Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

womanofthehills

(10,670 posts)
13. Definitely no
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:09 PM
Wednesday

Lots of info on AI. I have found so much info I never see on the web.

I have 2 friends who had breast implants removed because of “breast implant illness” - tens of thousands in Facebook “breast implant group. “

I find out on AI in the late 80’s /90’s 400,000 women sued Dow Chemical for $4 billion dollars for breast implant illness.Over $100 million were compensated I NEVER ever knew of this!!

That’s something that was kept quiet so they could put in implants again and ruin women’s health. The evil part is -Dow contributed to the new studies saying - all’s well - we made new studies so you can’t take us to court again.

My grandaughter is on methadone- it’s messing with the veins in her legs. Drs have NO clue. AI tells me the methadone creates histamine which can mess with her small veins. Why did no doctor know this???

So much info on AI!! Never take first answer as good - question deeper and disagree with AI to find info deeper into the web. You can’t take ask AI for references - so why is that different from any other search.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not alerted - but somehow clearly identified - maybe with a color identifier as with videos, etc? NewHendoLib Wednesday #1
changed my vote from yes... ret5hd Wednesday #6
I agree, identification is better than alerting synni Yesterday #31
Based on WHAT?? It is in no way a violation of site rules. Jack Valentino Wednesday #2
But it should be. paleotn Wednesday #4
NO. Jack Valentino Wednesday #5
That's it! Just so no to fakes. paleotn Wednesday #7
It's unreliable. One expert after another has said that chatbots are built in such a way that they tell you what you eppur_se_muova Thursday #18
Alerted on for what? Renew Deal Wednesday #3
Why not? 3825-87867 Wednesday #8
I think a better question is whether AI posts should be a violation of the TOS. Scrivener7 Wednesday #9
I voted yes, but agree with u berniesandersmittens Wednesday #10
Yes, definitely. Scrivener7 Wednesday #11
Its a context thing. Eventually the AI bubble will burst but... FascismIsDeath Wednesday #12
Definitely no womanofthehills Wednesday #13
That information can be found easily via Google or other search engines and does NOT require highplainsdem Yesterday #32
Is the 3rd option written by AI? Kaleva Wednesday #14
LOL mr715 Wednesday #16
Thank you for picking up on that ! :D At first, I tried to write an AI-sounding post which I thought would capture ... eppur_se_muova Thursday #19
I don't know to be honest Niagara Wednesday #15
How does anyone feel comfortable posting AI slop under their own name? hunter Wednesday #17
Labelled KentuckyWoman Thursday #20
Isn't that like asking whether YouTube videos or links to Twitter posts should be a violation of the terms of service? meadowlander Thursday #21
Actually yes, theoretically no? jfz9580m Thursday #22
This is a confusing question jfz9580m Thursday #23
We need to push back against AI, but with a caveat... carpetbagger Yesterday #24
One issue i see is people spamming the board with some slop video with no context in the body fujiyamasan Yesterday #25
I think it's EarlG's call canetoad Yesterday #26
If the AI-created content violates the TOS - yes. Ms. Toad Yesterday #27
Well, I'm open to it, but it should be clearly clarified as being modified, etc. Just like photographs, videos, etc. SWBTATTReg Yesterday #28
I'm up for it. usonian Yesterday #29
Based on my own selfish entertainment, I'd say "no" simply because flvegan Yesterday #30
Important to check what is correct whether from humans, AI, or a million typing monkeys. RoeVWade Yesterday #33
Wouldn't it be better to campaign for alerting on false information before AI content? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should AI-created content...»Reply #13