General Discussion

Scrivener7

(52,729 posts)

64. You were wrong.

Reply to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #62)

Tue Nov 19, 2024, 03:55 PM

Tuesday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Any Garland Defenders Watching Rachel [View all] gab13by13 Monday OP

No qazplm135 Monday #1

IMO he's a republican mole, Joe Biden's worst pick. The reason why trump was never... brush Monday #29

His NYS case H2O Man Tuesday #38

True, but for some reason the judge keeps postponing the sentencing. brush Tuesday #42

Definitely. H2O Man Tuesday #43

At this point, even if the judge gives Trump jail time (which is doubtful), the Supreme Court... LudwigPastorius Tuesday #44

brush, I agree with you, but I want to play devil's advocate here UniqueUserName Tuesday #51

Very few still believe the "conservative and tentative" Garland excuse any more. Irish_Dem Tuesday #52

Horrible choice in any time period. paleotn Tuesday #67

Is it a rerun? milestogo Monday #2

Yes, IOKIYAR rerun gab13by13 Monday #3

This message was self-deleted by its author radical noodle Monday #4

Agree Gab13by13. MG is complicit. Clouds Passing Monday #5

Justice delayed. See how that works? dchill Monday #6

Garland Failed Baron2024 Monday #7

He can be non-partisan when Trump prosecutes him and throws him in jail. hadEnuf Monday #10

Most of those BigMin28 Monday #12

I don't have any inside info but I have to say that dsc Monday #8

Better to try BigMin28 Monday #13

Under age is under age. Bluethroughu Monday #22

Felony sex with a minor is not a federal case. speak easy Monday #25

Even if it's with a US Congressman? Bluethroughu Monday #28

Then apparently CREW made a mistake when it sued DOJ gab13by13 Monday #30

Sex trafficking of a minor IS a [Federal] felony case. speak easy Monday #35

Okay atreides1 Tuesday #53

+1, any other person the DOJ would've thrown the library at them uponit7771 Tuesday #63

So? It's still a felony and a crime. brush Monday #31

It is if she crossed state lines to do it. Mr.Bill Tuesday #58

It is a Federal Felony offense if [a minor] is trafficked. speak easy Tuesday #68

no, but I believe transporting across state lines for sexual purposes is. JMCKUSICK Tuesday #66

"where the person is under 18 or where force, fraud or coercion exists" speak easy Tuesday #69

Criminals are surrounded by other criminals. Witnesses are usually criminals themselves. Irish_Dem Tuesday #54

If I live long enoughI would expect to see Garland blamed for the coming disaster gordianot Monday #9

Exactly my thoughts Dave says Monday #16

Exactly my thoughts too gab13by13 Monday #32

Saving this thread before it's deleted. Sigh usonian Monday #11

How in heaven's name is that thread similar to mine? gab13by13 Monday #34

Apologies if I goofed. usonian Tuesday #41

i might be misrembering... Takket Monday #14

He went to prison for sex trafficking among other things, Bluethroughu Monday #23

I thought Garland was spineless now I think he's complicit Tribetime Monday #15

Think he was in his underwear like Alan Dershowitz claimed? Evolve Dammit Tuesday #60

Garland was compromised the day he bent the knee. Weasel wart. NotHardly Monday #17

Not "had sex with", RAPED 0rganism Monday #18

Yep. A minor cannot consent to sex either. It is statutory rape even if she agrees that it was ok. kerry-is-my-prez Monday #33

Lather, rinse, repeat... Fiendish Thingy Monday #19

There is no defense for Merrick Garland not prosecuting gab13by13 Monday #36

Yes. Perform a blatant crime in full view of the entire country. Watch Garland's DOJ sit on its Scrivener7 Tuesday #45

Except Garland, Smith and DOJ did DO SOMETHING Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #47

Shaking my damn head. Scrivener7 Tuesday #49

Read this, and let me know what you think: Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #50

You have been wrong all this time. That's the verifiable reality. Scrivener7 Tuesday #61

Myths vs. Reality: Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #62

You were wrong. Scrivener7 Tuesday #64

Well, I guess that settles it then. Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #65

I say in my calm voice. .... Why would ANYONE defend Garland ??? So depressed. Trueblue1968 Monday #20

But, but Orrin Hatch gave him two thumbs up...🫱🫲 rubbersole Monday #24

Joe has Garland's back Kaleva Tuesday #39

Happy now that they stole that SCOTUS seat from Obama. Otherwise, Garland would be with us forever! Jit423 Tuesday #57

Some people transfer their loyalty to Obama and Biden TheKentuckian Monday #21

Post removed Post removed Monday #26

Me too. gab13by13 Tuesday #37

Normalize calling Gaetz a RAPIST for sexually AllyCat Monday #27

We don't know if Biden is watching Rachel Kaleva Tuesday #40

I am amazed Garland has not done anything visibly kansasobama Tuesday #46

The SCOTUS ruling against Colorado... returnee Tuesday #48

SCOTUS is doing their very best to protect SCROTUM (oops, I meant Orange Julius). Evolve Dammit Tuesday #56

When it comes to these fuckers orangecrush Tuesday #55

45 months and counting republianmushroom Tuesday #59

The through-thread is Federalist Society membership. Snarkoleptic Tuesday #70

W has already broke that mold. czarjak Tuesday #71