Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Qutzupalotl

(15,146 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:20 AM 17 hrs ago

Adam Kinzinger: I served with Tulsi Gabbard and Yikes [View all]

DURING MY TIME IN CONGRESS, I had the privilege of working with all kinds of people from all over the country with different experiences, backgrounds, priorities, ideologies, approaches, strengths, and weaknesses. One of the people I overlapped with was Tulsi Gabbard, whom Donald Trump has announced he intended to nominate to become director of national intelligence (DNI). This role, the top job in America’s huge, powerful, world-beating intelligence-gathering and analysis enterprise, requires someone with steadfast integrity, sound judgment, and an unwavering commitment to the security of the United States.

Gabbard lacks all three qualities.
….

What concerns me most, however, is the amorality apparent in her decision-making. A DNI must be resolute in defending the Constitution, impartial in assessing threats, and unwavering in his or her commitment to American values. Gabbard’s track record suggests she prioritizes personal advancement and political expediency over these critical responsibilities. Her ability to shift loyalties and principles to suit her ambitions is not a trait we need in a position that demands impartiality and integrity.

Trump’s choice of Gabbard for this role is as perplexing as it is dangerous. By selecting someone with no significant intelligence experience and a history of erratic behavior, he is undermining the credibility of one of the most important positions in our national security apparatus—one whose ability not only to uncover and protect secrets but to tell hard truths to people in power is a key asymmetric advantage the United States enjoys over its adversaries. Worse still, Gabbard’s history of promoting authoritarian narratives raises legitimate concerns about her ability to prioritize America’s interests over those of foreign adversaries.


more: https://www.thebulwark.com/p/i-served-with-tulsi-gabbard-and-yikes
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's out of my hands JustAnotherGen 17 hrs ago #1
That's it right there. This was in the hands of voters in 7 states and not one Maru Kitteh 17 hrs ago #6
Because in all likelyhood more than one if not all of the 7 swing states had stolen elections. I live in Wisconsin..... usaf-vet 15 hrs ago #19
The reason they are all close is because some very smart PROGRAMMER wrote the software to do just that...... usaf-vet 15 hrs ago #24
Surprised there's no parachute to slow down the rocket, save fuel. BadgerKid 13 hrs ago #36
Just saving the booster is a big mission savings. usaf-vet 12 hrs ago #44
They weren't close iemanja 4 hrs ago #57
A big part of that manipulation was a right-wing "think" tank, the Bradley Foundation... keep_left 15 hrs ago #26
You are right the Wisconsin based Bradley Foundation is part of this remake of Wisconsin and now onto the USA. usaf-vet 15 hrs ago #29
Citizens United LiberalFighter 10 hrs ago #48
Legally manipulated is not the same thing as stolen. Maru Kitteh 14 hrs ago #31
I agree. Unless shown otherwise. Callie1979 13 hrs ago #37
so are there studies out NJCher 6 hrs ago #52
Dems are no slackers when it comes to gerrymandering NJCher 6 hrs ago #54
You think that's bad- look at Florida. We have a dictator as a Governor. kerry-is-my-prez 13 hrs ago #40
My consolation will be DENVERPOPS 15 hrs ago #25
Lower 99.9% Bettie 13 hrs ago #41
Agreed, DENVERPOPS 13 hrs ago #43
I heard one of these confused people say "I'll be rich someday and I won't want to pay all these taxes." CTyankee 12 hrs ago #45
And they don't get it Bettie 10 hrs ago #49
Your senators get a vote. Qutzupalotl 17 hrs ago #8
Mine don't need to be called...mercifully I have two liberal Dem Senators! CTyankee 16 hrs ago #10
Rubio and Scott will be glad to hear my concerns. rubbersole 16 hrs ago #12
My Senator is Tom Cotton calguy 15 hrs ago #17
Call anyway. Qutzupalotl 14 hrs ago #34
YES YES YES YES YES !!!!! Call ANYWAY !!!!! calimary 7 hrs ago #51
My ONLY contact with my Senator is when they ask for money. usaf-vet 14 hrs ago #30
That is unfortunate. murielm99 14 hrs ago #35
My senators don't care Bettie 13 hrs ago #42
Asset of a Foreign Adversary Renaissance Man 17 hrs ago #2
Trump's choice is not perplexing in the least. Irish_Dem 17 hrs ago #3
Prsident elect Trash didn't pick this cabinet, putinshit did. arthritisR_US 3 hrs ago #58
So I guess Michael Flynn wasn't a big enough traitor Walleye 17 hrs ago #4
+1 dalton99a 17 hrs ago #5
You do wonder what he's saving Flynn for. I'm sure we will see him. Maru Kitteh 16 hrs ago #15
Something that involves the military, no doubt. nt allegorical oracle 15 hrs ago #16
flynn commands the christian militias - proud boys and such rampartd 14 hrs ago #32
The Cult wanted him for SecDef! Callie1979 13 hrs ago #38
He will be waiting in the wings to take over once she fails (and she will) Nictuku 15 hrs ago #27
That's the point. Aaeia 17 hrs ago #7
It's almost like nobody realizes ScratchCat 17 hrs ago #9
Trump's pick is not at all surprising. Trust_Reality 16 hrs ago #11
Of course there are... rubbersole 16 hrs ago #13
It's not perplexing. Stop trying to be politically correct. progressoid 16 hrs ago #14
Yeah, my first introduction to HER was in 2015 LisaM 15 hrs ago #18
gabbard was raised as a "hare krishna." rampartd 14 hrs ago #33
I was hoping for some anecdotal muckraking, but this stuff could, and should, be cut and pasted for all Trumps nominees. jaxexpat 15 hrs ago #20
O M G!!!! elleng 15 hrs ago #21
Is it possible that Russian Intelligence asked for her to have that position? patphil 15 hrs ago #22
Or Pooty himself asked. moondust 15 hrs ago #23
Post removed Post removed 15 hrs ago #28
From the OP Title, I thought AZ was recalling serving in the military with her... Montauk6 13 hrs ago #39
It's not a perplexing choice. Dementold is choosing hyper-loyal people he knows that he's real comfy with Bernardo de La Paz 11 hrs ago #46
As Hilary said about her, Gabbard is a Putinista Hassler 11 hrs ago #47
"Yikes" is right, and perhaps under-stated.. Evolve Dammit 9 hrs ago #50
Pendejo45 doesn't want to RUN the government, he wants to RUIN the government. ... aggiesal 6 hrs ago #53
this seems barbtries 5 hrs ago #55
So Scary... Gabbard is one of Putin's Cha 5 hrs ago #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Kinzinger: I served ...