Garland lovers are still defending him.

[Intractable]

50. "Bring some facts to the discussion, "

Your huge posts with so many facts completely lose the forest in the trees every time.

The facts you like to cite are minutiae. They read like the phone book. Everything so ordered. The numbers may be correct, but the math doesn't produce the intended results, does it?

There's a huge meta-difference between facts and truth.

The Truth is our system of justice failed us, and Garland was the leader of that system.

>> No discussion of Trump judges or obstruction by the perps.

That's part of the failed system, isn't it?

I stand by my assertion that you are psychologically obsessed with Garland's personal reputation, as evidenced by your many knee-jerk reactions and the way you just repeat yourself.

I would advise you to stop taking the name of Garland so personally. At no point in any of my posts did I bash Garland, yes? YES!!!

You are easily triggered by the mere mention of his name, and this completely obscures anything useful in what you might say.

You say I'm obsessed. That's real silly. My concern is to win the next elections and then build a better system. Garland will obviously not have any part in that.