Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Probably not stress-eating as much TlalocW Mar 2023 #1
You beat me to it. emulatorloo Mar 2023 #11
Maybe, but he is much more active with two rambunctious Corgis, including a puppy. hlthe2b Mar 2023 #17
wow... he sure did. BlueWaveNeverEnd Mar 2023 #2
Thanks for the pic.. Cha Mar 2023 #5
And he cut that mullet. His hair was looking crazy for a bit Bristlecone Mar 2023 #9
He appears to be a nice guy. I wonder what took him so long? KA was reprehensible. CTyankee Mar 2023 #3
Sometimes it takes a while. LiberalFighter Mar 2023 #13
Probably his kids - 4 kids 17 and younger womanofthehills Mar 2023 #19
what a tragedy for her! I think you must be right. CTyankee Mar 2023 #23
He probably got one of those gastric bypass ops. Like Al Roker. beaglelover Mar 2023 #4
I'd say he lost a chunk...like maybe 115 to 125 lbs? Not sure how much the ex weighs......anyone KewlKat Mar 2023 #6
True, true! nt LAS14 Mar 2023 #7
Divorce is hell hookaleft Mar 2023 #8
3rd one is pretty easy... ret5hd Mar 2023 #10
It sure does! blueinredohio Mar 2023 #15
I think Rebl2 Mar 2023 #12
I wonder how much Kellyanne weighs. He's at least rid of that. Crunchy Frog Mar 2023 #14
He lost at least TlalocW Mar 2023 #16
He's gotten rid of about 105 pounds choie Mar 2023 #18
A divorce aand Ozempic will do that. tinrobot Mar 2023 #20
I don't think certain things are shallow, perhaps he was on a diet Polybius Mar 2023 #21
Well, he did shed the lizard-lady......... lastlib Mar 2023 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not to be shallow, but Ge...»Reply #20