Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
By 2026 Congress will be toothless gab13by13 Saturday #1
They'll set it up so the cuts aren't effective for at least 4 years. unblock Saturday #2
How? He has no legal or Constitutional authority to make cuts. He can suggest cuts but that is a long way Jit423 Saturday #3
I don't think you understand how dictatorships work. Irish_Dem Saturday #7
I thought the 75% was about cutting Fed employees underpants Saturday #4
Musk and Ramaswamy expect to get money out of this and add to their fortunes. That's it. Walleye Saturday #5
By making the claim that illegal immigrants are getting SS and Medicare and it was the doc03 Saturday #6
He was talking about reducing the number of federal employees, not people on Social Security WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #8
Ramaswamy: "If your Social Security number (SSN) ends with an odd (number), you're out. That's 50% cut right there. red dog 1 Sunday #14
I thought that was referring to cut in emolyees JI7 Saturday #9
He was. And it was only a "thought experiment" at that. WillowTree Sunday #18
It will be set up so that it is phased in.. EarthFirst Saturday #10
Not sure that's true...according to Vivek Ramaswamy "If your SSN ends in an odd, you're out" red dog 1 Sunday #15
I'm certain this Ontheboundry Saturday #11
So you're saying he's not talking about SS recipients but federal employees whose SSN starts with an even number? red dog 1 Sunday #16
It was a 75% reduction in federal employees Ritabert Saturday #12
OK, point taken. no_hypocrisy Saturday #13
Ok then if I'm excluded then I want all of the SS tax I paid in back. roamer65 Sunday #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's say Vivek isn't bei...»Reply #5