Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheRealNorth

(9,647 posts)
15. The vaccine could probably still be given "off label"
Fri Sep 17, 2021, 03:01 PM
Sep 2021

But in those cases, insurance would probably not pay for it.

Also, I suspect boosters will eventually happen. The issue was the data on waning immunity presented by Pfizer was not independently reviewed by experts.

There were other questions about what Pfizer was measuring (they measured only antibodies), while they failed to look at other parts of the immune system. The point is that as you get farther and farther away from the exposure to an antigen (the virus or the vaccine), most of your antibodies (IgG antibodies) against Covid will go away. However, the immune system maintains other types of antibodies at low levels that will help ramp up production of IgG if an infection is encountered again.

Now there may be questions about whether you are more likely to be an asymptomatic carrier, or experience mild symptoms, if the amount of IgG gets too low (as it takes the body time to make more). This is why boosters are more important for immune-compromised individuals, who may have a tougher time making more antibodies quickly.

There is also the potential issue of new strains of Covid with resistance to the current vaccine, but that would probably mean we would need new versions of the vaccine, kind of like the new versions we need for the flu vaccine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yikes. So we should just watch our immunity slowly wane away? lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #1
I just edited the OP. This was for the broad use of boosters. Now they are consider a limited JohnSJ Sep 2021 #6
My husband, a 71 year old heath care worker, may need to quit his job. In_The_Wind Sep 2021 #2
Recommended for him, yay. wryter2000 Sep 2021 #23
Shit wryter2000 Sep 2021 #3
okay then I'll get a Moderna booster. Cobalt Violet Sep 2021 #4
They weren't even trying to approve Moderna booster. LisaL Sep 2021 #8
Right now the boosters are just what you got before. BannonsLiver Sep 2021 #17
More details here: Ocelot II Sep 2021 #5
Thanks, I also edited the OP to reflect that. It is an advisory committee that could also be JohnSJ Sep 2021 #7
Who are these people? LisaL Sep 2021 #9
An advisory committee to the FDA. They haven't ruled on boosters just for an older population JohnSJ Sep 2021 #10
Lost Trust DET Sep 2021 #11
I think the science shots boosters aren't wifdely needed SoonerPride Sep 2021 #12
I'll be getting one soon anyway. BannonsLiver Sep 2021 #13
But that was before today LeftInTX Sep 2021 #18
I'll follow the science. Treefrog Sep 2021 #14
I'm glad I did. Crunchy Frog Sep 2021 #24
Good! Treefrog Sep 2021 #25
The vaccine could probably still be given "off label" TheRealNorth Sep 2021 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2021 #16
I understand the angst TheRealNorth Sep 2021 #19
Immune-compromised are already eligible for boosters. LisaL Sep 2021 #20
I'm 61 and have diabetes meow2u3 Sep 2021 #21
Boosters are allowed for immuno compromised. LisaL Sep 2021 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FDA advisory committee vo...»Reply #15