General Discussion

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)

6. Completely disagree

Fri Apr 8, 2022, 08:44 AM

Apr 2022

If you paid me to convince my wife to vote for someone I DIDN'T support (simply for the money) you'd have an argument. If I support a candidate but I don't have the income freedom to spend my time convincing friends and family to vote for the candidate, paying for my time is perfectly appropriate.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'If we do this right...': The new Dem organizing strategy catching fire ahead of the midterms [View all] brooklynite Apr 2022 OP

"Paying people to talk about voting" strikes me as disturbingly close to buying votes. Hellbound Hellhound Apr 2022 #1

But if you pay people to create an ad to convince people to vote? brooklynite Apr 2022 #2

An ad is different than paying an individual directly to convince their families to vote. Hellbound Hellhound Apr 2022 #3

Completely disagree brooklynite Apr 2022 #6

And what if you don't support the candidate? Hellbound Hellhound Apr 2022 #8

What are you afraid of? That it might lead to success for Democrats? bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #10

Not "Afraid" of anything other than regressing into an unconstitutional quagmire. Hellbound Hellhound Apr 2022 #13

There is no Constitutional quagmire here. There are no bribes there. bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #14

Party people ...campaign workers are already paid to talk to voters...nothing wrong with it. Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #21

You only talk to a list of Democrats or Democratic friendly voters...I assume you would support Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #22

I completely agree. Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #23

In the light of boundless corruption from R's lambchopp59 Apr 2022 #30

OK. Then share your alternative idea. I'm willing to hear it. littlemissmartypants Apr 2022 #32

Campaigns pay people to do all kinds of GOTV related activities mcar Apr 2022 #4

A political party is paying individual citizens, not professionals in their organization, for votes. Hellbound Hellhound Apr 2022 #7

No...one could say I work for the campaign...but not the paid part. Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #19

I think it is fine. People who work on well funded campaigns are already paid. I don't have any Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #20

Party employees and volunteers regularly talk to voters mcar Apr 2022 #25

+1 This bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #11

I'm with you there. LuvLoogie Apr 2022 #5

Ads don't work...how many of us even have cable TV anymore? I would make sure that we hire some Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #17

They will say what they say no matter what we do...so a big who cares. We can't let them dictate to Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #18

I take you have never worked the GOTV...the lists are of Democratic voters...some who voted in the Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #24

Outreach marketing. Perfectly legal, and quite an innovation to tap into people inactive politically bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #9

And it will be used in Fetterman's campaign to help get out the vote now doubt in the General... Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #16

Better use of money than expensive TV ads ibegurpard Apr 2022 #12

Why not? Everything that works is OK by me. We need to win more elections...the sooner the better. Demsrule86 Apr 2022 #15

GQP will either copy or denigrate. Fingers crossed 🤞 live love laugh Apr 2022 #26

Actually I think the GOP is already there bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #28

Makes more sense than going up to a magat's door. Interesting though, targeting the GoodRaisin Apr 2022 #27

Go for it! Martin68 Apr 2022 #29

As long as we win nt XanaDUer2 Apr 2022 #31