Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GCG

(13 posts)
31. Interesting.
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 01:07 PM
Yesterday

"One popular route has the smugglers heading to Trinidad and Tobago, a short, 7-mile boat ride from the Venezuelan coast, according to the officials and experts."

Could the government of Trinidad and Tobago be involved with the cartels? From past experience we know that certain elements of the Mexican and Columbian governments were or still are involved with the cartels!

I'm going to bet they send more then one boat out at a time...and while the US Navy concentrates on the boats taking a certain route...the other boats are getting to their drop off points and offloading the cargo.

Of course without any solid evidence because it keeps getting destroyed, the US Navy is nothing more then a test to see if other American military services can be just as easily manipulated to open fire on American civilians...which is a possibility!!!









Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The murdered Clouds Passing Yesterday #1
I often wonder how Cotton wasn't shot by his own troops. sinkingfeeling Yesterday #2
Probably because he's all things to anyone he can impress haele Yesterday #4
Like most of the men still in the Republican party Tom Cotton is an obnoxious, ugly son of a bitch Walleye Yesterday #3
I'm betting some of them are on the Epstein list KS Toronado Yesterday #14
Naw...not Tom. He would've turned away at the door. allegorical oracle Yesterday #26
I watched Nicolle Wallace this week, gab13by13 Yesterday #5
extra judicial murder was the stock and trade thomski64 Yesterday #12
I watched the expression on the Admiral's face as he entered the building to testify. colorado_ufo Yesterday #17
I don't know about shame, but I definitely saw guilt ... my first thought when I viewed that clip, he's going to KPN Yesterday #21
Frankly, he knew he fucked up hanging with his ideological buddies. haele Yesterday #34
Krasnov The Wizard Yesterday #30
I was surprised about Bradley. Katinfl Yesterday #6
Dont understand lrucks1952 Yesterday #7
Tom Cotton is a psychopath. Ray Bruns Yesterday #8
We can call Tom Cotton anything we damn well please Jilly_in_VA Yesterday #9
He is consistent: if a Republican does it, it's ok. If a Democrat does the same thing, it's wrong. surfered Yesterday #11
Tom Cotton is a moronic Trump fluffer. sop Yesterday #10
I'll do it LilElf70 Yesterday #13
Did a www search on how most illegal drugs enter the U.S. a few days back KS Toronado Yesterday #15
Here is a link that claims that the drug boats from Venezuela gab13by13 Yesterday #19
Interesting. GCG Yesterday #31
thanks and posting on BS vapor2 Yesterday #32
He's not a moron or an idiot, he's an asshole. He knows full well that was a war crime, he's just spinning it to stay in Fil1957 Yesterday #16
Sorry, why can't we call him those things? otherwise, I agree LymphocyteLover Yesterday #18
Because Fil is right DFW Yesterday #24
Sure, but what's the harm in mocking him? Nothing else we say will make a difference. LymphocyteLover Yesterday #33
We can mock him all night long DFW Yesterday #35
gab13by13 - If you don't mind me borrowing your last paragraph: flashman13 Yesterday #20
I encourage it. gab13by13 Yesterday #29
You can call him a moron, if you like, but I won't give him that excuse. quaint Yesterday #22
No doubt, Tom Cotton is an idiot, and a callous, racist one to boot. patphil Yesterday #23
Reminder angrychair Yesterday #25
But he does a great Norman Bates impression. Sneederbunk Yesterday #27
prevaricating dissembler The Wizard Yesterday #28
Hear Hear! OldBaldy1701E 11 hrs ago #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Can't We Call People ...»Reply #31