Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(219,049 posts)
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 01:30 AM Sunday

Trump Makes BIG ADMISSION in Court Filing by ACCIDENT - Meidas Touch



Donald Trump's lawyers screwed him big time after they make a STUNNING ACCIDENTAL ADMISSION in a recent court filing with Judge Tanya Chutkan. Florida State Prosecutor Dave Aronberg reacts. - 10/13/2024.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Makes BIG ADMISSION in Court Filing by ACCIDENT - Meidas Touch (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Sunday OP
Next time a Trump case gets before the USSC they will declare that "official presidency" is a 48 mo. 24/7 status. jaxexpat Sunday #1
Knr duncang Sunday #2
This is what happens when you hire lawyers you never intend to pay. KS Toronado Sunday #3
Excellent point!!! Rhiannon12866 Sunday #5
Yet another all-caps MTN claim that turns out to be much ado about nothing FBaggins Sunday #4

jaxexpat

(7,563 posts)
1. Next time a Trump case gets before the USSC they will declare that "official presidency" is a 48 mo. 24/7 status.
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 02:00 AM
Sunday

The Nazi justices will smile superciliously as they chop the legs of Smith's case from under him with a free-for-all nonsense and contradiction interpretation of their own previous unwarranted judgement.

Rhiannon12866

(219,049 posts)
5. Excellent point!!!
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 05:53 AM
Sunday

Not to mention, how many of his previous lawyers have been disgraced, faced charges or disbarred??

FBaggins

(27,409 posts)
4. Yet another all-caps MTN claim that turns out to be much ado about nothing
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 02:59 AM
Sunday

First - you can't say that something is an admission because the opposing party's legal theory says that it is. For it to be an admission, it would have to conflict with either the petitioner's own reasoning or that of the court's ruling.

More importantly - this argument already failed. The very filing that Aronberg is talking about - was a claim that seeking 1A protections means that you're admitting a private capacity for that act. Neither the SCOTUS majority nor the dissent adopted that theory. So there isn't much that Chutkan can do with it.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Trump Makes BIG ADMISSION...