Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

standingtall

(3,144 posts)

8. There can be no balance without expanding the court

Reply to Under The Radar (Original post)

Mon Oct 12, 2020, 12:17 PM

Oct 2020

there only one legal remedy for an out of control Supreme Court and that's adding seats to it. We seriously need to get past this mindset that the makeup of the Supreme Court is rail we shouldn't touch.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Biden should answer the court packing question.. [View all] Under The Radar Oct 2020 OP

Good answer. This question would never have come up if they had played fair Walleye Oct 2020 #1

Biden is doing pretty well on his own wryter2000 Oct 2020 #2

That is nearly what it has become ever since the VP debate Under The Radar Oct 2020 #4

Imagine if he said wryter2000 Oct 2020 #5

And by not answering it at all... Under The Radar Oct 2020 #6

My Own Inclination, Sir, Is This The Magistrate Oct 2020 #3

Not answering the question hasn't hurt him, so he should continue to ignore it. Nt Fiendish Thingy Oct 2020 #7

There can be no balance without expanding the court standingtall Oct 2020 #8

That is the obvious answer but not the proper way of answering Under The Radar Oct 2020 #9