Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
No qazplm135 Monday #1
IMO he's a republican mole, Joe Biden's worst pick. The reason why trump was never... brush Monday #29
His NYS case H2O Man Tuesday #38
True, but for some reason the judge keeps postponing the sentencing. brush Tuesday #42
Definitely. H2O Man Tuesday #43
At this point, even if the judge gives Trump jail time (which is doubtful), the Supreme Court... LudwigPastorius Tuesday #44
brush, I agree with you, but I want to play devil's advocate here UniqueUserName Tuesday #51
Very few still believe the "conservative and tentative" Garland excuse any more. Irish_Dem Tuesday #52
Horrible choice in any time period. paleotn Tuesday #67
Is it a rerun? milestogo Monday #2
Yes, IOKIYAR rerun gab13by13 Monday #3
This message was self-deleted by its author radical noodle Monday #4
Agree Gab13by13. MG is complicit. Clouds Passing Monday #5
Justice delayed. See how that works? dchill Monday #6
Garland Failed Baron2024 Monday #7
He can be non-partisan when Trump prosecutes him and throws him in jail. hadEnuf Monday #10
Most of those BigMin28 Monday #12
I don't have any inside info but I have to say that dsc Monday #8
Better to try BigMin28 Monday #13
Under age is under age. Bluethroughu Monday #22
Felony sex with a minor is not a federal case. speak easy Monday #25
Even if it's with a US Congressman? Bluethroughu Monday #28
Then apparently CREW made a mistake when it sued DOJ gab13by13 Monday #30
Sex trafficking of a minor IS a [Federal] felony case. speak easy Monday #35
Okay atreides1 Tuesday #53
+1, any other person the DOJ would've thrown the library at them uponit7771 Tuesday #63
So? It's still a felony and a crime. brush Monday #31
It is if she crossed state lines to do it. Mr.Bill Tuesday #58
It is a Federal Felony offense if [a minor] is trafficked. speak easy Tuesday #68
no, but I believe transporting across state lines for sexual purposes is. JMCKUSICK Tuesday #66
"where the person is under 18 or where force, fraud or coercion exists" speak easy Tuesday #69
Criminals are surrounded by other criminals. Witnesses are usually criminals themselves. Irish_Dem Tuesday #54
If I live long enoughI would expect to see Garland blamed for the coming disaster gordianot Monday #9
Exactly my thoughts Dave says Monday #16
Exactly my thoughts too gab13by13 Monday #32
Saving this thread before it's deleted. Sigh usonian Monday #11
How in heaven's name is that thread similar to mine? gab13by13 Monday #34
Apologies if I goofed. usonian Tuesday #41
i might be misrembering... Takket Monday #14
He went to prison for sex trafficking among other things, Bluethroughu Monday #23
I thought Garland was spineless now I think he's complicit Tribetime Monday #15
Think he was in his underwear like Alan Dershowitz claimed? Evolve Dammit Tuesday #60
Garland was compromised the day he bent the knee. Weasel wart. NotHardly Monday #17
Not "had sex with", RAPED 0rganism Monday #18
Yep. A minor cannot consent to sex either. It is statutory rape even if she agrees that it was ok. kerry-is-my-prez Monday #33
Lather, rinse, repeat... Fiendish Thingy Monday #19
There is no defense for Merrick Garland not prosecuting gab13by13 Monday #36
Yes. Perform a blatant crime in full view of the entire country. Watch Garland's DOJ sit on its Scrivener7 Tuesday #45
Except Garland, Smith and DOJ did DO SOMETHING Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #47
Shaking my damn head. Scrivener7 Tuesday #49
Read this, and let me know what you think: Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #50
You have been wrong all this time. That's the verifiable reality. Scrivener7 Tuesday #61
Myths vs. Reality: Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #62
You were wrong. Scrivener7 Tuesday #64
Well, I guess that settles it then. Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #65
I say in my calm voice. .... Why would ANYONE defend Garland ??? So depressed. Trueblue1968 Monday #20
But, but Orrin Hatch gave him two thumbs up...🫱🫲 rubbersole Monday #24
Joe has Garland's back Kaleva Tuesday #39
Happy now that they stole that SCOTUS seat from Obama. Otherwise, Garland would be with us forever! Jit423 Tuesday #57
Some people transfer their loyalty to Obama and Biden TheKentuckian Monday #21
Post removed Post removed Monday #26
Me too. gab13by13 Tuesday #37
Normalize calling Gaetz a RAPIST for sexually AllyCat Monday #27
We don't know if Biden is watching Rachel Kaleva Tuesday #40
I am amazed Garland has not done anything visibly kansasobama Tuesday #46
The SCOTUS ruling against Colorado... returnee Tuesday #48
SCOTUS is doing their very best to protect SCROTUM (oops, I meant Orange Julius). Evolve Dammit Tuesday #56
When it comes to these fuckers orangecrush Tuesday #55
45 months and counting republianmushroom Tuesday #59
The through-thread is Federalist Society membership. Snarkoleptic Tuesday #70
W has already broke that mold. czarjak Tuesday #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any Garland Defenders Wat...»Reply #38