Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,047 posts)
31. Nonsense.
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 01:13 AM
Yesterday
And even if it were denied pending additional info, your doc will send in supporting documentation, measurements, skin product, many send photos of wounds especially for exceptionally long treatment. It will be approved within hours.


The point is that ANY delay is life-threatening. And it is kind of impossible to send photos of a wound that does not yet exist. The point is that the surgery would be delayed until approval for all components - including the graft - are obtained.

And the suggestion that approval would be granted within hours is pure fantasy. I've successfully appealed dozens of denials. (I've only lost one, which I ultimately decided wasn't the worth the continued fight.) Not a single one was granted within hours (even if you don't count the days or more it took to notify me of the denial). The longest took 8 months and over 200 hours of my time. The shortest, I believe, took approximately 3 weeks.

The tinkering with the codes to minimize damage should take place before any pre-authorization for medical care (other than treatment which doubles as cosmetic care) is imposed, not after it is implemented - and the damage has already been done. Anyone implementing a new computer system knows you run parallel systems until the bugs are worked out - you don't implement an untested program in mission critical situations. And medical care is about as mission-critical as it can get. The same standards should apply.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick dalton99a Thursday #1
They get paid to avoid providing care Bettie Thursday #2
Isn't it, though! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Thursday #5
Traditional WmChris Thursday #3
Kicking with DISGUST!!!! Faux pas Thursday #4
One Goal Is Likely To Deny Coverage For Diabetes 2 And Its Related... ColoringFool Thursday #6
Jeezus. Joinfortmill Thursday #8
Any use of AI in a customer service context is to be feared. "Speak to a representative" is my answer to what I want to Martin68 Thursday #7
AI learns that there's a reward for denying coverage. SergeStorms Thursday #12
AI finds it more cost efficient to let us die faster IronLionZion Thursday #19
there is help for patients Nigrum Cattus Thursday #9
Could you please elaborate for those of us who are not inclined to readily click links? mahina Thursday #13
Wow! Thanks Nigrum Cattus! That's a great source for fighting insurance denials! BComplex Thursday #16
The problem isn't the availability of an appeal - Ms. Toad Thursday #20
Arizona is a swing state with lots of retirees IronLionZion Thursday #10
They will likely never hear about it, or understand it was REPUBLICANS who passed this BComplex Thursday #17
If they are looking for fraud and corruption instead popsdenver Thursday #11
They want us dead orangecrush Thursday #14
Who in the F*** authorized this change?? BComplex Thursday #15
Medicare has used private contractors to review claims since at least 1980. The pilot program is limited to 6 states Silent Type Thursday #18
Requiring conservative therapy is a Medicare Advantage/Insurance concept - it has no place in Standard Medicare Ms. Toad Thursday #21
Absolutly incorrect. Original Medicare has extensive coverage policies. No, the patient won't pay because it'll be Silent Type Thursday #22
Gotcha. You believe it is appropriate to force me to choose between Ms. Toad Thursday #25
How many of those services have anything to do with diagnosing or managing cancer? Plus, Silent Type Thursday #26
It was in my post - a skin graft. Ms. Toad Thursday #28
There is a new policy on skin substitutes that removes the incentive for doctors making thousands of dollars off Silent Type Yesterday #29
Nonsense. Ms. Toad Yesterday #31
None of those are life threatening conditions. Let's be honest here. No it's not fantasy that it will happen quickly Silent Type Yesterday #33
And just now would you know "none of those were life threatening' Ms. Toad Yesterday #34
Because I can read. None of those are life threatening and most are questionable efficacy. Have no problem telling Silent Type 5 hrs ago #35
Sorry, but you don't know what those dozens of appeals related to, Ms. Toad 5 hrs ago #36
Talking about list of procedures requiring authorization. None of those are life threatening. Silent Type 5 hrs ago #37
Except, of course the denial of a skin graft, which delays surgery for an aggressive cancer - Ms. Toad 4 hrs ago #38
If you read the procedures listed, it's for BIOENGINEERED skin substitutes, not skin grafts following cancer surgery. Silent Type 4 hrs ago #39
Trump's government... LudwigPastorius Thursday #23
It's bad enough when some employee at an insurance company who is not a doctor IcyPeas Thursday #24
I love the name - WISeR. It's become a cliche to say that every pronouncement by this administration is Orwellian jls4561 Thursday #27
Crap UTUSN Yesterday #30
who needs a "death panel?" rampartd Yesterday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Medicare's new AI experim...»Reply #31