Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dpibel

(3,974 posts)
38. Sources, y'know
Sun Feb 26, 2023, 04:55 PM
Feb 2023

When I do a search on Peter Daszak, the accusatory items I find seem to come from NY Post, National Review, Daily Caller, The Intercept.

You know. Solid liberal sources.

So there's that.

And I have to believe, based on what you're saying here, that you believe the Arizona snipe hunt into election misconduct was absolutely justified.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

At one time the US had 44 CDC workers in China, some in Wuhan. TFG reduced that to 0 in 2119. panader0 Feb 2023 #1
Energy Dept. LOL! Has the Coast Guard weighed in yet? Blues Heron Feb 2023 #2
Yeah! Why would the Dept of Energy investigate the origin of a medical outbreak? Generic Brad Feb 2023 #5
This was my question... Bettie Feb 2023 #6
They were warned in 2017 by US Diplomatics womanofthehills Feb 2023 #14
OK, thanks for the answer Bettie Feb 2023 #22
Because it has an office that is part of the United States Intelligence Community. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2023 #7
DoE has some heavy-duty intelligence responsibilities Ocelot II Feb 2023 #9
Came here to say that. DoE has the mythical "above top secret" clearances. sir pball Feb 2023 #57
Maybe because their researcher's tackle the world's toughest problems womanofthehills Feb 2023 #20
DOE's responsibilities include national security. Hortensis Feb 2023 #33
The DoE oversees our national laboratories Sympthsical Feb 2023 #12
The Energy Department, which oversees many U.S. laboratories, gldstwmn Feb 2023 #34
We should deplatform the DoE and the FBI for spreading misinformation Sympthsical Feb 2023 #3
Boy, I'll be reading this in the right-wing rag in my city soon. dem4decades Feb 2023 #4
This is some misplaced prioritization Sympthsical Feb 2023 #8
Another problem was the US funding Eco Health Alliance womanofthehills Feb 2023 #17
That also got censored to hell and back Sympthsical Feb 2023 #18
For a person who has no idea dpibel Feb 2023 #23
Science is weird like that Sympthsical Feb 2023 #25
"Just asking questions!" dpibel Feb 2023 #27
The onus is on you is to prove the sin Sympthsical Feb 2023 #32
Sources, y'know dpibel Feb 2023 #38
Jeffrey Sacks was commissioned by the Lancet to look into the origins of the virus womanofthehills Feb 2023 #44
Another link from Wall Street Journal womanofthehills Feb 2023 #45
You're proving my point Sympthsical Feb 2023 #53
In point of fact, you're the one who made it tribal dpibel Feb 2023 #54
Very well said. Should be a no-brainer, but y'know Covid. nt Brenda Feb 2023 #58
Just out of curiosity dpibel Feb 2023 #39
Thank you Zeitghost Feb 2023 #26
You are making light of a really serious world problem womanofthehills Feb 2023 #16
"The Energy Department made its judgment with "low confidence," according to people who have read hlthe2b Feb 2023 #10
What people? Sometimes we have to close our own bio labs for violations womanofthehills Feb 2023 #21
This finding is being incorrectly reported. The headlines don't match the facts. Nevilledog Feb 2023 #41
Exactly and frankly their "evidence" is NOT biological. Low evidence is not at all worthy of the hlthe2b Feb 2023 #43
They have never found a connection to any animal at the market womanofthehills Feb 2023 #48
And they've never found that any lab had possessed a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2. Nevilledog Feb 2023 #52
Just saw this too Nevilledog Feb 2023 #42
I agree with Hotez... hlthe2b Feb 2023 #46
Hortez told us the vaccines could end the pandemic womanofthehills Feb 2023 #49
It wouldn't surprise me. Hear me out ecstatic Feb 2023 #11
I think you might be misunderstanding the report. yardwork Feb 2023 #28
What keeps being glossed over in this debate Tom Rinaldo Feb 2023 #13
Yes, exactly. Ocelot II Feb 2023 #15
Smallpox lab accident womanofthehills Feb 2023 #55
List of laboratory biosecurity incidents - Wiki womanofthehills Feb 2023 #19
Who leaked this classified report? Buckeyeblue Feb 2023 #24
The Energy Department's new conclusions are found in an updated gldstwmn Feb 2023 #36
Where is the evidence it was a lab leak... Meowmee Feb 2023 #29
I thought this was all settled...? spanone Feb 2023 #30
A lot of it was settled. GoCubsGo Feb 2023 #35
What does the CDC say? And what is the Dept of Energy's expertise on this matter? n/t pnwmom Feb 2023 #31
great - i can hear it now Fullduplexxx Feb 2023 #37
Wonder how many people were banned from social media... WarGamer Feb 2023 #40
A whole hell of a lot. Brenda Feb 2023 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author dpibel Feb 2023 #50
from 19 months ago: Senior Biden officials finding that Covid lab leak theory as credible as natural Celerity Feb 2023 #59
I've always thought it was a lab leak. I've read a lot of books and literature about viruses prior liberal_mama Feb 2023 #51
Agree - look at this info about our own lab in Fort Detrich womanofthehills Feb 2023 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Agency Says Lab Leak Most...»Reply #38