Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Letter from cybersecurity experts about hand counting and 2024 election anomalies [View all]soandso
(1,617 posts)266. Okay, then my bad
I perceived you as coming across as though people weren't taking these issues seriously.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
286 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Letter from cybersecurity experts about hand counting and 2024 election anomalies [View all]
Loupe Garoue
Nov 14
OP
"We have no evidence that the outcomes of the elections in those states were actually compromised"
speak easy
Nov 14
#5
But you said you answered all my questions, where are the audit and recount results...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#55
I have been painstakingly clear that I am only calling for verification of the first-count results...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#67
A paper trail that you don't think any regular citizen should get to inspect
questionseverything
Nov 15
#251
No matter what you say, a thousand people could watch a machine spit out a results tape
questionseverything
Nov 15
#256
You don't acknowledge that the system is non transparent or that American citizens have a right to oversee the
questionseverything
Nov 16
#269
The difference being, we the American people have a right to oversee our elections
questionseverything
Nov 14
#32
They usually need some evidence that a crime was in fact committed before investigating
Kaleva
Nov 15
#177
Well, when you investigate concerns THAT''S when you usually uncover whatever evidence there is!!
ElementaryPenguin
Nov 14
#92
If American citizens are not allowed to see the actual counting of votes,
questionseverything
Nov 15
#246
To my way of thinking, AFTER witnessing what TFG WILL DO in our countrys future
bluestarone
Nov 14
#14
Kamala lost the election fair & square. Just as Trump did in 2020. Enough said. n/t
Jacson6
Nov 14
#18
In response to your "wild speculation" claim, I guess it's okay to just post this again...
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#66
Elias didn't seem to think bomb scares all over Democratic strongholds were a huge problem
questionseverything
Nov 15
#255
(psssttt... some of the first-counts aren't even done yet and audits also take a little time)
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#48
I agree, let's go straight to recounts and get whatever proof there may be.
Think. Again.
Nov 14
#72
I don't see why I appear "desperate" to you when all I'm doing is replying to other posters.
Think. Again.
Nov 15
#265
That should be standard practice with anything as important as public office elections...
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#279
Ye, that evidence is "discovered" through investigations, like the recounts that are being called for.
Think. Again.
Nov 16
#285
It is ABSOLUTELY essential that the Harris/Walz campaign audit votes, but the software needs to be forensically
BComplex
Nov 15
#150
How do we know that the Harris campaign hasn't picked up things with their own data?
Jarqui
Nov 15
#222
Greg Palast thinks that provisional ballots were the key, with over 2 million tossed.
TheRickles
Nov 15
#204