Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My Deplorable in-laws this morning: not the reaction I expected! [View all]Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)89. The repub congress just did this
https://www.wired.com/story/fisa-section-702-renewal-congress/
They re-upped for six years and made it more onerous
If they still know how to read, show this to your in-laws
They re-upped for six years and made it more onerous
If they still know how to read, show this to your in-laws
In 2013, EDWARD Snowden revealed that the National Security Agency was legally collecting millions of Americans phone calls and electronic communicationsincluding emails, Facebook messages, and browsing historieswithout a warrant. Congress has now decided not only to reauthorize these programs, but also to expand some of their most invasive techniques.
The spying initiatives Snowden brought to light are authorized under Section 702 of the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, which was set to expire later this month. On Thursday, Congress voted down an effort to reform Section 702, and instead passed a bill that expanded warrantless surveillance of US citizens and foreigners. The newly passed bill reauthorizes Section 702 for six years, long after President Trumps first term in office will have expired.
The amendment that the House of Representatives shot down would have added significant privacy safeguards to the law, including the requirement that intelligence agents get a warrant in many cases before searching through emails and other digital communications belonging to US citizens. The bill Congress did pass, meanwhile, codifies some of the most troubling aspects of Section 702, according to privacy advocates. The legislation still needs to pass in the Senate, where fewer representatives are interested in significantly reforming the law.
The spying initiatives Snowden brought to light are authorized under Section 702 of the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, which was set to expire later this month. On Thursday, Congress voted down an effort to reform Section 702, and instead passed a bill that expanded warrantless surveillance of US citizens and foreigners. The newly passed bill reauthorizes Section 702 for six years, long after President Trumps first term in office will have expired.
The amendment that the House of Representatives shot down would have added significant privacy safeguards to the law, including the requirement that intelligence agents get a warrant in many cases before searching through emails and other digital communications belonging to US citizens. The bill Congress did pass, meanwhile, codifies some of the most troubling aspects of Section 702, according to privacy advocates. The legislation still needs to pass in the Senate, where fewer representatives are interested in significantly reforming the law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My Deplorable in-laws this morning: not the reaction I expected! [View all]
Still In Wisconsin
Feb 2018
OP
+1 "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter" MLK Jr...In the end,
lunasun
Feb 2018
#64
Been there, done that... recently, with an aunt and uncle. No longer welcome in my home!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2018
#12
"red-faced and yelling" means scared, regardless of the words that followed.
lindysalsagal
Feb 2018
#4
I bet a lot of them will be having mental breakdowns from his supporters when it all comes out nt
maryellen99
Feb 2018
#52
Well that sucks... so sorry to hear. I'll reserve my true thoughts, since they are your inlaws.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2018
#10
Wow - your post makes me happy most of my relatives are dead. Good for your wife.
Vinca
Feb 2018
#19
Thats too far.. its hard but i think you have to keep politics way out of the way when family
lancelyons
Feb 2018
#21
What do you mean "that's too far"? So they should've gone along with the insane ranting & raving
catbyte
Feb 2018
#63
Surprised. My family deplorables flipped the other way. No one ever mentions who they voted ....
marble falls
Feb 2018
#28
We're still praying for her parents, her dad is a deplorable but at least he doesn't discuss it ....
marble falls
Feb 2018
#34
I really don't know because the media markets in so many regions are dominated
deurbano
Feb 2018
#62
Maybe he was listening to a Rush L while working on the roof . Got too upset by one of
lunasun
Feb 2018
#68
This is when living in a red area has prepared me for this. It's the one I expect.
kydo
Feb 2018
#44
We'll done to your wife, but I really don't know how all this is going to end.
OnDoutside
Feb 2018
#53
The 30% are the most dangerous internal threat the country has faced since the 1860's
StuckInTexas
Feb 2018
#69
Same ancestry here. Holes in it too. Many DU folk could see the similarities back in Ws time. ☹️
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2018
#72
Invite them back, and agree not to talk politics. Don't allow Trump to break up your family.
parkerMcDavis
Feb 2018
#79