Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legeally Speaking, hasn't...»Reply #1
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Legeally Speaking, hasn't the Jan 6th Pipe Bomber already been pardoned? [View all]

Walleye

(43,516 posts)
1. So he didn't really have to pardon all of those people separately
Reply to Chasstev365 (Original post)
Sat Dec 6, 2025, 06:33 AM
Yesterday

He just waved his hand like royalty and said “I forgive the right readily“

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EmileShipwackKS ToronadoChasstev365calimaryGiqueCee
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Legeally Speaking, hasn't the Jan 6th Pipe Bomber already been pardoned? [View all] Chasstev365 Yesterday OP
So he didn't really have to pardon all of those people separately Walleye Yesterday #1
this is sometimes warranted . carter pardoned the "draft dodgers" rampartd Yesterday #5
Carters draft dodger pardon was not "a complete and uncondtional pardon to all individuals" ToxMarz Yesterday #9
just the only time i've seen pardons or multiple unnamed people rampartd Yesterday #15
He will probably walk away unpunished. Emile Yesterday #2
Which might be ok, if it wasn't him... nt Shipwack Yesterday #3
I think he has already admitted that he did it. Emile Yesterday #4
Admitting that he did it AND that he did it in response to the "stolen election," probably gets him off the hook. 3Hotdogs Yesterday #11
Not if the pipe bombs were placed on Jan. 5. bluedigger Yesterday #6
Good point but this could be "related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021" ToxMarz Yesterday #8
The January 6th part is unambiguous. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #13
Yes, related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. ToxMarz Yesterday #14
It literally does. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #16
What it actually literally says is ToxMarz Yesterday #17
IMHO, "related to events" eliminates any date restriction debsy Yesterday #7
Yes, this pardon was to cover the politicians Johonny Yesterday #19
Has his picture ever been published? KS Toronado Yesterday #10
The pipe bombs were planted on January 5th... W_HAMILTON Yesterday #12
There is no way his lawyers wont inquire Johonny Yesterday #18
I'd be surprised if Trump and the mob want "planting bombs" to count as "related to our peaceful demo ... muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #20
the language was drafted intentionally broad. harumph Yesterday #21
I doubt that Presidential Proclamation covered future cases. Make7 20 hrs ago #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legeally Speaking, hasn't...»Reply #1
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.