Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,898 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 10:35 AM Jan 2012

Fact check: Gingrich's faulty food-stamp claim (Under-Obama 444,574--Under-Bush 14.7 MILLION) [View all]

Fact check: Gingrich's faulty food-stamp claim

But Gingrich goes too far to say Obama has put more on the rolls than other presidents. We asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition service for month-by-month figures going back to January 2001. And they show that under President George W. Bush the number of recipients rose by nearly 14.7 million. Nothing before comes close to that.

And under Obama, the increase so far has been 14.2 million. To be exact, the program has so far grown by 444,574 fewer recipients during Obama's time in office than during Bush's

...............

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-01-18/fact-check-gingrich-obama-food-stamps/52645882/1



and:

Who gets food stamps?

•47% of beneficiaries were children under age 18.

•8% were age 60 or older.

•41% lived in a household with earnings from a job — the so-called "working poor."

•The average household received a monthly benefit of $287.

•36% were white (non-Hispanic), 22% were African American (non-Hispanic) and 10% were Hispanic.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-01-18/fact-check-gingrich-obama-food-stamps/52645882/1



Newt spends more at Tiffany's then these people will see in their lifetimes!
(not sure if that is the truth or not, but HEY, who cares..., kpete)



28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hah! BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #1
If 68% of recipients were white, black and Hispanic, woolldog Jan 2012 #10
Maybe BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #13
That doesnt make sense woolldog Jan 2012 #19
By themselves, maybe, but combined? BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #20
No it doesn't woolldog Jan 2012 #25
Probably most of them didn't want to answer the question. A Simple Game Jan 2012 #27
Native Americans? Lochloosa Jan 2012 #28
This is classic Newt demagoguery Guy Montag Jan 2012 #2
It worked in South Carolina with the tea party gop kemah Jan 2012 #18
Good post Guy Montag Jan 2012 #23
I heard excepts from both Newt and Mitt's speeches this a.m. KansDem Jan 2012 #3
Bumper crop?! BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #14
The GOP feeds on and propels the frenzy of people worried about somoen getting something for nothing liberal N proud Jan 2012 #4
Bush is like Voldemort for the Republican candidates PA Democrat Jan 2012 #5
Oh believe you me BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #15
444,574 fewer Nictuku Jan 2012 #6
correct, nictuku SCantiGOP Jan 2012 #7
Are you comparing the same time periods? former9thward Jan 2012 #8
I Agree lacrew Jan 2012 #9
Yes, but let's not forget Clinton's 3.9% BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #17
In a Sound Bite World, this is not a 'Fact Check' which has legs lacrew Jan 2012 #26
k&r...there seems to be little room for truth in any of nutes claims spanone Jan 2012 #11
I just heard Gingrich say that most food stamp receipients are Black. He wouldn't lie, would he? JPZenger Jan 2012 #12
who profits from food stamps? kemah Jan 2012 #16
food stamps come under the US Dept of Ag SCantiGOP Jan 2012 #22
I would LOVE to see Gingrich slapped upside the snout with this CakeGrrl Jan 2012 #21
Does an obviously misleading OP title really help things? onenote Jan 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fact check: Gingrich's fa...