Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,532 posts)

3. Yeh, that sounds like an argument they would make. Just like, "I can't be guilty of obstruction

Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:44 PM

Apr 2019

because my orders were never carried out, so justice wasn't obstructed."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A question for the legal beagles here. I watched Rachel tonight and in discussing [View all] alwaysinasnit Apr 2019 OP

We could avoid the legal issue-- dawg day Apr 2019 #1

an argument could certainly be made. not clear if it would prevail. unblock Apr 2019 #2

I don't think so. TomSlick Apr 2019 #4

It Brings Up An Interesting Legal Question ChoppinBroccoli Apr 2019 #8

Thanks for the insights. alwaysinasnit Apr 2019 #9