Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Clouds Passing

(3,418 posts)

8. I figured you were saying that rhetorically.

Reply to Clouds Passing (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 28, 2025, 06:15 PM

Tuesday

But I’ve heard that term frequently lately and it gets under my skin. It’s like saying a large chunk of life is junk.

I do agree with you that the current leadership is cutting aid programs to get rid of the vulnerable, which they consider junk humans.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe we're seeing the start of a passive eugenics program. [View all] Gaugamela Tuesday OP

No DNA is junk. All DNA has specific purpose. We just haven't figured what the "junk" DNAs purpose is. Clouds Passing Tuesday #1

Neither in the scientific or moral sense. Gaugamela Tuesday #4

I figured you were saying that rhetorically. Clouds Passing Tuesday #8

Sadly true. JohnnyLib2 Tuesday #2

It's basically the old-time hee-haw Economic Calvinism... keep_left Tuesday #3

We should stop giving a shit what Musk, Thiel, and Trump think. Initech Tuesday #5

The point is to call it for what it is. The word Gaugamela Tuesday #7

There Is Nothing "Passive" About This Rendville Tuesday #6

Agreed, but if i didn't point out the difference Gaugamela Tuesday #9

Yes, they want people to die. poli-junkie Tuesday #10

The Nazi's loved eugenics and used it extensively to "qualify" who was of "good" aryan stock or not..Like Jews...uff mitch96 Tuesday #11