Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(2,498 posts)
8. There is way, way too much porn on the internet, esp. when you also consider how many
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 12:32 AM
Thursday

large homes/estates the guy had, in multiple places. Which means a human would have to memorize a LOT of possible backdrops. Plus there's the timing factor. You'd have a photo taken at some random point in time, and the supposed video taken at potentially another. In many rooms stuff may have happened in, the decor could have changed, etc, which could make recognition difficult.

All of this is a long way of saying there's virtually 0 chance anyone stumbles on a pron vid taken at an Epstein dwelling AND recognizes the backdrop as 'Epstein's Place'.

AI, however, could run a check like this. Though it would take a LONG time to chug through all the content there is and the resource use would be really high.

Without some victim claiming they knew they were filmed having sex and where and when it was, and that elements of the backdrop would not have changed in the interim (such as it happened on a patio with a backdrop of other buildings or a golf course or similar), what you are talking about is a needle in a haystack.

I'd also add that prior to 2006 (Epstein's known days of debauchery) before the advent of very cheap video gear, a lot fewer people were video'ing ... anything, esp. not in high-resolution quality. You won't find videos on pronhub that are done in 4:3 aspect and 480i for example.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There may be somethings m...»Reply #8