielding his clients money
LiberalArkie
Yesterday
#38
Uh, this is David Brooks we are talking about. Nothing innocent about him.
PurgedVoter
13 hrs ago
#100
I wonder how many times he visited "Fantasy Island"...Epstein, Epstein, Epstein...
wcmagumba
Yesterday
#6
That's a karmic full circle that took more than twenty-five year to complete itself.
Baitball Blogger
Yesterday
#10
LOL - his hypocrisy knows NO bounds! Everyone on that list, and I mean EVERYONE, needs to be held accountable
PatrickforB
Yesterday
#18
Gotta figure Trump has been using what he knows about Epstein's friends & 'clients' to blackmail a lot of rich guys
Attilatheblond
Yesterday
#61
lindsey graham went from mccain's wing man to trump toady over 18 holes of golf
rampartd
9 hrs ago
#108
No way in hell was Brooks looking for libidinous pleasures. It's not in his DNA. He's
allegorical oracle
Yesterday
#30
Yep -- hang him for hypocrisy because he's probably guilty. And I've never been a fan of
allegorical oracle
Yesterday
#65
I personally have Jewish friends who for all-the-world would sound waspish. Brooks
allegorical oracle
Yesterday
#63
Brooks converted to Christianity during his mid-life crisis involving second wife
wishstar
Yesterday
#81
How many in the media, congress, courts, corporations, banks are in the Epstein files?
Irish_Dem
Yesterday
#32
True, but when Brooks writes a column criticizing Democrats for "obsessing" over Epstein
tanyev
13 hrs ago
#102
I'm just saying when he wrote that column he should have mentioned that he attended events where Epstein was present.
tanyev
12 hrs ago
#106
Yesterday Steve Schmidt mentioned what Marcus Aurelius had to say about the wisdom of keeping your big mouth shut.
flashman13
Yesterday
#69
Not surprised. Brooks has always seemed to be hiding something. A bit too right wing and phonily moral.
Martin68
Yesterday
#88
Conspiracy theories are starting to look like our reality. #EpsteinFiles #davidbrooks
Buttoneer
23 hrs ago
#91
Sometimes, it's best to just keep quiet, but fear sometimes makes us run our mouths.
Joinfortmill
13 hrs ago
#101