General Discussion

Autumn

(47,173 posts)

83. This is what Democrats aren't understanding. They think that the republican electorate

Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:26 AM

Jan 28

will step away from Trump. They won't , right now they are enjoying trumps revenge porn. Not untill it's too late. Trump has the house and senate Republicans and the complete media backing him, he doesn't need the people. This is what every fucking person in power on the right has had wet dreams about for years. They are not going to give this up.

Democrats sitting back, taking the high road, ignoring the carnage and focusing on the economey is what will fucking end us.

And yeah I will go to my grave pissed off at Jefferies god is on the throne bullshit.
Deal with it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

17 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Scrivener7 ForgoTheConsequence Emile OneGrassRoot vanessa_ca DLevine durablend Think. Again.republianmushroom Mariana NewHendoLib kcoates KayossZero Crunchy Frog Violet_Crumble RandiFan1290 J-9

270 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I thought we supported democrats here [View all] SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 OP

Is it an attack to critique a public figure's public work? WhiskeyGrinder Jan 28 #1

Having a temper tantrum because SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #5

I think people would be upset if elected Dems were having temper tantrums. Think. Again. Jan 28 #8

Then what is the problem? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #26

I would have to see the specific posts you're complaining about... Think. Again. Jan 28 #32

I was asking about your post above SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #42

That post says not throwing tantrums isn't a problem. Think. Again. Jan 28 #51

Then what is the problem? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #52

Did I say there was a problem? Think. Again. Jan 28 #57

You said SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #69

I think that not throwing tantrums is not the problem. Think. Again. Jan 28 #74

The what do you think is 'the problem'? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #86

Control of government is temporary. DV1 Jan 28 #122

The problem is choie Jan 29 #244

Then what strategy do you recommend? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #246

I'm not a politician choie Jan 29 #248

Exactly how are they not prepared? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #249

Lack of a tactical response is not being prepared. choie Jan 29 #250

What do you consider a tactical response? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #251

What does a temper tantrum look like in this context? WhiskeyGrinder Jan 28 #10

Like this... LexVegas Jan 28 #12

Well done. Think. Again. Jan 28 #33

Any thing with blanket attacks SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #43

Like most generalizations, that blanket doesn't cover the bed. sop Jan 28 #67

i think it's important to criticize ourselves and learn samsingh Jan 28 #113

Ding Ding Ding dwayneb Jan 29 #235

To my knowledge DeepWinter Jan 28 #2

I would welcome constructive criticism SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #6

You say you want specifics angrychair Jan 28 #156

Why not? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #165

True angrychair Jan 28 #190

Yes SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #192

Step aside if they are not willing or able to do the job dalton99a Jan 28 #3

How are you defining their job? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #7

This is what Democrats aren't understanding. They think that the republican electorate Autumn Jan 28 #83

I didn't like Jefferies post either SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #85

The Democrats are playing a wait and see game. They're going to tune out the Autumn Jan 28 #99

Exactly what can be done to effectively fight? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #100

Take a cue from AOC, Jasmine Crockett, Jamie Raskin for starters. Autumn Jan 28 #102

All three are in the House, not the Senate SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #121

No they can't vote for them but they sure are exposing them. Autumn Jan 28 #123

Great SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #125

One last response to you, then I have things to do. The road to fascism is lined Autumn Jan 28 #126

Not what I said SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #130

And yet you propose none. nt Bobstandard Jan 28 #153

Neither are those SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #158

⬆️⬆️⬆️THIS⬆️⬆️⬆️ Think. Again. Jan 28 #137

And yeah I will go to my grave pissed off at Jefferies god is on the throne bullshit. 2naSalit Jan 28 #96

Do you depend on SNAP to eat? choie Jan 29 #252

What exactly do they need to do to fight? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #253

So, we just fire them and replace them with what??? LeftInTX Jan 28 #46

Yes we must be reminded that God is on His Throne and all will be well. Amen. Irish_Dem Jan 28 #4

Trust the Lord. He works in inscrutable ways dalton99a Jan 28 #9

Yes, god is on his throne and we should shut the fuck up Autumn Jan 28 #41

Are you suggesting we should not hold our representatives accountable? Think. Again. Jan 28 #11

Quite a lot of us don't have Democrats as our representatives maxrandb Jan 28 #15

I believe the OP is referring to Dem Representatives. Think. Again. Jan 28 #27

Bugging the crap out of the locals is key, imo. This a.m., the political ice just allegorical oracle Jan 28 #64

I am making so many calls to Retrumplican "leaders" maxrandb Jan 28 #75

What a concept! mcar Jan 28 #169

No SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #17

No...see...we shouldn't ask; "where the fuck are the Republicans"? maxrandb Jan 28 #13

One week into the mad man's 2nd admin and some are demanding Dem leaders do something... brush Jan 28 #18

Exactly what can they do? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #20

Not voting for bullshit would be one thing they could do. There should not be one Democratic vote for any of this. Gore1FL Jan 28 #78

OK SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #92

Let's start with putting dog killers in charge of DHS: Gore1FL Jan 28 #103

Thank you SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #110

And if those Senators all voted against Noem, it would have changed nothing Wiz Imp Jan 28 #116

One change would be my respect for the senators listed wouldn't be diminished. nt Gore1FL Jan 28 #117

That is fine. Criticize them for their votes if you don't agree with them. Wiz Imp Jan 28 #134

I live in Missouri and voted for Harris despite MO not going blue. Gore1FL Jan 28 #138

I would criticize you for voting for Trump. Wiz Imp Jan 28 #139

We are going to have to live with this disagreement, then. Gore1FL Jan 28 #142

Are you saying voting for Noem is constructive and productive? Emile Jan 28 #118

Nice strawman there. You know I wasn't saying that. Wiz Imp Jan 28 #129

No strawman asking you a question. Your Emile Jan 28 #140

You have an error in logic. Saying voting against a nominee is not constructive does not mean Wiz Imp Jan 28 #143

Well I see you can't answer your own logic. Speaking of strawman argument, Emile Jan 28 #147

OK. If you say so. Wiz Imp Jan 28 #151

I do say so and you are still not answering your own logic. Emile Jan 28 #152

Exactly SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #119

and how is voting for them effective and actually makes a difference? Emile Jan 28 #141

A handful voted SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #146

Your words, not mine. You said Emile Jan 28 #149

So democrats criticizing SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #162

You are still not answering your own logic. Emile Jan 28 #173

I'm not understanding your question SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #174

Do I have to copy and paste what you said in every reply? Emile Jan 28 #176

It would help SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #177

LOL 🤣 Emile Jan 28 #178

Im not an expert angrychair Jan 28 #161

I think it depends on context SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #167

They should be out everyday Marigold Jan 28 #81

Who is 'they' exactly? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #94

"They" is the Democrats Marigold Jan 28 #107

Who are 'the democrats'? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #108

Nevermind. Pointless discussion. Marigold Jan 28 #112

Have a nice day SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #114

What do you mean by "the?" And when you say, "be," in what sense are you using that word? Scrivener7 Jan 28 #154

You can find definitions here SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #159

Yes, but I really don't have a sense of how you are using them. Scrivener7 Jan 28 #164

The definitions are SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #168

They could not vote for the fuckery? Bettie Jan 28 #87

Who is 'they'? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #95

What do you mean by "who?" Please be specific. And your use of the asterisk. Scrivener7 Jan 28 #155

Definitions are here SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #163

We fucking KNOW where the republicans are. As to who the ones are Autumn Jan 28 #49

Oh good grief... NewHendoLib Jan 28 #14

It's getting ridiculous on all fronts. Autumn Jan 28 #37

I have a feeling it can get worse still! NewHendoLib Jan 28 #44

Oh yeah it's gonna get a lot worse. Leadership needs to pay a lot more attention Autumn Jan 28 #72

Looks like we should have sent Dems in Congress a copy of On Tyranny. OneGrassRoot Jan 28 #93

How many of Trump's EO's are illegal? gab13by13 Jan 28 #16

Prey tell, how do you stop EOs, especially Dems who are not the party in control? brush Jan 28 #22

Democrats need to wave their magic wand SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #24

Exactly. I say let's see how far the mad man goes. brush Jan 28 #35

Yes I am puzzled dwayneb Jan 29 #241

That's the problem SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #243

So Democrats should look the other way gab13by13 Jan 28 #45

A powerful story, good on you, and people who joined in. electric_blue68 Jan 29 #205

These two Democratic Congresswomen have been attacked on Democratic Underground. C0RI0LANUS Jan 28 #19

Not okay SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #23

Those two women demonized leadership of their own party AkFemDem Jan 28 #31

So you're saying they got out of line? ForgoTheConsequence Jan 28 #90

Uhhhh....seems like you are trying to play that role! tritsofme Jan 28 #120

Biden failed the purity test, so they burned the entire party. That simple. AkFemDem Jan 28 #136

So has Nancy Pelosi. But that's not what either of this is about. This about people who are basically LeftInTX Jan 28 #36

We need to use the "Alert" button whenever we see a skeevy post on DU FakeNoose Jan 28 #55

They are being alerted on! Too many jury members must think "shitting on Democrats" is OK. LeftInTX Jan 28 #65

I guess DU is not a cult. Think. Again. Jan 29 #201

They're probably feeling optimistic what with all the Democrat-bashing, but they failed to take betsuni Jan 29 #204

Attacked or criticized? mcar Jan 28 #171

Ultimately Matters Such As This Will Be Decided By Moderators Applying Site Rules MayReasonRule Jan 28 #21

Post removed Post removed Jan 28 #25

Perhaps you were wrong about your alerts? Think. Again. Jan 28 #29

Thanks for trying. I think this points to how the juries are thinking, which is not good. LeftInTX Jan 28 #30

Well said SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #34

I know...It's not constructive. LeftInTX Jan 28 #39

I agree, this OP is definitely not constructive. Think. Again. Jan 28 #56

Happy Tuesday Y'all Perhaps Contact Administration Directly MayReasonRule Jan 28 #82

... demmiblue Jan 28 #28

I support democrats. Have my entire life. I support them in many ways. boston bean Jan 28 #38

Exactly what do you want them to do? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #47

Lead. Not silence and acquiescence. boston bean Jan 28 #70

And exactly how would that stop any EO? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #73

No one is stating they can stop it. But vocally and vociferously speak against it ok? boston bean Jan 28 #76

Where I live they are working hard to mitigate it. It's quiet and behind the scenes. (ICE raids etc) LeftInTX Jan 28 #84

I've heard several Dems denounce them SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #89

It seems to me kacekwl Jan 28 #105

That's an exaggeration SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #109

Great good go know. kacekwl Jan 28 #111

We are seeing our nation being dismantled. I'm not sure if you are arguing against Democratic lawmakers doing Doodley Jan 28 #179

Speaking out is great SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #180

So no voters need to be educated about what is going on? Nothing can be done? Unbelievable. Doodley Jan 28 #186

Never said that SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #187

I support Democrats. I don't support "Democrats" who attack Democrats or enable trumpism or the GOP in general. themaguffin Jan 28 #40

I have no problem with criticizing SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #50

All righty then Jilly_in_VA Jan 28 #144

Never thought making a statement SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #150

Whatever Truman said... mountain grammy Jan 28 #48

Well atreides1 Jan 28 #63

There is a big difference regarding "attacking Democrats." gab13by13 Jan 28 #53

Criticizing Fetterman or any other democrat SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #60

I get it that Trump is president and can issue EO's. gab13by13 Jan 28 #77

Then please tell us SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #97

Check it out mcar Jan 28 #172

Yeah, well, when you lose two of three elections to Donald Trump BeyondGeography Jan 28 #54

Not blindly. NT mahatmakanejeeves Jan 28 #58

I'm not accepting any appeasement. The issue is simple for me. You either honor your oath of office and defend Hotler Jan 28 #59

What appeasement are you referring to? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #61

IMO. They all failed for not even trying to declare the orange one a domestic enemy. Hotler Jan 28 #131

All? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #135

Right. And these same people that are complaining because not all Democrats are voting against everything Wiz Imp Jan 28 #148

Voting for any of his cabinet appointments. Voltaire2 Jan 29 #217

And those who did deserve to be criticized SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #219

Rubio 99-0 Voltaire2 Jan 29 #220

So the actions of 47 people SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #221

Lol. Voltaire2 Jan 29 #222

And thats still on 47 people SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #223

Thank you for posting this LetMyPeopleVote Jan 28 #62

Trying to silence legitimate criticism doesn't support Democrats. Renew Deal Jan 28 #66

I'm all for specific criticism SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #71

Unfortunately, the issue isn't the will of Democrats kerouac2 Jan 28 #68

How about an example or two as to what exactly you are Bettie Jan 28 #79

You can just read this thread SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #106

The party seems to have fallen asleep and let a Republican majority get elected. Omnipresent Jan 28 #80

We can't speak out when we disagree with a Democrat. That sounds like the Republicans theatening doc03 Jan 28 #88

Correct. ForgoTheConsequence Jan 28 #91

I had lots of complaints I heard from the MAGAs viewpoint as to why Harris lost and Biden's doc03 Jan 28 #98

A democrat, yes SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #101

No, it's more like postponing D-Day until 1970 because "we don't want to be like the enemy". hadEnuf Jan 28 #104

How so? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #115

We have been keeping our powder dry and now we are flooded. We should have been hammering the GOP with everything we had hadEnuf Jan 28 #195

How have democrats been keeping their powder dry? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #196

This is kinda' off topic but I got sick... Septua Jan 28 #124

But your posts criticizing DU posters for daring to criticize niyad Jan 28 #127

I have no problem SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #133

Hmm, for some reason I keep thinking of Lady Violet. niyad Jan 28 #193

Lol SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #194

They hate a fictional Democratic Party, why all the dramatic emotions, conspiracy theories, passive-aggressive betsuni Jan 28 #128

Where are they? claudette Jan 28 #132

Give me a break. alarimer Jan 28 #145

This Oneironaut Jan 28 #160

Sure SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #170

all gone. stillcool Jan 28 #157

I found the attacks on Hakeem Jeffries mcar Jan 28 #166

Who are these du democrats you are accusing for not voting for Harris? Emile Jan 28 #175

The "uncommitted" who regularly trashed mcar Jan 28 #181

Well you must have an idea who they are. Emile Jan 28 #182

It'd be easy enough for you to Google mcar Jan 28 #183

So you won't answer. Emile Jan 28 #184

I've answered - and nice try mcar Jan 28 #188

No you didn't, not even a nice try. Emile Jan 28 #191

I will never understand disagreeing with elected leaders over things important to us is called bashing. LakeArenal Jan 28 #185

Calling out individual democrats SocialDemocrat61 Jan 28 #189

There are times when the Democratic Party is, and should be, seen as a whole.... Think. Again. Jan 29 #202

Demonizing a whole group of people SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #206

There's a big difference between "demonizing" and holding accountable. Think. Again. Jan 29 #212

Yes hold individuals accountable SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #213

You don't seem to understand that when a majority of any given group act... Think. Again. Jan 29 #214

You don't seem to understand SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #215

I beg to differ... Think. Again. Jan 29 #216

Don't kid yourself SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #218

If they were doing that already.... Think. Again. Jan 29 #224

They were doing that already SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #225

Oh, so they were doing it SECRETLY, like garland did his job... Think. Again. Jan 29 #226

No, publicly SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #227

Again, if they were being proactive publicly... Think. Again. Jan 29 #228

Again, for some it's never enough SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #229

Well, they're STARTING to speak out now... Think. Again. Jan 29 #230

No they were doing it already SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #231

Including the one when Biden was still President? Emile Jan 29 #232

So they were only allowed to speak out SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #233

LOL Emile Jan 29 #234

Have a great day SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #236

You made my day, thanks. Emile Jan 29 #238

You're very welcome SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #239

I don't sign or believe in Loyalty Oaths. I''d rather think for myself. Ping Tung Jan 29 #197

Who said anything about loyalty oaths SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #199

Loyalty oaths, cult, blind allegiance, bow down, worship, toe the line, hive mind, betsuni Jan 29 #208

Too many just want SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #210

Ironic that they're the "Democrats can be too big of a tent" "there's no standard" people -- purity tests and betsuni Jan 29 #245

LOL Skittles Jan 29 #198

And they will continue to win SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #200

we support them Skittles Jan 29 #203

Never said anything about goose stepping SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #209

Just get it over with and say you want total obedience Renew Deal Jan 29 #240

Never said I want total obedience SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #242

that hardly describes the situation Skittles Jan 29 #269

True SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #270

How do you define "attacking"? Elessar Zappa Jan 29 #207

Post that SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #211

Some deserve it nt doc03 Jan 29 #237

Some do SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #247

I think there's some latitude in the rules depending on if we're in an election season or not CrispyQ Jan 29 #254

I have no issue with SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #255

I guess I'm one you'd take issue with then cuz I agree, as a party, as a unified voice, they aren't doing enough. -nt CrispyQ Jan 29 #258

What should they be doing? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #259

A unified no vote for all of his nominees would be a good start. CrispyQ Jan 29 #260

Are they all unqualified? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #261

I'm not a political strategist so maybe they should hire a few. Also, you're exhausting. Bye. -nt CrispyQ Jan 29 #264

Why? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #265

I thought claudette Jan 29 #256

Are you saying they don't? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #257

No claudette Jan 29 #262

How are they silent? SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #263

Guess I mean claudette Jan 29 #266

All democrats don't get the media attention SocialDemocrat61 Jan 29 #267

Ok claudette Jan 29 #268