Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Medicare's new AI experiment sparks alarm among doctors, lawmakers [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,049 posts)34. And just now would you know "none of those were life threatening'
Since I didn't provide details. I'm fact, the one which took 8 months to resolve was limb threatening. Fortunately, because there was no front-and gate-keeping, the battle took place after the surgery had already saved my right arm.
Which is the point. The promise of Medicare is that I don't have to put up with front-end gate-keeping that might impose delays that put my health at risk. Certainly it is unconscionable to insert a glitchy AI decider with a profit motive/bias to deny claims.
And yes, I live in Ohio, and I resent being a subject of this experiment which puts my access to health care at risk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Any use of AI in a customer service context is to be feared. "Speak to a representative" is my answer to what I want to
Martin68
Thursday
#7
Could you please elaborate for those of us who are not inclined to readily click links?
mahina
Thursday
#13
Wow! Thanks Nigrum Cattus! That's a great source for fighting insurance denials!
BComplex
Thursday
#16
They will likely never hear about it, or understand it was REPUBLICANS who passed this
BComplex
Thursday
#17
Medicare has used private contractors to review claims since at least 1980. The pilot program is limited to 6 states
Silent Type
Thursday
#18
Requiring conservative therapy is a Medicare Advantage/Insurance concept - it has no place in Standard Medicare
Ms. Toad
Thursday
#21
Absolutly incorrect. Original Medicare has extensive coverage policies. No, the patient won't pay because it'll be
Silent Type
Thursday
#22
How many of those services have anything to do with diagnosing or managing cancer? Plus,
Silent Type
Thursday
#26
There is a new policy on skin substitutes that removes the incentive for doctors making thousands of dollars off
Silent Type
Friday
#29
None of those are life threatening conditions. Let's be honest here. No it's not fantasy that it will happen quickly
Silent Type
Friday
#33
Because I can read. None of those are life threatening and most are questionable efficacy. Have no problem telling
Silent Type
Saturday
#35
Talking about list of procedures requiring authorization. None of those are life threatening.
Silent Type
Saturday
#37
Except, of course the denial of a skin graft, which delays surgery for an aggressive cancer -
Ms. Toad
Saturday
#38
If you read the procedures listed, it's for BIOENGINEERED skin substitutes, not skin grafts following cancer surgery.
Silent Type
Saturday
#39