General Discussion

gab13by13

(25,325 posts)

34. How in heaven's name is that thread similar to mine?

Mon Nov 18, 2024, 11:52 PM

Nov 18

You certainly did deride my thread so now I ask you politely to tell me what I posted that is not factual?

The ball is in your court, explain to me why my thread should be deleted?

Garland allowed Hunter Biden to be investigated on a bogus Russian hoax perpetrated by Rudy Giuliani. Hunter Biden was prosecuted under Barr and garland for 5 years but druggie, sex trafficker Matt Gaetz was more believable than numerous witnesses, including the victim.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hoodoo 90-percent DLevine BeerBarrelPolka kacekwl Xavier Breath Kali999 tonekat republianmushroom

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Any Garland Defenders Watching Rachel [View all] gab13by13 Nov 18 OP

No qazplm135 Nov 18 #1

IMO he's a republican mole, Joe Biden's worst pick. The reason why trump was never... brush Nov 18 #29

His NYS case H2O Man Nov 19 #38

True, but for some reason the judge keeps postponing the sentencing. brush Nov 19 #42

Definitely. H2O Man Nov 19 #43

At this point, even if the judge gives Trump jail time (which is doubtful), the Supreme Court... LudwigPastorius Nov 19 #44

brush, I agree with you, but I want to play devil's advocate here UniqueUserName Nov 19 #51

Very few still believe the "conservative and tentative" Garland excuse any more. Irish_Dem Nov 19 #52

Horrible choice in any time period. paleotn Nov 19 #67

Is it a rerun? milestogo Nov 18 #2

Yes, IOKIYAR rerun gab13by13 Nov 18 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author radical noodle Nov 18 #4

Agree Gab13by13. MG is complicit. Clouds Passing Nov 18 #5

Justice delayed. See how that works? dchill Nov 18 #6

Garland Failed Baron2024 Nov 18 #7

He can be non-partisan when Trump prosecutes him and throws him in jail. hadEnuf Nov 18 #10

Most of those BigMin28 Nov 18 #12

I don't have any inside info but I have to say that dsc Nov 18 #8

Better to try BigMin28 Nov 18 #13

Under age is under age. Bluethroughu Nov 18 #22

Felony sex with a minor is not a federal case. speak easy Nov 18 #25

Even if it's with a US Congressman? Bluethroughu Nov 18 #28

Then apparently CREW made a mistake when it sued DOJ gab13by13 Nov 18 #30

Sex trafficking of a minor IS a [Federal] felony case. speak easy Nov 18 #35

Okay atreides1 Nov 19 #53

+1, any other person the DOJ would've thrown the library at them uponit7771 Nov 19 #63

So? It's still a felony and a crime. brush Nov 18 #31

It is if she crossed state lines to do it. Mr.Bill Nov 19 #58

It is a Federal Felony offense if [a minor] is trafficked. speak easy Nov 19 #68

no, but I believe transporting across state lines for sexual purposes is. JMCKUSICK Nov 19 #66

"where the person is under 18 or where force, fraud or coercion exists" speak easy Nov 19 #69

Criminals are surrounded by other criminals. Witnesses are usually criminals themselves. Irish_Dem Nov 19 #54

If I live long enoughI would expect to see Garland blamed for the coming disaster gordianot Nov 18 #9

Exactly my thoughts Dave says Nov 18 #16

Exactly my thoughts too gab13by13 Nov 18 #32

Saving this thread before it's deleted. Sigh usonian Nov 18 #11

How in heaven's name is that thread similar to mine? gab13by13 Nov 18 #34

Apologies if I goofed. usonian Nov 19 #41

i might be misrembering... Takket Nov 18 #14

He went to prison for sex trafficking among other things, Bluethroughu Nov 18 #23

I thought Garland was spineless now I think he's complicit Tribetime Nov 18 #15

Think he was in his underwear like Alan Dershowitz claimed? Evolve Dammit Nov 19 #60

Garland was compromised the day he bent the knee. Weasel wart. NotHardly Nov 18 #17

Not "had sex with", RAPED 0rganism Nov 18 #18

Yep. A minor cannot consent to sex either. It is statutory rape even if she agrees that it was ok. kerry-is-my-prez Nov 18 #33

Lather, rinse, repeat... Fiendish Thingy Nov 18 #19

There is no defense for Merrick Garland not prosecuting gab13by13 Nov 18 #36

Yes. Perform a blatant crime in full view of the entire country. Watch Garland's DOJ sit on its Scrivener7 Nov 19 #45

Except Garland, Smith and DOJ did DO SOMETHING Fiendish Thingy Nov 19 #47

Shaking my damn head. Scrivener7 Nov 19 #49

Read this, and let me know what you think: Fiendish Thingy Nov 19 #50

You have been wrong all this time. That's the verifiable reality. Scrivener7 Nov 19 #61

Myths vs. Reality: Fiendish Thingy Nov 19 #62

You were wrong. Scrivener7 Nov 19 #64

Well, I guess that settles it then. Fiendish Thingy Nov 19 #65

I say in my calm voice. .... Why would ANYONE defend Garland ??? So depressed. Trueblue1968 Nov 18 #20

But, but Orrin Hatch gave him two thumbs up...🫱🫲 rubbersole Nov 18 #24

Joe has Garland's back Kaleva Nov 19 #39

Happy now that they stole that SCOTUS seat from Obama. Otherwise, Garland would be with us forever! Jit423 Nov 19 #57

Some people transfer their loyalty to Obama and Biden TheKentuckian Nov 18 #21

Post removed Post removed Nov 18 #26

Me too. gab13by13 Nov 19 #37

Normalize calling Gaetz a RAPIST for sexually AllyCat Nov 18 #27

We don't know if Biden is watching Rachel Kaleva Nov 19 #40

I am amazed Garland has not done anything visibly kansasobama Nov 19 #46

The SCOTUS ruling against Colorado... returnee Nov 19 #48

SCOTUS is doing their very best to protect SCROTUM (oops, I meant Orange Julius). Evolve Dammit Nov 19 #56

When it comes to these fuckers orangecrush Nov 19 #55

45 months and counting republianmushroom Nov 19 #59

The through-thread is Federalist Society membership. Snarkoleptic Nov 19 #70

W has already broke that mold. czarjak Nov 19 #71