Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Deceitful AI Videos Mislead Seniors on Important Health Issues [View all]
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medical-health-and-nutrition-pseudoscience-technology/deceitful-ai-videos-mislead-seniors-important-health-issuesDeceitful AI Videos Mislead Seniors on Important Health Issues
The script, visuals, and voiceover narration are generated by AI, and so are the fake studies brought up as evidence.
Jonathan Jarry M.Sc. | 11 Dec 2025
-snip-
It was after delivering a lecture to the McGill Community for Lifelong Learning, made up of senior citizens with a thirst for knowledge, that I was asked about Senior Secrets.
Every few days, the YouTube channel with 321,000 subscribers posts a new video with science-backed health tips, surprising remedies, and powerful longevity secrets that most people over 60 have never been told. The channels icon is a cartoonish grandpa with a finger on his smiling lips, swearing you to secrecy, and the thumbnails advertising each video are emblazoned with red and yellow banners, like crime scene tape. Goodbye old age! screams the latest. Never take this after 65!; Just 1 cup before bed repairs your eyes overnight; 99% of seniors dont know: huge mistake. One of the channels trademarks is opening a video title with Over 60?.
-snip-
I picked four such channels and checked every scientific reference their most popular videos listed to see if they existed. Out of 65 references, five were real. I was unable to find the 60 others. As with the Copenhagen non-study, the journals, volumes, and issues were usually dead-on: the AI is simply inserting fake papers into real pages. Occasionally, a journal was made up. Often, the only authors listed were departments or institutes (like Mayo Clinic Center for Aging or British Columbia University Exercise Science Department), which is highly unusual and should serve as a red flag. People write papers, not departments.
-snip-
What we are witnessing with channels like Senior Secrets is the work of content farms, likely based in Vietnam. Sitting in front of dozens of computers are people with no formal training in science or medicine who write prompts for generative AI platforms like ChatGPT and Gemini. The AI creates scripts, animations, thumbnails, voiceover narration, fake scientific papers; and these made-up elements are mashed together in a video that gets uploaded to YouTube.
-snip-
The script, visuals, and voiceover narration are generated by AI, and so are the fake studies brought up as evidence.
Jonathan Jarry M.Sc. | 11 Dec 2025
-snip-
It was after delivering a lecture to the McGill Community for Lifelong Learning, made up of senior citizens with a thirst for knowledge, that I was asked about Senior Secrets.
Every few days, the YouTube channel with 321,000 subscribers posts a new video with science-backed health tips, surprising remedies, and powerful longevity secrets that most people over 60 have never been told. The channels icon is a cartoonish grandpa with a finger on his smiling lips, swearing you to secrecy, and the thumbnails advertising each video are emblazoned with red and yellow banners, like crime scene tape. Goodbye old age! screams the latest. Never take this after 65!; Just 1 cup before bed repairs your eyes overnight; 99% of seniors dont know: huge mistake. One of the channels trademarks is opening a video title with Over 60?.
-snip-
I picked four such channels and checked every scientific reference their most popular videos listed to see if they existed. Out of 65 references, five were real. I was unable to find the 60 others. As with the Copenhagen non-study, the journals, volumes, and issues were usually dead-on: the AI is simply inserting fake papers into real pages. Occasionally, a journal was made up. Often, the only authors listed were departments or institutes (like Mayo Clinic Center for Aging or British Columbia University Exercise Science Department), which is highly unusual and should serve as a red flag. People write papers, not departments.
-snip-
What we are witnessing with channels like Senior Secrets is the work of content farms, likely based in Vietnam. Sitting in front of dozens of computers are people with no formal training in science or medicine who write prompts for generative AI platforms like ChatGPT and Gemini. The AI creates scripts, animations, thumbnails, voiceover narration, fake scientific papers; and these made-up elements are mashed together in a video that gets uploaded to YouTube.
-snip-
Much, much more at the link. All of it horrifying.
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've been a internet user since the early 80s, a web and content developer since. It's hard to deal with.
erronis
Saturday
#8
Video scams of this type aren't even possible without genAI, especially at scale.
highplainsdem
Sunday
#12
Yep. Reference librarians were among the first people to have valuable time wasted by chatbots. See
highplainsdem
Sunday
#16